|
On October 02 2015 07:17 rsoultin wrote: ...
i just posted a reads post and he says i have no reads
meh your reads are not reads. and you call my evidence "completely subjective".
Like i can't even express what i would want to write here.
|
On October 02 2015 07:18 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:14 sicklucker wrote: like im pretty sure cooltl is always the best vote here. Theres scenarios where mafia did some sick plays to keep him alive (like we lynched a claim powerole it kind of takes mafia voting him to do that...
Oh that and hes the most obv scum.liar ever.
It could also clear rsoutlin who I cant read because she has no reads just many words Are you scum? It doesn't clear rsoultin in any way. Or why does it, in your opinion? lol cool spewed rsoul town so hard you not reading his posts? classic tmi no.
|
On October 02 2015 07:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:17 rsoultin wrote: ...
i just posted a reads post and he says i have no reads
meh your reads are not reads. and you call my evidence "completely subjective". Like i can't even express what i would want to write here. I have a townread on Damdred and marv. The rest of my "reads" i have to re-evaluate when i am gonna do my re-read." We sure do know what your re-evaluation looks like right? Like you can do a full 180 or even a 720 if you feel like it, for no fucking reason. So by default, you managed to produce TWO reads on 10 people.
And again, this is after having posted 25 pages of filter.
|
GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right?
|
On October 02 2015 04:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:no, not really. i don't waste my time on bullshit. maybe you should go back to playing sc2mafia where reading the game and understanding what people say consists of simple one-liner messages like "i claim this role" or "my check on X is Y", and not thought processes and several other things like thinking what another person thinks and if it is motivated from what faction. I literally have no interest in proving your completely lie statements lies, over and over again. Anyone who reads the thread knows they are just plain out lies. But let me give you an example, just because it doesn't take more than a minute of my time that i consider more valuably used on other things than talking with you: Show nested quote +i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. Here is a post where scott claimed: Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 05:39 scott31337 wrote: I can't break Rayn's tunnel - and I really was hoping to get some use out of this before day 2 - I had planned an end of the day list post - but with Strongman I'm pretty fucked anyway.
I'm a one shot Nikka Coffey Malt Whiskey. I'm hard claiming. Here is the votecount at that time: Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Day 1 Recall List rsoultin (2): Trfel, Rels, scott31337 GlowingBear (3): rsoultin, Damdred, coolTLname Trfel (2): GlowingBear, Rels, scott31337, LightningStrike, sicklucker coolTLname (3): Rels, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy raynpelikoneet (1): coolTLname, MoosyDoosy Rels (0): rsoultinmarvellosity (0): rsoultin, Damdred, MoosyDoosyMoosyDoosy (0): marvellosityscott31337 (3): marvellosity, raynpelikoneet, rsoultin, sickluckerNot listing (1): The Shining Now you can go back and look at your sentence again. Then you can go back and read what happened AFTER scott claimed. Votes piled up on you. You are literally just lying unless you think "last minute" means 1,5 hour before the deadline and unless you think 7 = 3. thank you for your time.
On October 02 2015 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am waiting for you to prove the statement 7 = 3 because otherwise you are a liar and as per your own definition should be lynched.
coolTLname i am waiting for your answer to this. Not because it would change anything, just because i think this is hilarious. Almost as hilarious as asking that one dude what his read on himself is.
|
On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right? Silly rayn ??
did he retract from his claim?
|
On October 02 2015 07:32 coolTLname wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 04:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:no, not really. i don't waste my time on bullshit. maybe you should go back to playing sc2mafia where reading the game and understanding what people say consists of simple one-liner messages like "i claim this role" or "my check on X is Y", and not thought processes and several other things like thinking what another person thinks and if it is motivated from what faction. I literally have no interest in proving your completely lie statements lies, over and over again. Anyone who reads the thread knows they are just plain out lies. But let me give you an example, just because it doesn't take more than a minute of my time that i consider more valuably used on other things than talking with you: i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. Here is a post where scott claimed: On October 01 2015 05:39 scott31337 wrote: I can't break Rayn's tunnel - and I really was hoping to get some use out of this before day 2 - I had planned an end of the day list post - but with Strongman I'm pretty fucked anyway.
I'm a one shot Nikka Coffey Malt Whiskey. I'm hard claiming. Here is the votecount at that time: On October 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Day 1 Recall List rsoultin (2): Trfel, Rels, scott31337 GlowingBear (3): rsoultin, Damdred, coolTLname Trfel (2): GlowingBear, Rels, scott31337, LightningStrike, sicklucker coolTLname (3): Rels, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy raynpelikoneet (1): coolTLname, MoosyDoosy Rels (0): rsoultinmarvellosity (0): rsoultin, Damdred, MoosyDoosyMoosyDoosy (0): marvellosityscott31337 (3): marvellosity, raynpelikoneet, rsoultin, sickluckerNot listing (1): The Shining Now you can go back and look at your sentence again. Then you can go back and read what happened AFTER scott claimed. Votes piled up on you. You are literally just lying unless you think "last minute" means 1,5 hour before the deadline and unless you think 7 = 3. thank you for your time. On October 02 2015 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am waiting for you to prove the statement 7 = 3 because otherwise you are a liar and as per your own definition should be lynched. coolTLname i am waiting for your answer to this.Not because it would change anything, just because i think this is hilarious. Almost as hilarious as asking that one dude what his read on himself is. and im still waiting on your answer to literally lying 7 times because u forgot *cough* didn't read the thread. Everyone can remember the 7 votes being on me until scott claimed tracker and then damdred counterclaiming so all you're doing is distracting from your own lies. scott claiming tracker had absolutely nothing to do with me being lynched, i don't even know why you're nit picking over timestamps? Whereas you just totally missed tons of information , like not knowing rsoultin was a lynch candidate when she was up for for hours, with Trfel. It looked like she would be lynched. answer why you claim there were 7 votes on you when there was in fact 3? I literally proved that. You have never proved me lying, that's why YOU are being voted for and not me. Basic logic that should be clear to like 12yr old.
Again, why were you lying?
|
On October 02 2015 07:33 coolTLname wrote: the timestamp isnt even the same, 5:11 the votes and 5:39 where scott claimed Then go to the voting thread and prove me otherwise. I actually did that, WHICH YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU READ MY NEXT POST AFTER THAT!!!!!
|
On October 02 2015 07:33 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right? Silly rayn ?? did he retract from his claim? Yes he said hours ago that he was just angry and wasn't town rb i had an impression he somehow used that as calling you mafia on N1 no?
|
On October 02 2015 04:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: In the above post i took HtS' vote count from :11 and matched the votes up until :39, when scott claimed. That's why there is for example Moosy in (two places). The fact however is that coolTLname was at that time at 3 votes.
|
On October 02 2015 07:36 coolTLname wrote: im gonna ignore rayn, i clearly had 7 votes and was going to be lynched day 1 until the scott/damdred claim / cc. straight out lie. please stop posting, you are mafia.
|
and rsoultin somehow cannot see this. This game is so hilarious.
|
On October 02 2015 07:41 rsoultin wrote: -sighs-
he did have 7 votes on him before damdred cc'd scott, rayn
between the time scott claim and damdred cc'd he had 7 votes on him. i remember because i wasn't sure enough would switch HAHAHAHAHAH! that's not what he is arguing though, he is arguing he had 7 voted before scott claimed.
|
On October 02 2015 07:41 GlowingBear wrote: Rayn, don't you wonder why Marv got killed instread of you? not really, no.
|
On October 02 2015 07:44 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:33 Damdred wrote:On October 02 2015 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right? Silly rayn ?? did he retract from his claim? Yes he said hours ago that he was just angry and wasn't town rb i had an impression he somehow used that as calling you mafia on N1 no? Probably is it or isn't it? i am gonna confirm that myself later on.
|
On October 02 2015 07:46 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:41 rsoultin wrote: -sighs-
he did have 7 votes on him before damdred cc'd scott, rayn
between the time scott claim and damdred cc'd he had 7 votes on him. i remember because i wasn't sure enough would switch HAHAHAHAHAH! that's not what he is arguing though, he is arguing he had 7 voted before scott claimed. ...that doesn't appear to be what he's arguing? he appears to be arguing that he was fine with being lynched over me when he originally got the 7 votes but was happy to vote for scott after damdred cc'd...what are you pushing him for exactly? read the thread.
|
LIKE HOW CAN YOU FUCKING CALL ME MAFIA WHEN YOU DONT EVEN READ THE THREAD?
|
On October 02 2015 03:56 coolTLname wrote: i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7.
This is what he originally said. I don't care what he says now. This is what i was arguing about,
HOW FUCKING BIG SHOULD I MAKE IT FOR YOU FOR IT TO BE OBVIOUS??!?!?!?!?
|
On October 02 2015 07:49 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 03:56 coolTLname wrote: i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7.
This is what he originally said. I don't care what he says now. This is what i was arguing about, HOW FUCKING BIG SHOULD I MAKE IT FOR YOU FOR IT TO BE OBVIOUS??!?!?!?!? i found the other time thank you rayn mmm now my question to you is, why do you miss this simple stuff all the time? somehow you cannot produce a read on that guy, in fact as i remember you called him town because "he is new" (which is btw not a reason to read anyone anything). You just conveniently miss too much stuff Tina.
|
...and then you come here telling ME that my case on you is bad, when at the same time you are proving my points.
|
|
|
|