|
On August 27 2015 23:46 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc did too
Said bf was my preferred lurker lynch before. What's your question?
|
On August 27 2015 23:48 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:47 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 KelsierSC wrote:On August 27 2015 23:36 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:35 KelsierSC wrote:On August 27 2015 23:33 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:33 KelsierSC wrote:On August 27 2015 23:31 WaveofShadow wrote:
KSC also hinging on CCs nit-picking points as a reason to lynch me makes him look even worse imo.
He even voted me before CCs huge case iirc and now he uses that to justify
Rsoul I think it was with you we talked about ksc? And I think at the time I felt I was maybe being unreasonable and you convinced me. Still think the same about ksc? nope my case on you is seperate from what CC said . nice OMGUS though Thank you, I do quite like it. have you read what moosy wrote then? Of course.i don't think he's scum anymore for the post when I said so. On August 27 2015 12:46 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 11:12 MoosyDoosy wrote:On August 27 2015 11:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Decondou and boxer are more scummy than Hopeless, if you want to talk about people that have a few posts. The info about hopeless is literally all OGI and irrelevant to this game imo I town tone read deconduo and boxer has done nothing. I don't really care to lynch either of them. Also, I am not most likely town this game. I've been playing very sub-optimally and have been deviating very far from my D1 meta which was a mistake on my part. -shrugs- But I'll make do for now until N1. Damn. Scumread evaporated. this? hmm can you explain why he went to town when you were scumreading him for pocketing you and asking you disjointed questions?> Yarp. Because of all new players, moosy is the most likely one to act like a super new player and apologize for suboptimal play. Could be a ploy on his own meta but I super doubt it based on what I've seen of him before. so his bad play is just bad town and apologising for it makes him town then?
Sort of?
It's more the form in which he does so and the reference to the fact that he somehow purposefully was manipulating his D1 meta when I don't think anyone else mentioned his meta anywhere?
Like I could see me making a post like that in my first scum game but I've seen moosy play and this is very town of him.
|
On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol
It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it.
|
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
|
On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
Wut
Explain this plz
For.... future reference
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On August 27 2015 23:51 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it.
so who would you lynch?
|
On August 27 2015 23:51 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it.
Meh I think we're stuck on semantics I think lol
Truffles wafflies are town truffle though. He amuses me when he argues with himself in his own posts
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
what mean you?
|
On August 27 2015 23:53 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
Wut Explain this plz For.... future reference
Nope ^^ if i'm right i'll be able to read you and that's too valuable XP
|
On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol
I seem to recall Trfel being around at the time. I didn't check my fax before stating that, I could be misremembering, but if he was actually present during the posts in question - he didn't have to "filterdive" me because he was THERE when it HAPPENED. You were there too Tina and you KNOW he was there, which means that the "filterdive" only exists as a means to push his agenda, which at last count is "shade VE, lynch inactive"....when he was townreading me before based on THE SAME POSTS HE IS CURRENTLY SCUMREADING ME FOR!
Like I get it, you don't want to be wrong. No one does. But you MIGHT be wrong, and in this case PROBABLY ARE wrong about Trfel. Plz see the light.
|
On August 27 2015 23:54 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:51 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it. Meh I think we're stuck on semantics I think lol Truffles wafflies are town truffle though. He amuses me when he argues with himself in his own posts
I disagree with this.
He got hardread town by an entire game by posting in exactly that way.
|
On August 27 2015 23:54 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
what mean you?
Variation of a gb only less bad/adhd
|
On August 27 2015 23:55 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:53 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
Wut Explain this plz For.... future reference Nope ^^ if i'm right i'll be able to read you and that's too valuable XP
Plz nobody can read me. Marv and sort of palmar are the only ones who come close
FINE ILL JUST HAVE TO REMEMBER TO SCATTER AS SCUM NEXT TIME
|
On August 27 2015 23:55 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:54 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:51 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it. Meh I think we're stuck on semantics I think lol Truffles wafflies are town truffle though. He amuses me when he argues with himself in his own posts I disagree with this. He got hardread town by an entire game by posting in exactly that way.
No he didn't
|
On August 27 2015 23:55 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:54 KelsierSC wrote:On August 27 2015 23:52 rsoultin wrote:
Wave too scattered to be scum I think...if i'm right take this to the bank lol
what mean you? Variation of a gb only less bad/adhd
I can read GB like a book now and it has nothing to do with how scatter brained he is :D
|
Add to that the fact that he calls both myself AND JAT mafia and votes for NEITHER of us - which is really odd considering JAT was (and is?) the current vote leader. So he doesn't want to lynch JAT? Why not the other mafias he's reading? Why an inactive that could just be AFK town?
|
I get that you don't see the difference wave but it's there sorry :/
|
On August 27 2015 23:56 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2015 23:55 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:54 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:51 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:48 rsoultin wrote:On August 27 2015 23:45 WaveofShadow wrote:On August 27 2015 23:44 rsoultin wrote:
I'm really good at reading truffle though and he obviously was filter diving everyone which invalidates your entire case ve
Nothing changed ksc How does that invalidate his case? Plus he filter dives everyone as scum Tina. Go get some ham. The inconsistency is based on different responses to the same post so his point is invalid given a filter dive often gives different impressions? The case is townie but the conclusion is wrong I think lol It doesn't invalidate his case but maybe you pinpoint why I'm unconvinced by it. Meh I think we're stuck on semantics I think lol Truffles wafflies are town truffle though. He amuses me when he argues with himself in his own posts I disagree with this. He got hardread town by an entire game by posting in exactly that way. No he didn't
Ask him.
Or moosy.
Or anyone else who was in that game with us.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 27 2015 23:57 VisceraEyes wrote:
Add to that the fact that he calls both myself AND JAT mafia and votes for NEITHER of us - which is really odd considering JAT was (and is?) the current vote leader. So he doesn't want to lynch JAT? Why not the other mafias he's reading? Why an inactive that could just be AFK town?
this is pretty valid tbh
|
TINA I'M TALKING DIRECTLY TO YOU GIRL! DON'T IGNORE ME!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
