[M][N] Completely Normal Generic Mini Mafia

On September 15 2015 06:46 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
I really hope claiming vt is not a thing here because that would be unfortunate

On September 15 2015 07:08 geript wrote:

Since I'll be busy tomorrow and wednesday with an Interview I should get and ACLS, I might as well explain now. PalmAr becvause he feels all wrong; he's actually taking the game seriously which is a first in a million games (fyi those games he was town). Damdred because bad reads.

On September 15 2015 07:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well your read on Moosy is terrible.
I agree with other reads.

On September 15 2015 07:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well your read on Moosy is terrible.
I agree with other reads.

On September 15 2015 07:18 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Can I get a run down on players metas around here. Like who is active who is a lurker. Who is a good scum stuff like that.

On September 15 2015 07:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:

and why would that be?
do you thin k you should be read as town?

well i can tell you you should not.

On September 15 2015 07:20 MoosyDoosy wrote:

nope, i'm saying i shouldn't be read as town bb. <3

On September 15 2015 07:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
then i don't understand why you want to draw attention to that post so please elaborate?

On September 15 2015 07:20 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So I'm reading Crime & Punishment which is a really deep book.

On September 15 2015 07:24 Cephiro wrote:


I haven't followed the mafia of this forum in about two years or so, and I didn't particularly care about doing my research on "how does a normal TL mafia day 1 look like recently". I play like I want to play, if someone wants to peg me as mafia or town because of being serious or not, that's up to them.

I figure I'll be participating enough for people that bother to play the game properly to be able to correctly read me as town with my input, rather than wasting their time on guessing based on their own conclusions which are likely to be extremely off.

What I mean by this is that it's stupid to assume someone's emotional state (especially someone you have no idea of, or at least someone you haven't seen any play from in over 2 years) based on a few posts earlygame, and then make a read on that. You can get a feel for what you think of that persons alignment, sure. But anything concrete? Highly unlikely.

If I seem too serious by TL standard then so be it, you'll have to adapt your reads accordingly. But maybe you shouldn't compare someone who has no idea of what is "TL standard" at the moment, nor any interest in trying to fit the "TL standard", to the TL standard. I'm me, I play like I play. If you should compare my play to anything, it should be compared against the content I end up producing in this game. (I'm quite confident in saying if you try to read 2+ year old games to try and get a "meta" on me, you're just going to waste your time. Feel free to, if you think otherwise however.)

Short ver: I play like I want to play, I have no need to "fit a mold". If someone thinks I'm scummy because of that, that's their loss. If someone wants to paint me as scummy because of that, good luck pushing your bad agenda.

On September 15 2015 07:31 Cephiro wrote:
@Damdred: Is there a particular reason you want to push your reads out that much that early?

I don't mind you sharing your reads at all, that's rarely a bad thing. But we're in a point of the game where you hardly have any proper information to correctly peg someone with. And thus far you're just posting every few minutes saying who you're learning town/scum on, at a point where it's extremely unlikely you even have a proper opinion of stuff yourself.

As in, don't you think you could be contributing more by asking questions or creating content in other ways, rather than just constantly throwing out reads of "X seems town, Y might not be"?