|
On September 25 2015 07:41 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:37 Rels wrote: + we are super lucky the inquisitor died DAY FUCKING 1 If you read the scum QT, we had no idea until your claim and 90% of my posts are making plan about how make inquisitor claim p:
you got my role anyways from N2. I mean, we had no idea the inquisitor died p: the PM saying the targets of inqui and oracle was ambiguous so we thought oracle + inqui were alive until you claimed ehhh... what the fuck?
|
On September 25 2015 07:41 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:37 Rels wrote: + we are super lucky the inquisitor died DAY FUCKING 1 If you read the scum QT, we had no idea until your claim and 90% of my posts are making plan about how make inquisitor claim p:
you got my role anyways from N2. I mean, we had no idea the inquisitor died p: the PM saying the targets of inqui and oracle was ambiguous so we thought oracle + inqui were alive until you claimed like the correct format is:
"one of the cop/oracle visited: X the other one visited: Y"
or
"one of the cop/oracle visited: X the other one visited: noone"
or
"both of the cop/oracle visited: noone"
|
On September 25 2015 07:46 Rels wrote: N1 The following players were targeted by the Inquisitor and the Oracle: Damdred N2 The following players were targeted by the Inquisitor and the Oracle: Ticktock I guess if the cop was alive and let's say checked damdred on N1 it would be: N1 The following players were targeted by the Inquisitor and the Oracle: Damdred, Damdred
badly worded, it should be clear.
|
On September 25 2015 07:47 Rels wrote: And I spent 2 HOURS LOOKING FOR CLUES about HOW THE FUCK the inquisitor AND rayn managed to check TicTock, when it was decided to check fidei
AHAHAHAHAHHA ^^
|
|
On September 25 2015 07:49 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:47 LightningStrike wrote: BTW Geript please explain why you actually visited me instead of Rayn? We all curious. super curious about that too yeah me too rofl
|
On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup. c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs....
|
On September 25 2015 07:51 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup.
*Noticed Rels was thinking Crusader was still alive as D3 started in their QT yeah wouldn't have made the difference as we were targeted you last for that specific reason p: and when you make the soup kill you make it fucking sure you know what you are doing anyways so it would have been easy to figure out lol.
|
On September 25 2015 07:53 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup. c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs.... fidei actually asked palmar if we could know if the post was made at "normal" deadline (so dandel was crusader) or just before (so dandel was grandier) his answer: no we were disapointed i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear.
|
On September 25 2015 07:56 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:53 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup. c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs.... fidei actually asked palmar if we could know if the post was made at "normal" deadline (so dandel was crusader) or just before (so dandel was grandier) his answer: no we were disapointed i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear. man should have thought of that ha.. you were not 100% on the page :p
|
On September 25 2015 07:59 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 07:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:56 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:53 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup. c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs.... fidei actually asked palmar if we could know if the post was made at "normal" deadline (so dandel was crusader) or just before (so dandel was grandier) his answer: no we were disapointed i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear. man should have thought of that ha.. you were not 100% on the page :p yeah p: actually the reason I decided to soup instead of doing claims was that if TT was crusader we would lose p: if I was sure TT was grandier I would have directed the mass claim then claimed mafia and laughed =D you can't lose a massclaim as scum if you have 2 mafia alive. It's impossible.
Figure it out if you haven't already.
|
On September 25 2015 08:02 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 08:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:59 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:56 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:53 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:50 Tictock wrote: Oh also, Dam you rayn for pointing out that Dandel was Crusader not Grandeir!!!
Like that bit of WIFOM on the soup coulda been great for us. I was sorta planning to claim crusader and bait out a fail soup. c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs.... fidei actually asked palmar if we could know if the post was made at "normal" deadline (so dandel was crusader) or just before (so dandel was grandier) his answer: no we were disapointed i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear. man should have thought of that ha.. you were not 100% on the page :p yeah p: actually the reason I decided to soup instead of doing claims was that if TT was crusader we would lose p: if I was sure TT was grandier I would have directed the mass claim then claimed mafia and laughed =D you can't lose a massclaim as scum if you have 2 mafia alive. It's impossible. Figure it out if you haven't already. ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) yes we can p: crusader lynch crusader shoot mafia 1 exorcist shoot mafia 2 no, you just claim differently then and soup everyone..... who even cares if you lynch mafia when everyone has claimed when you have night actions?
|
On September 25 2015 08:05 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 08:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 08:02 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 08:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:59 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:56 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:53 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: [quote] c'mon do you think Rels does not read the roles? ffs.... fidei actually asked palmar if we could know if the post was made at "normal" deadline (so dandel was crusader) or just before (so dandel was grandier) his answer: no we were disapointed i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear. man should have thought of that ha.. you were not 100% on the page :p yeah p: actually the reason I decided to soup instead of doing claims was that if TT was crusader we would lose p: if I was sure TT was grandier I would have directed the mass claim then claimed mafia and laughed =D you can't lose a massclaim as scum if you have 2 mafia alive. It's impossible. Figure it out if you haven't already. ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) yes we can p: crusader lynch crusader shoot mafia 1 exorcist shoot mafia 2 no, you just claim differently then and soup everyone..... who even cares if you lynch mafia when everyone has claimed when you have night actions? ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) yeah but taht's the point. I had no role to claim (crusader not possible; acolyte, not with what I said to BM; exorcist, I forgot him during an analysis). so whatever I claimed if anyone did a little detective work I would be dead and fidei would be lynched over anyone he counter claimed, but TT. But if TT is the crusader, he cannot counter claim him p: like if you were alive in this situation, even with 2 mafias, all claim meant loss If both of the crusader and exo are alive, both of the mafia claim Exo.
|
On September 25 2015 08:09 Rels wrote:I super proud of these posts Show nested quote + I think HTS is the exorcist for being OK with the plan of killing LS exo shoot someone especially for this: "if LS is actually town (and we'd know that if there's an exorcist shot the next day)"
I think FF is acolyte for townreading Shining all the way except his first post, and for not giving Damdred credit for a implicit green check and for this after the start of D2, when geript Shining and Dandel were dead: "So that was painful. 3 dead towns is pretty sad for day 2"
I think TT is grandier (or crusader) by POE p: TT is 100% not the exorcist
mmmm... good scum work.
|
people give their roles away too easily *sigh*
|
On September 25 2015 08:12 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 08:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 08:05 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 08:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 08:02 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 08:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:59 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 07:56 Rels wrote:On September 25 2015 07:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: [quote] i checked that too and the wording on the lynch (he was lynched) was very clear. man should have thought of that ha.. you were not 100% on the page :p yeah p: actually the reason I decided to soup instead of doing claims was that if TT was crusader we would lose p: if I was sure TT was grandier I would have directed the mass claim then claimed mafia and laughed =D you can't lose a massclaim as scum if you have 2 mafia alive. It's impossible. Figure it out if you haven't already. ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) yes we can p: crusader lynch crusader shoot mafia 1 exorcist shoot mafia 2 no, you just claim differently then and soup everyone..... who even cares if you lynch mafia when everyone has claimed when you have night actions? ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) yeah but taht's the point. I had no role to claim (crusader not possible; acolyte, not with what I said to BM; exorcist, I forgot him during an analysis). so whatever I claimed if anyone did a little detective work I would be dead and fidei would be lynched over anyone he counter claimed, but TT. But if TT is the crusader, he cannot counter claim him p: like if you were alive in this situation, even with 2 mafias, all claim meant loss If both of the crusader and exo are alive, both of the mafia claim Exo. Maybe in general. But in this game if we do that we lose. I am not believable since I forgot exorcist in an analysis. dude you are believed over anyone alive in this game.... 100%
|
On September 25 2015 08:13 Rels wrote: wait wait waiiiiiit rayn fidei guessed you were oracle D1 =D let me find it mmm i am pretty sure i know what he is talking about and i was like "fuck if this outs me while it's a honest mistake i didn't mean".
|
On September 25 2015 08:15 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +Actually, starting to think that this probably makes Rayn the oracle. He wants to know who the inquisitor is checking, but he doesn't make the point about the oracle, which is ducking dumb, unless he's the Mafia (which he isn't) or he's oracle. Or he's dumb.
Damdred could yolo swag soup Vivax Martyr and Rayn acolyte if he really wants out of this game. Swag! OK he exchanged "acolyte" for "oracle" in the last sentence. But it was So. Fucking. Good. oh rofl no no no.... hahahhah, it would have been funny if you guys did that though.
|
I never "wanted to know who the cop is checking". I wanted to "drive the cop & oracle to the same target".
|
On September 25 2015 08:16 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2015 08:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2015 08:15 Rels wrote:Actually, starting to think that this probably makes Rayn the oracle. He wants to know who the inquisitor is checking, but he doesn't make the point about the oracle, which is ducking dumb, unless he's the Mafia (which he isn't) or he's oracle. Or he's dumb.
Damdred could yolo swag soup Vivax Martyr and Rayn acolyte if he really wants out of this game. Swag! OK he exchanged "acolyte" for "oracle" in the last sentence. But it was So. Fucking. Good. oh rofl no no no.... hahahhah, it would have been funny if you guys did that though. was that what you were thinking ? i accidently called the oracle "rov" (which it is where i have played before). I have to fucking triple check the roles just to know into what roles the rolenames are attached to...
|
|
|
|