TL Mafia LXXI: Gaiden - Page 5

On July 08 2015 02:54 boxerfred wrote:
Oats still has not delivered anything useful by the way. Only responding, derailing, not throwing in anything that would bringt town any further.

On July 08 2015 02:05 boxerfred wrote:
So let me just throw out that I'm really unsure about HtS and KSC's alignments. I remember Kelsier being way more active and way better as town in the (one..) game I played with him. And I remember that HtS pretty much had the same "I post long posts without pushing too hard" tone in the game where she was scum.

ritoky's claim is weak af, I'd prefer to lynch between Oats and Clarity, who are my top scum reads. I'm fine with lynching ritoky if the majority goes for him though. WoS is also fine.

On July 08 2015 02:46 boxerfred wrote:
I'm saying we lynch Oats over ritoky because Oats is actively throwing more trash in the thread.

On July 08 2015 04:55 boxerfred wrote:
I don't think I'll vote for ritoky today. Said before why (not lynching un-cc'ed blue claim if I have other reads).

On July 08 2015 01:56 boxerfred wrote:

I do absolutely not understand the town lean in breshke, clarity and LS.

oats - I liked the xp read on rsoul initially, been up in people's face

Clarity - The initial posts weren't great but perhaps he was
just excited to play, I really liked his scum read on WoS, he had pressure
on him but he scumread the one guy sort of townreading him out of nowhere
that felt really good. since then his posting has been solid, comments about
trefl and bf seem alright.

On July 08 2015 20:20 boxerfred wrote:

Because that's what I do when I get frustrated over afk lynches that flip town when there's way better people to lynch. Noballs town.

I'm fine with lynching ritoky if the majority goes for him though.

On July 10 2015 19:06 marvellosity wrote:

you know you might get lynched if you don't find some energy from somewhere at some point, right?

On July 11 2015 04:50 Half the Sky wrote:


That's sort of the point I was trying to progress with the first half of my case. The parts about geript and Damdred.

For geript he clarified his stance. At that time why did you still want to kill him? I'll try and break this down for you - when I was reading your filter he is clarifying himself and then you go to say "I don't want to distract from killing geript, etc etc" (paraphrasing, see the quote I posted AFTER my case) so that tells me you are still very much wanting to lynch him then.

Shouldn't your opinion have changed? Or did you have a reason at that time it did not? That is what I was driving at.

On July 11 2015 05:01 Half the Sky wrote:


So now that you are on board with lynching Damdred, etc. Where do you stand on the rest? If you assume there's 1-2 within the claims, do you even have a hunch of where other scumreads could be?

I assume WoS and MZ are (still??) on your list, if they are not then whom?

On July 11 2015 05:31 KelsierSC wrote:
Vivax , what do you think of boxer at this point?

On July 11 2015 06:06 ruXxar wrote:
@Vivax.

I'm really curious what you meant with this quote:


It seems like you're somehow sad that an opportunity to jump on a trfel scum train went away.
This was the last time you mentioned trfel in your filter and it was N1.

On July 11 2015 06:35 ruXxar wrote:


I think damdred flips red.
Damdred is playing totally different from the last game.
Way too mellow for my taste.