Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 89

On June 19 2015 04:35 LightningStrike wrote:

Do I really to explain more? I like Bugs case on you and you do have some similar stuff from your past games as scum simple as that.

On June 19 2015 04:34 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok, let's try it in another way.

KelsierSC, VayneAuthority, LightningStrike, Holyflare:

Tell me exactly WHY are you voting me.

On June 19 2015 04:35 KelsierSC wrote:


yes but why are you literally asking everyone the same thing?
will yamatos thoughts alter your decision in some way?

On June 19 2015 04:36 Lohengramm wrote:
Also I literally forgot to vote earlier when I said I was going to vote. That's the ONLY reason I'm voting right now.

Jesus WBG don't fling shit for no reason.

On June 19 2015 04:37 GlowingBear wrote:


Yes, I want you to explain more

Go deeper than that.

What do you like on bugs case? What similar stuff from past scum games?

It's easy to base your vote by saying what you're saying.

On June 19 2015 04:37 KelsierSC wrote:


I started reading WBS as town with his post about bf.
He then raised some interesting points about you and summarised points of your play accurately
You then made a very weak case on breshke which was actually bad enough for you to be mafia
and then you also attempted to discredit and misrepresent WBG afterwards.
Add on the posts linked by VA and Shockey from previous games when you all caps

On June 19 2015 04:39 ritoky wrote:
choppa 4 wants to vote on migs or LS.

one of my town reads try to talk me into doing something else if you want.

On June 19 2015 04:39 NydusHerMain wrote:
You know we could be on two mafia. How awesome would that be

On June 19 2015 04:40 LightningStrike wrote:

Your all cap stuff is very similar to the all cap stuff you had when I was scum with you when you tried to divert the lynch away from me and away from you in GoT too plus some of your stuff and your reaction test seemed weird too.

On June 19 2015 04:39 ritoky wrote:
choppa 4 wants to vote on migs or LS.

one of my town reads try to talk me into doing something else if you want.

On June 19 2015 04:41 KelsierSC wrote:


can you be tempted by a cheeky GB vote?

On June 19 2015 04:42 wherebugsgo wrote:


why don't you consider voting someone who has an actual chance of getting lynched today?

We have like 3 hours, pretty unlikely Mig will get lynched and I don't see any good reasons to lynch him today. LS you can try to lynch him but he's not gonna flip red, I can pretty much guarantee you that at this point.

At this point the choice is pretty clear, if you think GB is town then explain to me what makes him town, otherwise vote him. Same goes for BF I guess. While I doubt you can convince me I am always open to new revelations.

On June 18 2015 16:57 ritoky wrote:
well everyone who wanted to find scum together kinda peaced out while i was gone. guess it is on me...or i could just get rid of LS.

but anywayz i went and looked at mig's filter cuz i don't know the fuck why, i just did. and this post stood out to me.



my imaginary awake person? hey choppa 4, why did that shit stand out to you?

yo that's a great question brochacho. because it seems like an unusual and weak reason to turn a read on a dime over. prior to this mig thought that LS was being scummy and there wasn't much of a reason to believe his claim or town read him. here he goes into great depth about it:



and expounding on it further here:



to summarize, mig thought in regards to LS that:
1) there's no reason to instantly believe his blue claim
2) that his onegu interaction was manufactured
3) that he was buddying people
4) that he gives non-committal reads
5) follows thread sentiment onto shockkey and doesn't believe he is mafia
6) copies most of his material from other players
7) discredits all meta arguments about him doing this as town prior.

those are 7 points as to why mig thinks LS isn't town and his claim shouldn't be believed. outside of his read on GB, LS is the player he has focused on the most, yet he completely 180s the read over 1 dumb tell. someone who put enough time, research, and filter diving into making posts structured and researched in the manner you have....you really want me to believe that 1 dumb tell invalidated 7 points? i am not buying what this guy is selling here. he could very well be mafia.

On June 19 2015 04:43 ritoky wrote:


he isn't overwhelmingly town to me, so if you had solid reasoning, lay it on me. not in huge post form, condensed form.

On June 19 2015 04:37 KelsierSC wrote:


I started reading WBS as town with his post about bf.
He then raised some interesting points about you and summarised points of your play accurately
You then made a very weak case on breshke which was actually bad enough for you to be mafia
and then you also attempted to discredit and misrepresent WBG afterwards.
Add on the posts linked by VA and Shockey from previous games when you all caps

On June 19 2015 04:46 GlowingBear wrote:
Kelsier, you're the strongest townread I have on my wagon.

Please consider me coming from town perspective and see if it couldn't happen.

On June 19 2015 02:56 boxerfred wrote:
ok so just a short explanation on why I'm gone: I'm having my oral exam tomorrow and I currently value learning stuff higher than playing. I do have the time to post but I don't want to spend it on that :/ sorry peeps. I'll tell you if I passed or not in another 24 hours.

On June 19 2015 04:34 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok, let's try it in another way.

KelsierSC, VayneAuthority, LightningStrike, Holyflare:

Tell me exactly WHY are you voting me.