EPTOn June 17 2015 12:59 Holyflare wrote:
eh i don't have any gripes with what she just posted
eh i don't have any gripes with what she just posted
well apart from the huge bs about me of course
Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
well apart from the huge bs about me of course | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
could you buddy me any more?  | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 13:22 rsoultin wrote: hey, you i'm town unvote me find scum a message from your friendly neighborhood rsoul ^^ even if i'm wrong i'm just WRONG, and none of what you're saying makes me scum any more than what bug's saying makes me scum i've got a role pm that says otherwise and i'm more confirmed than you ^^ On June 17 2015 07:03 Holyflare wrote: CONFIRMED TOWN BITCHES | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 13:27 rsoultin wrote: ... lol that's a good point, i didn't think about the confirmation timing and you say i did nothing with my vote -.- 3 Bill Murray + Show Spoiler + 4 ritoky - probably not just uneasy buddy wordz + Show Spoiler + 5 ShoCkeyy - maybe not, seems kind of new but not read the database of 5 games or w/e 6 Onegu 10 Fidei86 12 Mig + Show Spoiler + 13 GlowingBear - hahahahaha not read anything he wrote <3 + Show Spoiler + 14 LightningStrike - aprehensive, probably not 16 VayneAuthority 17 boxerfred super duper awesome lazy would lynch list of lazyness, GO! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
much mafiay | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 23:12 ShoCkeyy wrote: You call that spam, but people say "I don't like shockeyy's activity". Well that's why my activity sucks in every game I play. Then you call that spam? But fail to look at people like rsoul, who already have 7+ pages of filter and most of it is crap. To me that seems like they're trying to hide their mistakes with constant posting. Just read the fight between her and wbg. She completely ignores him until the lynch train happened. It just seems odd. i don't really remember anyone having that problem with you at all and in fact it was mainly that you wrote a giant list post with no real reads and then had no real accusations on anyone in particular | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 23:50 GlowingBear wrote: HF if you don't do things soon I will lead a crusade on you Mark my words i don't have to do anything lol On June 17 2015 07:03 Holyflare wrote: CONFIRMED TOWN BITCHES | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 18 2015 01:09 boxerfred wrote: EBWOP: "So I'd like the more experienced players in here if HF is a player that is capable of changing his meta and who cares - or not." - "So I'd like to ASK ..." whether i follow or am capable of changing my meta or not is irrelevant because that post is nothing about how i am playing and everything about how rsoul was playing and misrepresenting my play to make some bs scum read on me not sure how you can make that post and not realise that | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 18 2015 00:56 LightningStrike wrote: I back and KSC stilll thinks I scum and thinks I had slipped when I Town -_- and HF thinks I changing my scum meta when I not even scum -_- Plus GB you still didn't answer a question I had asked -_- I will quote the question here: @HF: You seriously need to help us if you are town can you play the game correctly now? <3 @Rsoultin and GB: Any thoughts on Shockeyy? um right well still no do something with meee then ls | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 18 2015 01:17 boxerfred wrote: I think that this is actually really relevant because if you're not the guy to change you're meta, you're most likely town. if I am to trust the meta read that someone (have to recall) made on you. Gonna look into rsoul too when I'm home. Just don't forget that all I did by now was skimming through the thread, reading Kelsier's and your filter. That's not too much, so my first conclusions won't be too great, eh? i try and change but always fall into the same spammy nature eventually either way your giant post says: i'm mafia because i am aware of my meta and pointed out someone lying about past games to "fake" a read on me i'm mafia because i posted that after i posted a small reply to a big post you should be coming to the opposite conclusion on the first line since i'm pointing out people doing scummy things - lying (but for some reason you ignore that and say it's scummy i know my meta?) and the second line isn't even true since it comes AFTER i made my vote and wasn't even in response to the big post since it was posted at the exact same time she posted the big one then you say i could be town if i stick to my meta lol!??! how does knowing my meta relate to your read on me at all? IF i did something the same way 3 games in a row and someone says i didn't do that and i'm scummy for not acting the same way then i can't really comprehend how you could even make your case to begin with it pretty much makes me think you just picked a filter and decided to scum read someone and then forgot about what actually happened in their filter altogether and it's pretty scummy | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 18 2015 01:17 LightningStrike wrote: Okay what your thoughts on shockeyy because I want to compare what I think of him now after my nap and you so we can work together! well i outlined something about him in my lazy reads thing, his posts make him seem new and he has basically 0 reads, his list post was crappy but his defiance + "i only have 1 read" later was quite towny but now we are just littered with excuses which is pretty scummy so it's basically mafia unless proven otherwise | ||
| ||
