EPTOn September 18 2015 23:34 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2015 23:29 justanothertownie wrote:
I did not argue being backgroundy for most of day1. I argued that it makes me mafia which it evidently doesn't. And the blatant lie was a blatant lie.
On September 18 2015 23:25 Palmar wrote:
The reason I say that is jat keeps painting a picture where something that is arguable/marginal is much more than it is. For example this stuff with damdred now. Also the stuff I posted during the night:
It's another example of sort of the same thing.
I cba going back to check now, but I posted about jat being background-y and he argued that one as well.
It's the whole "slight misinterpretation" -> "blatant lie". "waffly read" - > "hard scumread"
The reason I say that is jat keeps painting a picture where something that is arguable/marginal is much more than it is. For example this stuff with damdred now. Also the stuff I posted during the night:
On September 17 2015 23:10 Palmar wrote:
Because it is not a retarded argument. Yes, people had already discussed that, but that doesn't make the argument invalid.
The argument goes like this
wile is reading thread
wile reads something and goes "hey, fuck yeah I got this guy"
wile reads on realizes that "oh wait, people already talked about it and it's been explained why it's not relevant"
The idea is, wile is less likely to be mafia because he was
1) actually reading the thread
2) trying to find things that look off
3) excited when he thought he found something
It's not really a complicated concept. It doesn't mean he's guaranteed to be town, but it means he's more likely to be town.
Painting this as blatant lie is at best dumb and at worst scummy. He's not even stating a fact, he's stating an opinion. And I agree (although this post comes after you admittedly had started contributing more). I even said as much at least twice in the thread.
That was more about the humor value of the post.
On September 17 2015 22:22 justanothertownie wrote:
Why the fuck did people sheep this retarded argument? Wile/SL wasn't even the first one pointing it out. A big chunk of this game was about that shit.
On September 17 2015 05:26 Damdred wrote:
Yo add onto this there's this moment that just happened. He was obviously catching up in thread and he had this ah ha moment when he thought he caught moosey.
It just seemed so legitimate and honest and such a town reaction. Pretty sure rayns right on him.
But I think we lynch jat
On September 17 2015 05:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And Wile is never going to be mafia ffs.
And Wile is never going to be mafia ffs.
Yo add onto this there's this moment that just happened. He was obviously catching up in thread and he had this ah ha moment when he thought he caught moosey.
It just seemed so legitimate and honest and such a town reaction. Pretty sure rayns right on him.
But I think we lynch jat
Why the fuck did people sheep this retarded argument? Wile/SL wasn't even the first one pointing it out. A big chunk of this game was about that shit.
Because it is not a retarded argument. Yes, people had already discussed that, but that doesn't make the argument invalid.
The argument goes like this
wile is reading thread
wile reads something and goes "hey, fuck yeah I got this guy"
wile reads on realizes that "oh wait, people already talked about it and it's been explained why it's not relevant"
The idea is, wile is less likely to be mafia because he was
1) actually reading the thread
2) trying to find things that look off
3) excited when he thought he found something
It's not really a complicated concept. It doesn't mean he's guaranteed to be town, but it means he's more likely to be town.
On September 17 2015 22:22 justanothertownie wrote:
See point 3). Blatant lie.
On September 17 2015 06:02 Damdred wrote:
Jats the best lynch probably he doesn't care it seems pushed nothing all day.
Jats the best lynch probably he doesn't care it seems pushed nothing all day.
See point 3). Blatant lie.
Painting this as blatant lie is at best dumb and at worst scummy. He's not even stating a fact, he's stating an opinion. And I agree (although this post comes after you admittedly had started contributing more). I even said as much at least twice in the thread.
On September 15 2015 18:57 Palmar wrote:
I feel like JAT has basically been a non-entity this game. Maybe I should tunnel him to see what happens.
I feel like JAT has basically been a non-entity this game. Maybe I should tunnel him to see what happens.
On September 16 2015 19:40 Palmar wrote:
JAT could also be mafia. I am actually serious that he could be. There's a lot of argumentative loud people in this game and there is plenty to stuff I talk about. I just get this overall feeling that he's always sort of in the background. Maybe I'm just ignoring his posts but whenever people are talking in the thread (for example this morning) it feels like he is offering way less to the discussion than everyone else who is talking.
JAT could also be mafia. I am actually serious that he could be. There's a lot of argumentative loud people in this game and there is plenty to stuff I talk about. I just get this overall feeling that he's always sort of in the background. Maybe I'm just ignoring his posts but whenever people are talking in the thread (for example this morning) it feels like he is offering way less to the discussion than everyone else who is talking.
On September 17 2015 22:22 justanothertownie wrote:
What was good about that? He clearly missed the point of the post entirely.
On September 17 2015 06:26 Palmar wrote:
Also his "I'm not gonna tell you how to live your life" post was gold.
Also his "I'm not gonna tell you how to live your life" post was gold.
What was good about that? He clearly missed the point of the post entirely.
That was more about the humor value of the post.
It's another example of sort of the same thing.
I cba going back to check now, but I posted about jat being background-y and he argued that one as well.
It's the whole "slight misinterpretation" -> "blatant lie". "waffly read" - > "hard scumread"
I did not argue being backgroundy for most of day1. I argued that it makes me mafia which it evidently doesn't. And the blatant lie was a blatant lie.
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2015 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:
You can say I was in the background yesterday. But not today - that's just plain untrue. Not that it would make me mafia anyways.
On September 16 2015 19:40 Palmar wrote:
JAT could also be mafia. I am actually serious that he could be. There's a lot of argumentative loud people in this game and there is plenty to stuff I talk about. I just get this overall feeling that he's always sort of in the background. Maybe I'm just ignoring his posts but whenever people are talking in the thread (for example this morning) it feels like he is offering way less to the discussion than everyone else who is talking.
JAT could also be mafia. I am actually serious that he could be. There's a lot of argumentative loud people in this game and there is plenty to stuff I talk about. I just get this overall feeling that he's always sort of in the background. Maybe I'm just ignoring his posts but whenever people are talking in the thread (for example this morning) it feels like he is offering way less to the discussion than everyone else who is talking.
You can say I was in the background yesterday. But not today - that's just plain untrue. Not that it would make me mafia anyways.
There is 0 contradiction in those posts?????
