Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 5

On June 17 2015 16:10 Breshke wrote:
I really don't like that post uhh

GB my scum list is like the top of your lynch list is it bad that they are all afk's

On June 17 2015 23:54 Onegu wrote:
GB and NHM town

On June 17 2015 23:54 Holyflare wrote:


i don't have to do anything lol

On June 17 2015 23:57 Onegu wrote:



Did you even read the onegu rule?

On June 18 2015 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:


wtf why are you jumping so hard on this opportunity to lynch an obvious townie

are you scum again?

On June 18 2015 04:50 wherebugsgo wrote:


people say "too anti-town to be town" when they really mean "I think that play was stupid and you deserve to die for it"

That kind of mentality literally ignores all possible motivational reads because it doesn't involve motivation at all and is simply a surface-level misinterpretation of what is going on. Try to think through it from the perspective of LS being scum and it makes no sense at all for him to do that

On June 18 2015 04:54 wherebugsgo wrote:
and my read on him is not a "too dumb to be scum" thing which falls into the same category as what I described. It is dumb, but you need to ignore the fact that it is a dumb play. Dumb plays are normally not alignment indicative. It's the fact that the play attracts attention that is important. A claim day 1 attracts too much attention to ever be made by scum. Scum counter claim and make claims in situations where they absolutely have to in order to win. When they don't they've usually made a huge mistake and they often get punished really hard for it. If LS were scum here he'd know that a fake claim on day 1 would cause him to take a lot of attention and he'd never do that because his style is to slide by without actually doing anything or taking any attention.

To call him scum for a play that is quite literally antithetical to his playstyle is quite possibly dumber than the play he did himself.

On June 18 2015 04:56 wherebugsgo wrote:


no, not right now. His last post here was enough for me to give him a slide:



While I think he is wrong on Kelsier he actually took some time to substantiate his counter point to me which I don't think scum would do that fast and on demand

On June 18 2015 05:04 Holyflare wrote:
like the only people to comment on boxerfreds posts are nydus and rsoultin, shame on all of you

On June 18 2015 05:01 wherebugsgo wrote:


If you're saying that you are truly terrible as town. He didn't do that last game and I didn't see him do that in the games that I read. If he has done it as scum before then it's probably complete coincidence, because the claim itself is not alignment indicative.

I don't know how many different ways I can say this but surface-level things are not indicators of anything. Stop using them in shitty ways to confirm your own biases.