EPTHaunted Mansion Mini Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
ANickelDrink
140 Posts
It's like ragnarok online but better. Nostalgia as fuck | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 25 2015 11:30 GlowingBear wrote: Cool, some weak early reads: Koshi looks townie for his tone. Especially when he makes the post of the town pyramid and the following one. Chrom looks townie for thinking critically about the game. SL looks scummy for this hard push on FF on a matter that isn't really alignment indicative. Tictock looks scummy for commenting that SL may have a point but concluding that FF's thing isn't alignment indicative. If SL does have a point then it is alignment indicative. If it isn't alignment indicative, SL doesn't have a point. Therefore you just look you're posting to look contributive while actually being fluffy and pushing the matter nowhere koshi just being koshi but good on you for tone read stuff sounds really generous towards chrom but i thought we were still fucking around mb you are right agree on sl only negative vibe i have about ticktock so far is the helpful townie post "i'm here to help" or whatever it was, your point by itself isn't necessarily hard evidence given how little has gone down so far | ||
|
ANickelDrink
140 Posts
On November 25 2015 11:55 GlowingBear wrote: Enough dicking around. What do you guys think of what I've brought on Tictock? this post right? On November 25 2015 11:30 GlowingBear wrote: Cool, some weak early reads: Koshi looks townie for his tone. Especially when he makes the post of the town pyramid and the following one. Chrom looks townie for thinking critically about the game. SL looks scummy for this hard push on FF on a matter that isn't really alignment indicative. Tictock looks scummy for commenting that SL may have a point but concluding that FF's thing isn't alignment indicative. If SL does have a point then it is alignment indicative. If it isn't alignment indicative, SL doesn't have a point. Therefore you just look you're posting to look contributive while actually being fluffy and pushing the matter nowhere That's honestly not a bad call... Isn't that just arguing that his choice of words was wrong though? | ||
|
ANickelDrink
140 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:15 GlowingBear wrote: Ok can we now talk about the game? Just comment on my reads post Yes sir, sorry sir. No I haven't had anything to drink tonight officer. Am I free to go? I do not consent to any searches. | ||
|
ANickelDrink
140 Posts
If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote: Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On November 25 2015 11:30 GlowingBear wrote: Cool, some weak early reads: Koshi looks townie for his tone. Especially when he makes the post of the town pyramid and the following one. Chrom looks townie for thinking critically about the game. SL looks scummy for this hard push on FF on a matter that isn't really alignment indicative. Tictock looks scummy for commenting that SL may have a point but concluding that FF's thing isn't alignment indicative. If SL does have a point then it is alignment indicative. If it isn't alignment indicative, SL doesn't have a point. Therefore you just look you're posting to look contributive while actually being fluffy and pushing the matter nowhere sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure. Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out. Koshi I don't have a read on. Let me expand on what I mean about OO: On November 25 2015 08:07 ObviousOne wrote: how can you be rolehunting when the op says everyone is vanilla? On November 25 2015 08:10 ObviousOne wrote: tbh it looks to me like you either a) lied about rolehunting when you meant smurfhunting and then stuck to your lie for whatever reason or b) didn't read the setup or c) you're mafia and just hinted at the hidden mechanic sicklucker posts his stuff about FF's claim being weird and also makes a comment about rolehunting. OO jumps on the "rolehunting" part of it, which is the part that looks weird and is easy to jump on as mafia (I was interested in his read on FF from it). The third post is the one I particularly didn't like. The whole post says nothing at all (no conclusion or any point for the post), it seems like it's just a poor attempt to explain why he jumped on the rolehunting comment when it clearly didn't mean much. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote: sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure. Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out. Koshi I don't have a read on. Let me expand on what I mean about OO: sicklucker posts his stuff about FF's claim being weird and also makes a comment about rolehunting. OO jumps on the "rolehunting" part of it, which is the part that looks weird and is easy to jump on as mafia (I was interested in his read on FF from it). The third post is the one I particularly didn't like. The whole post says nothing at all (no conclusion or any point for the post), it seems like it's just a poor attempt to explain why he jumped on the rolehunting comment when it clearly didn't mean much. he admitted to ignoring the setup completely mystery solved m80 | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote: like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:25 ANickelDrink wrote: Yes sir, sorry sir. No I haven't had anything to drink tonight officer. Am I free to go? I do not consent to any searches. You can't go. How could you not have any drinks tonight? This is insane! Anyway, I'm going to re read tictock's post to check what you're saying | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:41 ObviousOne wrote: he admitted to ignoring the setup completely mystery solved m80 Wouldn't he do that no matter his alignment? I don't see how that's relevant to what I'm saying. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:44 Chromatically wrote: Wouldn't he do that no matter his alignment? I don't see how that's relevant to what I'm saying. tbh i don't see how because it was easy that i shouldnt have commented on it, it was literally the first event in the game worth talking about and i wanted to see if he was slipping up as mafia or something. ignorance was the simplest explanation and also his claimed excuse. the reason that it didnt have a conclusion was pretty obviously stating my thoughts in the thread, i thought people might like to see that. i'll try to do less thinking since it offends you so. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote: Hmm? You might have a point here, especially revealing so early before he could even see the affects of smurfing. FF tends to play fairly lazily the first few days and picks it up later. Maybe he rolled mafia and was worried people would push him early on? Course all of this is assuming it's actually FF and not someone trying to mind game us early... that's pretty tinfoily though and would be a pretty silly play. Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. Nah, FF. He clearly agrees with SL. It's not a "I understand you, but..." Let me expand my suspicions on this post. If I see somethig that is NAI, whenever someone says it is suspicious, I will tell them that it's NAI. Whenever I see something that I find suspicious and someone say its suspicious, I will simply agree with it. I don't understand how can someone agree on a suspicion but reach the conclusion that that is NAI. His thought process is disconnected with his conclusion. In other words, it just sounds that he tried to fake putting thoughts on it when he was really just... Posting. Also, if this is slightly suspicious, why classifying it as NAI now instead of pushing it further, especially on the early phase of the game when usually we have NOTHING to pursue? Do you understsnd what I'm trying to say? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote: sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure. Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out. Koshi I don't have a read on. Let me expand on what I mean about OO: sicklucker posts his stuff about FF's claim being weird and also makes a comment about rolehunting. OO jumps on the "rolehunting" part of it, which is the part that looks weird and is easy to jump on as mafia (I was interested in his read on FF from it). The third post is the one I particularly didn't like. The whole post says nothing at all (no conclusion or any point for the post), it seems like it's just a poor attempt to explain why he jumped on the rolehunting comment when it clearly didn't mean much. I agree with you + the part where he overreacts to your suspicions | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On November 25 2015 12:54 ObviousOne wrote: tbh i don't see how because it was easy that i shouldnt have commented on it, it was literally the first event in the game worth talking about and i wanted to see if he was slipping up as mafia or something. ignorance was the simplest explanation and also his claimed excuse. the reason that it didnt have a conclusion was pretty obviously stating my thoughts in the thread, i thought people might like to see that. i'll try to do less thinking since it offends you so. You just said that you think SL is mafia for his push on FF, so why jump on the rolehunting thing that doesn't matter when you clearly have an opinion on his read on FF? Like if ignorance is the simplest explanation then why would you pick that to comment on over something you supposedly think is actually mafia..? This reaction seems super overblown to me. | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On November 25 2015 08:10 ObviousOne wrote: tbh it looks to me like you either a) lied about rolehunting when you meant smurfhunting and then stuck to your lie for whatever reason or b) didn't read the setup or c) you're mafia and just hinted at the hidden mechanic And you "wanted to see if he slipped up as scum", but then you post all of the possible answers for him before he even answers. How does that ever show whether he's slipping? | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
##Vote: ObviousOne | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On November 25 2015 07:18 Sn0_Man wrote: lets lynch koshi ##Vote: Koshi | ||
| ||
