Tropical Storm Mini Mafia - Page 29

On August 12 2015 23:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
basically yes. most people were quite bad in reading motivation back then and even the good one's weren'ty really "challenged" because there was so much bad. .... and people were generally not posting much so it was hard.

On August 12 2015 23:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
i totally forgot purplehaze is in the game. There is something he'll probably do if he is mafia. I don't think he has done anything alignment indicative yet.

I am amused how can people trust a tone read over actual post-based evidence that a guy is clearly just fucking pulling shit out of his ass. I am sad.

On August 12 2015 14:40 Trfel wrote:
Why do you say this? I don't see ruXxar being excited about anything, or eager to investigate/push/discuss anything. And I also don't see ruXxar looking ahead and being productive like he says he will, like you townread him for doing (as of the time you made this post, anyway). Please explain.

On August 12 2015 23:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
i totally forgot purplehaze is in the game. There is something he'll probably do if he is mafia. I don't think he has done anything alignment indicative yet.

I am amused how can people trust a tone read over actual post-based evidence that a guy is clearly just fucking pulling shit out of his ass. I am sad.

I might look like a drunk rager, but all I want is a little love and a hug.

On August 12 2015 23:15 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I see Ruxx as being eager to post and continuously explaining his situation, fighting every argument being brought against him (in however poor way he's doing so) and attempting to contribute.?

On August 12 2015 23:12 rsoultin wrote:


i know what you're keying in on, rayn

you're saying how can the guy have different reactions to the same post, whether he's forgotten it or not? and as i said, the whole flavor of his posting is somewhat different this game so i'm not as sure on it here as i was in desert, but i still wouldn't lynch him today. lol i call it tone but it's actually behavior/personality-based and yes i do tend to put more value on a read that considers overarching play over one or two consistencies

especially when being inconsistent isn't outside the norm for ruxxy :/

On August 12 2015 23:22 rsoultin wrote:
thoughts on condor, then?

or prp lol ><

On August 12 2015 06:01 deconduo wrote:


Like tell people not to claim their hurricane name. Cos apparently that's pretty useful.

On August 12 2015 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:

no.

On August 12 2015 23:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:

My case i posted is in fact 50% bullshit just because i just realized i misread one of his posts where he says "a post about artanis" into "artanis' post".

So what he is doing is he is agreeing that i am right when he SHOULD know i am pushing something he hasn't even actually said or done. Like rsoultin, if someone now made a case on you based on "you called rayn town then now you suddenly call him mafia for no reason" would your response be:
1) "i have not called rayn mafia" or,
2) "yeah i did woopiedoo"

????

On August 12 2015 23:27 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Deconduo is weird. His posts haven't had any focus. Actually he might be my preferred lynch candidate for today but something really silly is making me hedge, which is this:

The arrogance in that even when he hasn't really done much leads me to believe he actually believes he's contributing, so meh.

Prp is still null to me.

yes.

On August 12 2015 23:28 prplhz wrote:
maybe you're scum for not immediately getting that "a post about artanis" into "artanis' post"?

On August 12 2015 23:29 rsoultin wrote:


heh. kinda weak, artie

if you two just yes and no back and forth you'll be beaten with more than just a wet noodle

On August 12 2015 23:27 rsoultin wrote:

o.0

this happened? where? that's not at all what i remember from y'all's argument, though i guess i was kinda reading the thread with a headache yesterday and wishing you all would just choke on bile lol ><

On August 12 2015 07:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like i am trying to be as clear as possible:

ruxxar says one of Vivax/Hopeless is mafia
Vivax makes a post.
He says one of them "looks a bit better"
He pushes Vivax (with questioning, but it is essentially the same thing because if he thought Hopeless was mafia then he would Q him instead) also see green
People call him out for the read because it is not clear who is he even talking about
I ask him "which one does look a bit better" (because i have just voted for hopeless)
He says random other things
I tell him to answer clearly
He says "Vivax looks better"
I ask why do you question Vivax then instead of Hopeless?
He says, "because i thought this green post made was by artanis. I fucked up"
I ask him "why did you then push Vivax based on the SAME post. Like if that post is from Artanis (as you thought) why are you pushing Vivax for that post?

dudeeeesssS????

On August 12 2015 04:08 ruXxar wrote:


I just did.
Woopdeedoo.

On August 12 2015 23:30 rsoultin wrote:


reads would be amazing. much as i adore assholes, with your ton of nothing this game, you're wearing my patience

On August 12 2015 23:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:

My argument was literally this:


I bolded and underlined the parts that did not actually happen. That's what my argument has always been, yet ruxxar's answer was:

he has never in fact "missed order of things".
He has only made two conclusions on a same post.

Like if you are town why the fuck would you not correct this to people?
why? whywhywhy?

On August 12 2015 20:21 Palmar wrote:
rsoultin and trfel go to townpile

damdred to scumpile

need more info