Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 2

On June 17 2015 23:57 GlowingBear wrote:


: )))))

##Vote: Onegu

What about the Onegu rule you are so excited with, that got scum twice in the latest two games you played?

Ok for Clarity

Onegu Rule:

Onegu trolls all of day 1 and Night 1.

People get upset.

People scum read onegu.

People who have reasons other than "Onegu is trolling" are scum.

People who want to Plynch Onegu are ok.

On June 18 2015 04:10 Holyflare wrote:


you mean like the thing that i already mentioned as a reason for her being scum this game? ^^

On June 17 2015 12:07 rsoultin wrote:


you disappointed me

(more to the point, we got along fine when i was scum, so that's just bad, hf. i expect better from you)

On June 18 2015 04:27 Holyflare wrote:
jesus i can't even english any more

On June 18 2015 04:31 LightningStrike wrote:

You would rather lynch town than scum? Clearly you going for the most antitown move by lynching blue.

On June 18 2015 04:40 LightningStrike wrote:

You would rather lynch a blue. You idiot......................... DON'T LYNCH BLUES BRO OR YOU WILL LOSE.............

On June 18 2015 22:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
I see I have been ninjaed.

Re: LS, I didn't defend LS prior to the claim because I myself was unsure of his alignment at that point. To me he seemed townish but my reasons were not very well qualified and it was mostly on the basis of him not acting in a very similar way to how he did in the last game where he was scum and we got him killed day 1. Indeed here his defense is a lot more passioned whereas in the previous game and in all the other scum games I read in which he got lynched he more or less rolled over and died.

The claim however pretty much instantly erased any doubts I had and that's when I chose to defend him because I knee jubjubs and scum would jump all over that shit to call him scum. The two worst responses IMO were yours and GB, and to a lesser extent Onegu whose only listed reason for voting was policy. IMO people who do not view that claim as a townish thing to do are either mafia or bad, and I really prefer not to assume someone is bad town when they have demonstrated some capability of thinking analytically.

GB's reaction to the claim was really terrible. He flipped his read on LS completely which is not what I would expect town to do simply on the basis of a claim. It also appeared very opportunistic because as soon as I showed resistance he backed off, and curiously tried to get my opinion on another low-hanging-fruit of a player, VA.

What's interesting to me here is that the more that I think on kt and write it out the more I find GB scummy than anyone else. Anyone else down to kill him today?

On June 18 2015 23:41 wherebugsgo wrote:


is that cause you are scum or is that because you are worse than LS?

Pick one, cause either way you deserve to die more than he does

On June 18 2015 23:43 wherebugsgo wrote:
like, more or less admitting that you don't give a fuck what LS's alignment is, and then admitting that you are lynching him for pure policy is by itself far scummier than anything LS did. At least he is trying and giving off the impression that he cares about the game, and even if he is scum and you are town he's probably a bigger asset to us.