to me it's like
tina! why is the sky red?
but it's blue?
why is it red?
it's not?
>< why won't you give me a straight answer? why is the sky red, tina?!
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 14:50 GMT
#5382
to me it's like tina! why is the sky red? but it's blue? why is it red? it's not? >< why won't you give me a straight answer? why is the sky red, tina?! | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 14:53 GMT
#5386
On July 11 2015 23:51 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:48 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:43 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:40 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:35 rsoultin wrote: \o/ i'm out for a bit ![]() btw ruxx, you no longer care about asking me the same question over and over, or did you finally actually read what i've been saying all along? xP I've just come to terms with that I won't get a clear answer out of you regarding trfel. Sorry, no offense. not offended what don't you understand, though? i thought i explained it pretty damn clearly, frankly I expressed my thoughts in this post I don't understand the motivation for disrupting people trying to question Trfel. I understand that HF probably was a bit mean, but you should let the mod handle that. You're not Trfel's mommy. He can take care of himself. demonstrate where i disrupted people trying to question trfel, because i didn't xP uh.... you spent the whole of d1 arguing with HF who was just trying to push trfel i was trying to push hf -_- if you want to call it deflection and assume we're both scum, that's one thing | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 14:55 GMT
#5389
On July 11 2015 23:51 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:48 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:43 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:40 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:35 rsoultin wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQEDwjhaDE \o/ i'm out for a bit ![]() btw ruxx, you no longer care about asking me the same question over and over, or did you finally actually read what i've been saying all along? xP I've just come to terms with that I won't get a clear answer out of you regarding trfel. Sorry, no offense. not offended what don't you understand, though? i thought i explained it pretty damn clearly, frankly I expressed my thoughts in this post I don't understand the motivation for disrupting people trying to question Trfel. I understand that HF probably was a bit mean, but you should let the mod handle that. You're not Trfel's mommy. He can take care of himself. demonstrate where i disrupted people trying to question trfel, because i didn't xP This post: Show nested quote + On July 08 2015 08:50 ruXxar wrote: On July 08 2015 07:52 rsoultin wrote: On July 08 2015 07:44 ruXxar wrote: @rsoultin. HF, was putting pressure on trfel. And well founded pressure too with the way trfel has been playing this game. Putting pressure on people is a good thing, it's an excellent tool for extracting information. Yet you seem to have a problem with people putting pressure on trfel, and you guard him like a watch dog. The issue is not that you came with your opinion on trfel, that is completely fine and legit. The problem is that you acted irrationally and actively tried to disrupt and deny us information out of Trfel. When someone observes a contradiction or inconsistency in what people say and they question them about it, the most anti-town thing you can do is try to interject and derail the questioning, which is exactly what you did. Tell me this, why are you defending Trfel when he is perfectly capable of defending himself? Furthermore, he might be mafia, so why are you so adamant about defending someone without knowing their alignment? Your goal as town should be to get as much information out of anyone as to form a basis of judgement on. Blindly defending people as town is an incredibly bad way to play. Combined with your other actions this game, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. do you even begin to realize how difficult it is for me to even bother finish reading this pile of shit when it's clear you didn't bother to actually READ our interaction? go away, or actually fact check your own fucking claims i've answered all your leading questions already i've formed my judgment on truffle and until i actually see anything to indicate otherwise, you can bite me i was right on gb. i was right on damdy. i was right on bugs. i was right on hf. i was right on you. and i was right on wave and oats. but instead of CONSIDERING after seeing my play last game and losing the game while ignoring my advice in your newbie, that i might actually have a good fucking toneread on truffle you try to paint it as me denying information? lol >< I read your interaction just fine. Let me recap my view of it, just so you can correct me if I'm missing something. 1st interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "Trfel you are playing like burnt out mafia" RS: "I don't think he is, but I'll find out soon for sure" HF: "I don't need your opinion RS" RS: "Trfel is town, your reads are wrong!". HF: "I don't need you go away". Mod: Interrupts. 2nd interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "I wanted to force Trfel to present his argument in a logical manner" RS: "HF is misrepresenting me and being a dick, I don't mind if you question Trfel" HF: (Posts quotes where you disrupted him from questioning) RS: "You were trying to shit on me!" HF: "I don't deny being a dick, but I was trying to pressure trfel to gain information" RS: "Stop questioning him so early! Let's talk about something else" (topic changed) 3rd interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "Trfel there's an inconsistency in your read on LS, explain why". RS: "HF, you can't read!" RS: "I want to let trfel answer for himself, but you guys are too stupid!" HF: "How is that not reading?" RS: "Trfel already explained it!" HF: "Explained it how?" RS: "HTS saw the questioning, why don't you get it?" HF: "How does that explain him changing his stance?" RS: "You are stupid HF!" (Shitfight ensues, questioning derailed) It's all pretty obvious disruption from my point of view. Once again you're derailing. I'm not going away anytime soon. i am not going to go line-by-line with this post and actually point out all the things you're misrepresenting or leaving out, ruxxar. it's not worth my time, and it insults your intelligence i want you to quote actual posts where i was actively disrupting people getting a read on trfel not repost a made-up dialogue | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 14:56 GMT
#5391
On July 11 2015 23:54 Harkon wrote: Why are you discussing this shit again? Does anyone think it will be more productive than the last 10 times? i have my reasons, jat. namely, i want to see if his reasoning makes any sense | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 14:59 GMT
#5394
On July 11 2015 23:57 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2015 23:54 Harkon wrote: Why are you discussing this shit again? Does anyone think it will be more productive than the last 10 times? That's why I said I'd come to terms with not getting a clear answer. I don't want to shit up the thread again. if you can keep a straight head i can? marv's right. i think you're scum right now because of how you've approached me. but maybe i'm just not seeing what you're getting at? so i want you to explain to me which posts made you think i was disrupting people from getting reads on trfel | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:01 GMT
#5397
On July 12 2015 00:00 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2015 23:55 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:51 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:48 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:43 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:40 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:35 rsoultin wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQEDwjhaDE \o/ i'm out for a bit ![]() btw ruxx, you no longer care about asking me the same question over and over, or did you finally actually read what i've been saying all along? xP I've just come to terms with that I won't get a clear answer out of you regarding trfel. Sorry, no offense. not offended what don't you understand, though? i thought i explained it pretty damn clearly, frankly I expressed my thoughts in this post I don't understand the motivation for disrupting people trying to question Trfel. I understand that HF probably was a bit mean, but you should let the mod handle that. You're not Trfel's mommy. He can take care of himself. demonstrate where i disrupted people trying to question trfel, because i didn't xP This post: On July 08 2015 08:50 ruXxar wrote: On July 08 2015 07:52 rsoultin wrote: On July 08 2015 07:44 ruXxar wrote: @rsoultin. HF, was putting pressure on trfel. And well founded pressure too with the way trfel has been playing this game. Putting pressure on people is a good thing, it's an excellent tool for extracting information. Yet you seem to have a problem with people putting pressure on trfel, and you guard him like a watch dog. The issue is not that you came with your opinion on trfel, that is completely fine and legit. The problem is that you acted irrationally and actively tried to disrupt and deny us information out of Trfel. When someone observes a contradiction or inconsistency in what people say and they question them about it, the most anti-town thing you can do is try to interject and derail the questioning, which is exactly what you did. Tell me this, why are you defending Trfel when he is perfectly capable of defending himself? Furthermore, he might be mafia, so why are you so adamant about defending someone without knowing their alignment? Your goal as town should be to get as much information out of anyone as to form a basis of judgement on. Blindly defending people as town is an incredibly bad way to play. Combined with your other actions this game, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. do you even begin to realize how difficult it is for me to even bother finish reading this pile of shit when it's clear you didn't bother to actually READ our interaction? go away, or actually fact check your own fucking claims i've answered all your leading questions already i've formed my judgment on truffle and until i actually see anything to indicate otherwise, you can bite me i was right on gb. i was right on damdy. i was right on bugs. i was right on hf. i was right on you. and i was right on wave and oats. but instead of CONSIDERING after seeing my play last game and losing the game while ignoring my advice in your newbie, that i might actually have a good fucking toneread on truffle you try to paint it as me denying information? lol >< I read your interaction just fine. Let me recap my view of it, just so you can correct me if I'm missing something. 1st interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "Trfel you are playing like burnt out mafia" RS: "I don't think he is, but I'll find out soon for sure" HF: "I don't need your opinion RS" RS: "Trfel is town, your reads are wrong!". HF: "I don't need you go away". Mod: Interrupts. 2nd interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "I wanted to force Trfel to present his argument in a logical manner" RS: "HF is misrepresenting me and being a dick, I don't mind if you question Trfel" HF: (Posts quotes where you disrupted him from questioning) RS: "You were trying to shit on me!" HF: "I don't deny being a dick, but I was trying to pressure trfel to gain information" RS: "Stop questioning him so early! Let's talk about something else" (topic changed) 3rd interaction: Starts here Recap: HF: "Trfel there's an inconsistency in your read on LS, explain why". RS: "HF, you can't read!" RS: "I want to let trfel answer for himself, but you guys are too stupid!" HF: "How is that not reading?" RS: "Trfel already explained it!" HF: "Explained it how?" RS: "HTS saw the questioning, why don't you get it?" HF: "How does that explain him changing his stance?" RS: "You are stupid HF!" (Shitfight ensues, questioning derailed) It's all pretty obvious disruption from my point of view. Once again you're derailing. I'm not going away anytime soon. i am not going to go line-by-line with this post and actually point out all the things you're misrepresenting or leaving out, ruxxar. it's not worth my time, and it insults your intelligence i want you to quote actual posts where i was actively disrupting people getting a read on trfel not repost a made-up dialogue That dialogue is based on real quotes. I can post the quotes I made the recap from instead if that makes you happy. you think the entire dialogues were me disrupting people from getting reads on trfel? so what don't you agree with in that big post i wrote about them? like i said, i thought i was very clear, but you still kept asking. so what don't you understand? | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:04 GMT
#5401
On July 12 2015 00:03 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2015 23:59 rsoultin wrote: On July 11 2015 23:57 ruXxar wrote: On July 11 2015 23:54 Harkon wrote: Why are you discussing this shit again? Does anyone think it will be more productive than the last 10 times? That's why I said I'd come to terms with not getting a clear answer. I don't want to shit up the thread again. if you can keep a straight head i can? marv's right. i think you're scum right now because of how you've approached me. but maybe i'm just not seeing what you're getting at? so i want you to explain to me which posts made you think i was disrupting people from getting reads on trfel This is what I'll do. Since you think the paraphrasing is misrepresenting what you did, I'll just put together the quotes instead. Give me some time. not if you're just going to quote everything that's superfluous if you think the entire behavior as a whole was disruptive, then what don't you get/agree with in my explanation of it? i can requote the post if you don't remember | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:05 GMT
#5402
On July 08 2015 23:08 rsoultin wrote: okay ruxxar. i've explained it all, but not concisely and not politely because i'm not polite but i'll do it solely to have it in one place and to say this is the last time i am going to discuss my trfel toneread or my interactions/read on hf, whether you keep ignoring that and tunneling with the same points or not reasons i'm tonereading truffle town: lightness with me (i catch him as mafia early, see student v where i opened with pressure on truffle for his weird read on ls, and greymist's game), joking that matches his dry humor, grumbling at me for saying i thought he was town (look at it this way: as scum he should be happy that he gets an rsoul townread and finally broke my streak...as town it makes a lot more sense to be irritated that i'm still getting a read off him off very few posts), and yes, not wanting to give an opinion on something he hasn't looked at is actually towny cause truffle holds himself to ridiculously high standards and spends an inordinate amount of time combing through posts before coming to a decision <- all of these things are very personal that i realize other people don't know about him and mean more to me than others, so i didn't go into it, just as i didn't go into it with my early toneread on damdy in himalayas the first exchange with hf: you're misrepresenting/misreading it. when hf first said he didn't need my opinion i let it go. i was actually discussing things with bresh and truffle when hf said "see, this post means his question to you wasn't trying to determine your alignment"...to which i responded that i didn't think that was the purpose of the question anyway and made a joke about hf forgetting how stubborn i was...he then basically told me to shut up and go into a corner and color, so yeah, i got pissed at him. i actually broke it off BEFORE the mod ever intervened, which frankly was probably for the post hf made right before the mod post...because that was ad hominem to a tee, basically saying no one gives a shit what i say because of my tonereads subsequently: i came back to the thread scumreading hf because i'd had time to cool down and where he said he was questioning truffle, he actually was saying, and yes i'm paraphrasing "you're scum cause you have mafiaitis. nothing you can say or do will change my mind. you may as well give up". plus the way he just threw shit at me when i wasn't doing anything. usually we only shitfight when he's scum, and i JUST came off a game where he and bugs did that to deliberately put me on tilt cause i'm fiery -_- i kept trying to get people to see what i was seeing and he kept on trying to say i was defending truffle and everyone else was taking that up, and it was supremely frustrating that people kept not understanding what i was trying to say...that hf never intended to get a read off truffle in the first place that continued with ignoring the fact that truffle was quizzing ls between the time of his townread and scumread on ls and had said he was writing something on him, instead just going hey! look! nothing has happened between these reads! me saying he's not reading was his clue to go back and read. hts did it. she saw it. hf should have. he preferred to fight me instead the only reason i left off hf was his point on truffle's case all coming from before he dropped the townread was actually good. i even tried to explain what my issue with him was more concisely, which works better when i'm not angry. it's still weird to me that he thinks telling someone they're scum and he won't ever change his mind is pressure, but i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment since yeah, even if he's scum not gonna lynch him d1 like ever >< was more productive to discuss reads but here i come back to the thread and he's back to jumping on me for nitnoidisms as for you, you're just parroting him like you two are butt buddies, and it feels a lot like being double-teamed...deja vu bugs and hf...plus i KNOW that you've seen i do this toneread thing and am willing to fight for it regardless if the so-called "evidence" when it comes to an actual lynch; see: GB, so why you find it so weird i'm doing it again this game i can't fathom most of this i've already said now i will ignore you unless you talk about something else or are actually willing to talk reads instead of whining about me being pissed at your misrepresentation and inattentiveness was that polite enough? also, yeah...i didn't get through the thread @.@ i'd just post a reads list, but it would only be for the sake of posting it cause it's outdated i really don't like hf still, or ruxx (though this could be OMGUS i'm willing to admit), and damdy felt off to me, too, but i want to read the section of the day i missed that had people scumreading him before i come to a judgment on that beyond that i think bresh/truffle/marv/geript are top townies for me...would add palmar to that but lol my track record with palmar >< someone else can read him ^ i went into great detail here | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:13 GMT
#5403
| ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:16 GMT
#5404
On July 11 2015 23:52 Vivax wrote: rso disrupting people while they try to form reads on others is perfectly within her town meta I can assure you heh xP you hate this about my play, but i honestly don't see it. like i really don't get how stating my own opinions on things is any different than anyone else stating theirs? not that this really matters, but this is just not the first time you've said something like this lol >< | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:20 GMT
#5406
On July 12 2015 00:19 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2015 00:13 rsoultin wrote: ...i get the feeling i'm about to see a spoiler full of about 10 pages worth of quotes lol >< That's not what I'm putting together. I'm putting together the quotes I based my paraphrasing on, which you said was incorrect and misrepresenting you. that's pointless because part of the problem, ruxxar, is you're omitting chunks of the exchange in your "paraphrase" anyway just explain to me what your problem is? it shouldn't be hard to explain when you've been pushing it this long | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:25 GMT
#5409
On July 12 2015 00:22 marvellosity wrote: let him do his thing, and if you don't like what it is, you can have discussion after it's less not liking what it is, marv, and more already knowing what he's going to post and i'd rather not spend hours doing something that should be easily resolved or at least explained in 20 minutes >< him reposting all those posts doesn't explain why he sees them as disruptive or why he's ignoring all the ones in between so it's just not...eh whatever. he's gonna do what he wants anyway | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:28 GMT
#5413
On July 12 2015 00:24 geript wrote: Marv have you read Tina's filter? are you planning on ever posting your read? lol >< | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:28 GMT
#5414
| ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:32 GMT
#5416
On July 12 2015 00:29 geript wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2015 00:26 marvellosity wrote: On July 12 2015 00:24 geript wrote: Marv have you read Tina's filter? not a chance ![]() Well do it and use control+f to search for Damdred. I just find it really exceptionally odd how often she talks about not liking his LS read (or reads in general) while not seeming to have an opinion on Damdred whatsoever. ??? i don't ctrl+f my own filter cause that's retarded, but i know that i talked about him quite frequently? | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:34 GMT
#5418
| ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:41 GMT
#5419
i usually refer to damdred as "damdy" and sometimes elongate it to "daaaamdy" or something lol you miss about 50 posts if you spell his name the correct way xP | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:47 GMT
#5423
i do kinda get it cause yeah i thought i talked about him more than i did...his ls read was bugging me a lot but i got distracted lol @.@ | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:48 GMT
#5424
On July 12 2015 00:47 Holyflare wrote: I don't know what rsoultin has done since she has caught up other than repeat what we already discussed last night that milo was a bad shot and say it like its a new opinion. i'm withholding reads like a boss ^^ | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
July 11 2015 15:49 GMT
#5425
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g12303 JimRising ![]() shahzam748 WinterStarcraft284 Livibee231 Maynarde175 ViBE145 Skadoodle128 UpATreeSC106 SortOf33 RuFF_SC220 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya StarCraft: Brood War![]() • practicex ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|