|
On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:12 KelsierSC wrote:
Clarity do you have any other reads so far? I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that. trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum?
I said we can't both be scum
Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful.
|
On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:12 KelsierSC wrote:
Clarity do you have any other reads so far? I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that. trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right?
You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little.
I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree?
|
On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:12 KelsierSC wrote:
Clarity do you have any other reads so far? I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that. trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum
OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on.
If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"?
What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me.
|
On July 06 2015 08:30 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:28 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
[quote]
I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that.
trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times
Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on. If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"? What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me. well...i feel like if you hadn't brusied the back of my throat with it then i might have made that analysis myself. but now it just tastes like pre.... well it just tastes bad you know.
That's fine, just don't lynch HF or myself today and reevaluate tomorrow. Moving on.
WoS gave me a townread for being tryhard, whereas there's 3 people somewhat leaning towards me or whatever.
So is WoS just better than you guys, or is he scum?
|
On July 06 2015 08:33 Holyflare wrote:
considering you did 0 things, waves post is 0% correct and likely mafia wave
I knew I liked you.
|
On July 06 2015 08:38 Damdred wrote:It's a bit of a gut/tone read I have going on her. Her little spat with clarity she was a bit of a pita and her not hostility but uhhh exaggeration makes me feel it's town rd, plus the follow up makes me feel it
I felt the opposite because she was basically just poking at my posts but not trying to get anywhere, is this a meta thing you're talking about? Soft-pushing is pretty much scum101. Not that I'm convinced either way, which is why I asked for thoughts on her, ruxxar replied strangely enough.
On July 06 2015 08:39 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:34 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:33 Holyflare wrote:
considering you did 0 things, waves post is 0% correct and likely mafia wave I knew I liked you. Please answer my question. Also this seems like an odd statement because a previous post read like you were really happy with wave? Just seems a weird postings
I gave out a townread super early because I wanted to get the game started, I don't think it's that great to give out mass townreads unless it's necessary.
I don't think I said was happy with wave?
|
geript, still happy with your vote? Would love to have some reasoning.
In the mean time, WoS gave me a very lazy townread. I'd like to think I always look townie but not a lot of people seem to agree at this point so it smells like he has extra info.
##Vote WaveOfShadow
|
Holyflare you should vote WoS with me it'll be great
|
On July 06 2015 09:17 Damdred wrote:
Clar will you respond to the post I made please, reading it over I still reading it as you like wos town reading you rather than leaning scum.
Don't know what to tell you other than that wasn't my intention. I was pointing out that either WoS sees something the others don't or WoS has other information.
|
On July 06 2015 09:21 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 09:20 Holyflare wrote:On July 06 2015 09:17 geript wrote:On July 06 2015 09:14 Holyflare wrote:On July 06 2015 08:38 geript wrote:
@HF who are your townreads.
Oh and btw Wubby is 100% town. Player List 1) Marvellosity2) Scott31337 3) WaveofShadow (filter)4) Clarity_nl (filter)5) ruXxar (filter) <--- pretty sure 12) Trfel (filter)16) KelsierSC (filter) 20) Damdred (filter)21) rsoultin (filter)24) Holyflare (filter) I'm not sure if you're right on Damdred. I'm sure you're wrong on wave. I agree about Ruxx. The big thing though is that you're wrong on Wave. He's town. i don't care what you think about wave tbh so cool You better start caring because you're not going to lynch him because I don't get to play with him often and we're both town. So find a different lynch to push.
geript could you expand on your vote on me and your WoS townread? Like you haven't explained either of them
|
On July 06 2015 09:22 Damdred wrote:
On one level I really like the explanation even though it's super obvious.
On another though, you had to wait on hf to point it out and instantly sheeped it instead of taking it yourself. So it just feels weird
Uh.. He answered my question regarding WoS, if anything he sheeped me. Read again
|
Trfl I was distinctly null but your last post:
+ Show Spoiler +On July 06 2015 17:28 Trfel wrote:Pointless Conversation+ Show Spoiler +On July 06 2015 07:30 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 07:20 Trfel wrote:Hi. I need to go take a sauna now. Raynpelikoneet would approve, I assume  I'll probably be mostly active in the evenings, lately I've been busier during the day. So if you scumread me for lack of activity or lack of active discussion, you'll be wrong. Anyway, this should be a fun (if spammy) game. And an easy win. Scum, you don't have a chance. but, but, but... this was our favorite! ;o; judas Yes, but you see the song I linked has a (terrible) connection to the point I am attempting to convey. "Sports Song" is my favorite from Weird Al's recent songs, anyway.
On July 06 2015 07:31 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 07:29 Vivax wrote:On July 06 2015 07:28 geript wrote:On July 06 2015 07:26 LightningStrike wrote:On July 06 2015 07:24 Holyflare wrote:
##vote trfel
Super over explained afk entry excuse post You already got a vote on someone like he's scum it not going to be just his entrance it would be for other things as the game goes on... Scum #2 I've caught. Must be a lot of mafia in this game when you catch them while less than half the game didn't even post. There's five, did you read the OP or just being Vivax? Do you normally miss jokes?
On July 06 2015 08:15 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:13 scott31337 wrote:On July 06 2015 08:09 ruXxar wrote:
I say we vote Trfel, scummy as fuck yup! Although I didn't really care for his AFK post, he has proven he can be a big poster as mafia (like his last game) I'm not on the trfel train yet - or was this sarcastic? it's cool i'm the trfel whisperer xP just sheep me whenever he gets his ass back to the thread and actually starts posting lol >< he always pre-writes his entrances before his role pm like a pussy Do not! Only that one time.... If you must know, I wrote my entrance post for this game after the Day post....
On July 06 2015 08:19 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:15 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:13 scott31337 wrote:On July 06 2015 08:09 ruXxar wrote:
I say we vote Trfel, scummy as fuck yup! Although I didn't really care for his AFK post, he has proven he can be a big poster as mafia (like his last game) I'm not on the trfel train yet - or was this sarcastic? it's cool i'm the trfel whisperer xP just sheep me whenever he gets his ass back to the thread and actually starts posting lol >< he always pre-writes his entrances before his role pm like a pussy I dare you to say you can still read trfel after we destroyed town that other game. Thanks for the confidence WaveofShadow, but she most definitely can read me...
On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:12 KelsierSC wrote:
Clarity do you have any other reads so far? I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that. trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? I don't even....
On July 06 2015 08:33 rsoultin wrote:
chem work to do... Well now I'm feeling pretty stupid...
On July 06 2015 11:20 milo109 wrote:
Hmmm. I feel like I should post more but I don't have much more. Leaning town on Holyflare, and I want to call WaveofShadow also town. But I can't. This is really stupid, but I think this post actually gets him a town lean...
Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 12:30 LightningStrike wrote:On July 06 2015 12:29 milo109 wrote:
Alright you people are boring. I'll be back in the morning. When you wake up care to give me your thoughts? Has LightningStrike ever used phrasing like this before?
At the moment, I'm most suspicious of (in no order) scott31337, LightningStrike, and Holyflare. I'm suspicious of LightningStrike partially because of what Damdred said. While Damdred's point wasn't great, LightningStrike's response (looking up the games that were missing from his initial post) seems very telling. Furthermore, I don't think that LightningStrike has ever used the phrasing in the above quote as town. Usually, he says "please give me your reads" or "what are your reads, please" or something like that. In contrast, "care to give me your thoughts" is far more reserved. And the rest of LightningStrike's posting in this game is far more aggressive than I'm used to seeing from him. It feels like the strongest argument against LightningStrike is how his play has been affected by the pressure he's been under. As people bring up different things, he posts in different ways as a result. Side note, why are girls so confusing.... (and no, I'm not talking about anyone in this game)
Seems distinctly worthless.
You took the time to spoiler up a bunch of posts you found were "useless" and then made useless replies to them, none of which contributes anything.
Then you post your "most suspicious" list which includes two people I'm very happy to call town, and although I kinda agree with LS I don't agree with any of the reasons you've posted. How is "Please give me your reads" so different from "care to give me your thoughts" that it makes it a phrasing that only mafia!LS would use?
You say his tone changed but you do not point out how. I don't see it. All I see are his low-content posts and he had a weak entry into the thread, that's all.
This reeks of jumping onto a wagon but trying to make up your own reasons because you don't want to appear to be sheeping.
|
Palmar and marv you've both around, time to solve the game right? So far nothing! Very dissapoint
|
Alright well I expect greatness. People calling you scum cause scum!marv doesn't like playing scum so doesn't try as hard, which they're kinda right and kinda wrong about. I think you try quadruply hard as scum to not fail your team, so show us what ya got.
|
On July 06 2015 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv??
Do you have any reads at all?
Read the thread please? I came back, commented on trfl and then marv showed up so I said hi.
On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote:
I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel?
I think self-aware wandered claim is fine. The cop claims were obviously just people being silly,
|
On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
What?
|
I have no idea which post you're talking about. Maybe it's time to actually use your brainwords?
|
On July 06 2015 20:21 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
here this one
I still don't know what this post is referring to.
|
On July 06 2015 20:23 Palmar wrote:
##vote clarity_nl
Now that we're ganging up on you, how do you feel clarity?
Not really bothered. I thought you said you were undecided on me, what changed your mind?
|
On July 06 2015 20:23 boxerfred wrote:to this one: Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:43 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv??
Do you have any reads at all?
Read the thread please? I came back, commented on trfl and then marv showed up so I said hi. On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote:
I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel? I think self-aware wandered claim is fine. The cop claims were obviously just people being silly,
So your problem is that I answered Oats' questions and that I told you the cop claims were obviously silly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
