EPT[M][N] Completely Normal Generic Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
(I wish the latter.) | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
Brilliant scumhunting Koshi, I'd applaud you for that one if my other hand wasn't occupied by being in my face right now. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
So far all you have is "Cephiro is mafia, thus it will be easy to convince everyone to vote for him." Convincing as fuck, would vote myself if it was allowed. Is there a reason you're avoiding answering my question, or are you too bad to make something up that quickly?  | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
So I just have to name a random person mafia with no reasoning, and everyone will happily sheep me without giving a fuck? I didn't sign up for that kind of shit  But I'm willing to give you the benefit of doubt that you're just messing around earlygame and being stupid. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
On September 15 2015 07:13 ritoky wrote: @cephiro, if you had to work in the military or the theater, which would you work at? @Military, because I'm a reserve officer. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
On September 15 2015 07:15 ritoky wrote: then why so melodramatic instead of proportional response? I haven't followed the mafia of this forum in about two years or so, and I didn't particularly care about doing my research on "how does a normal TL mafia day 1 look like recently". I play like I want to play, if someone wants to peg me as mafia or town because of being serious or not, that's up to them. I figure I'll be participating enough for people that bother to play the game properly to be able to correctly read me as town with my input, rather than wasting their time on guessing based on their own conclusions which are likely to be extremely off. What I mean by this is that it's stupid to assume someone's emotional state (especially someone you have no idea of, or at least someone you haven't seen any play from in over 2 years) based on a few posts earlygame, and then make a read on that. You can get a feel for what you think of that persons alignment, sure. But anything concrete? Highly unlikely. If I seem too serious by TL standard then so be it, you'll have to adapt your reads accordingly. But maybe you shouldn't compare someone who has no idea of what is "TL standard" at the moment, nor any interest in trying to fit the "TL standard", to the TL standard. I'm me, I play like I play. If you should compare my play to anything, it should be compared against the content I end up producing in this game. (I'm quite confident in saying if you try to read 2+ year old games to try and get a "meta" on me, you're just going to waste your time. Feel free to, if you think otherwise however.) Short ver: I play like I want to play, I have no need to "fit a mold". If someone thinks I'm scummy because of that, that's their loss. If someone wants to paint me as scummy because of that, good luck pushing your bad agenda. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
I don't mind you sharing your reads at all, that's rarely a bad thing. But we're in a point of the game where you hardly have any proper information to correctly peg someone with. And thus far you're just posting every few minutes saying who you're learning town/scum on, at a point where it's extremely unlikely you even have a proper opinion of stuff yourself. As in, don't you think you could be contributing more by asking questions or creating content in other ways, rather than just constantly throwing out reads of "X seems town, Y might not be"? | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
@ rayn, Moosy, jat: I guess you all have a point, but for now I'll stick to my own conclusions of different actions. I suppose the game has to be started somehow, you'll have to pardon me for not joining this "everyone gets a read" -start, as I'd prefer to be more confident in my reads before sharing any (unless others feel like my opinion is valuable enough / they need more contest to be able to read me from), in which case I'm willing to share my more unsure / leaning a bit towards something reads. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
On September 15 2015 07:45 Wile E. Coyote wrote: so no one answered my question. I didnt care that much but it was a free town read and kind of a test I won't mind answering your questions otherwise, but I think it would be stupid of me (as someone who hasn't been around for years), to claim that I have any idea about people and their meta. I'm just going to consider like I never knew anything about any player here and make my reads based on that, with a small exception for some experience being into account. (As in, I am well aware that some players in the game have an extensive history of playing mafia, which will more or less affect the way they approach the game.) | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
On September 15 2015 07:47 Damdred wrote: Actually I don't suggest playing this way at all it requires me to care and reevaluate to often and to much. But I generally do catch mafia when rayn and I don't tear the thread apart as we go after two different mafia lol. I have to admit this post sounds a bit off to me. If you're town, you wouldn't really care as much about consistency since whatever you say will be your true opinion on the persons you read. Of course you want to play properly so the town benefits more, but you sound a bit like "I need to pay extra attention to what I do so I won't get called out for inconsistencies." As far as I know, mafia are usually much more concerned about that kind of stuff than town. Of course no town wants to be misread as scum as it's not beneficial for them, but they don't have the "innate fear of being caught" for an inconsistency. Just saying what I think. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1919 Posts
On September 15 2015 07:56 Damdred wrote: I don't know how you got I worry about inconsistencies at all from my post when I just said its a lot of work constantly re evaluating early reads as the game progresses? Actually I don't suggest playing this way at all it requires me to care and reevaluate to often and to much. This is the sentence that I'm referring to. I could easily be misreading it by giving my conclusion too much power over the true meaning of it. (Something I even mentioned earlier shouldn't be done, talk about being a hypocrite.) It just seemed like it was more of a "This playstyle is a burden on me" (which, if you're town, should be no issue since you've decided to pursue that style yourself, thus calling it a burden seems a bit contradictory), rather than "I wouldn't suggest this playstyle for others". But I might be just reading too much into it. | ||
| ||
