[M][N] I Still Can't Believe it's not Themed Mafia

On June 05 2015 14:36 Chezinu wrote:

side effects from champion game.. I've been wounded with sanity.

On June 05 2015 14:39 boxerfred wrote:
Hello, people

Sick case already, looking forward to the answers!

On June 05 2015 14:36 Chezinu wrote:

side effects from champion game.. I've been wounded with sanity.

On June 05 2015 15:03 justanothertownie wrote:

If the case on mig is "meh" then this is a at best a giant load of crap.

On June 05 2015 16:34 Mig wrote:
How is being the first person to actually ask something I find to be relevant blending in? Especially when people are retarded and say things like "mig planning his night kills" "it is useless asking whether someone is good at town". I would be more likely to say nothing when everyone is bullshitting instead of actually attempting to create discussion if I were mafia.

On June 05 2015 17:04 Mig wrote:


I don't really see how coming in and making nonsensical comments then disappearing is getting the game started.

On June 05 2015 19:03 justanothertownie wrote:

We both know you will totally talk to me. Its not like I will just keep calling you scum.

On June 06 2015 07:42 justanothertownie wrote:

Noone would ever make the connectionof lock = jail. Are you kidding me.

Yeah, yes. There are never ever both jk and doctor in a 13 player mini with scum having 1 KP. NEVER.

On June 06 2015 07:55 NaCl`y wrote:
@Everyone

I do not believe there would simply be 2 protective roles in this game. I would like the input of others that have not said anything towards this, it would be appreciated. Are there likely to be 2 town protective roles? Could Artanis[Xp] be the mafia roleblocker fake claiming since they are notified and it would be a good cover for somebody that notoriously does not play as mafia?

On June 06 2015 07:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Because he didn't know my alignment and it was already weird to him. For someone who does know alignments the options are much more limited.

On June 06 2015 08:00 yamato77 wrote:

Look, Artanis shouldn't have claimed when he did, but the crumb is quite obviously a crumb in hindsight

If you don't think it's a crumb now, I don't know what to tell you

On June 06 2015 08:03 yamato77 wrote:

it's not really about whether anyone perceived it to be a crumb or not in the first place

it's about it obviously being something that was out of place in the given context, which was then claimed to be a crumb. kinda makes sense, no?

Unless you believe mafia artanis is either:

1) fakeclaiming with an awful crumb

or

2) covering his ass by making up a claim out of some odd sentence he posted

On June 06 2015 08:43 justanothertownie wrote:
Ok, tell me:
1) Why would scum NaCl counterclaim if they can shoot town artanis in the night?
2) How on earth does Artanis play make sense from a town pov? Do you think he is usually a pretty stupid guy?

On June 06 2015 08:44 Fecalfeast wrote:
Actually this is all reminding me of the 2 jailkeeper setup from not-so-long ago.

Let's talk about other stuff or figure out a way to confirm them via night actions or something.

On June 06 2015 09:03 prplhz wrote:
has artanis never been mislynched?

On June 06 2015 09:12 Chezinu wrote:
##Unvote

##Vote FecalFeast

Artanis[Xp] save yourself vote fecalfeast!!!

On June 06 2015 10:57 justanothertownie wrote:

Yes, and scum might have a roleblocker so it would not confirm anything.

On June 06 2015 15:59 fuba wrote:
Sorry, I was really out of it today.

First, regarding the claims... I can't find a reason to really disbelieve NaCl's claim. Was at least leaning town on him before it (mostly because of the case that people seem to agree seems accurate, though I haven't had the time to look into mig's previous games myself). That being said, I can't really decide what to make of Artanis's claim. My instinct is to believe him, though that instinct has bitten me in the ass before. Like prplhz said, his story does have a consistency to it that leads me to believe he's telling the truth. The fact that prplhz's view suddenly seemed to flip on the subject makes me... uncomfortable.


I think I'd prefer to lynch this guy. Gives reasons to see yamato as scummy>says yamato could be scummy>backs off on it>prefers no-lynch over guy he thinks could be scum. I mean, I understand wishy-washiness better than anyone, but he definitely seems to just be coasting by. Like... if he'd really given enough thought to preferring a no-lynch over a yamato lynch, why didn't he then switch his vote? He seems to just be saying things to say things, giving the appearance of participation, and disappearing.

##Vote boxerfred

Gotta get some sleep, but I'll get up an hour or two early to read/talk.

On June 06 2015 17:05 Mig wrote:
prplhz if for some reason you didn't lynch artanis who would be your second option?

On June 06 2015 20:50 marvellosity wrote:
if it's gonna tell us mafia KP is 1, i think we can be told what that means in precise terms

On June 07 2015 00:32 justanothertownie wrote:

Let's say 95 % of the time.

On June 07 2015 01:01 justanothertownie wrote:
##Unvote
Yes, marv might be mafia. Gonna read you yamato bit now.

On June 07 2015 04:00 justanothertownie wrote:

Is this a serious question?

On June 07 2015 04:15 justanothertownie wrote:

So you missed that NaCl unclaimed? Am I supposed to believe this?

On June 06 2015 09:13 justanothertownie wrote:

Btw. concerning this: If there you are another blue - DO NOT CLAIM. We will lynch Artanis without the need for another claim.

On June 06 2015 10:56 justanothertownie wrote:
If NaCl ever rescinds his claim later he will be lynched though. If you counterclaimed as VT or something like this stop it immediately.

On June 07 2015 04:53 justanothertownie wrote:

No, it literally didn't.

On June 07 2015 04:54 justanothertownie wrote:

You should read and try to understand the whole post before you accuse me of something stupid.

On June 07 2015 04:55 justanothertownie wrote:

Nope. Incorrect conclusion.

On June 07 2015 04:56 justanothertownie wrote:

I said "if you unclaim LATER you will be lynched" and then I say "if you are doing this as VT stop it immediately". Are you really unable to read?

On June 07 2015 05:06 justanothertownie wrote:

You are being ridiculous and dumb and I will call what you are doing ridiculous and dumb if you keep it up.
Understanding what I did is not exactly rocket science.

I will some it up for you once again because you have such a hard time reading my posts:

I scumread Artanis for two things:
1) His unbelievable claim/my doubts that he would do it as town.
2) The cc.

Without the cc this is not enough to lynch him as potential JK. He could just have a terrible game.

I said if NaCl unclaims LATER as in AFTER WE LYNCH ARTANIS he will get lynched and that he should unclaim immediately if he is VT. He did unclaim immediately so there is no problem. It is not hard to understand why there is a difference between unclaiming now and later, right?

I said blues should not counterclaim because I was pretty certain that I could lynch Artanis without that.


Where exactly is your problem with any of that?

On June 07 2015 05:19 Mig wrote:
Prplhz and jta if either of you are town smh

Prplhz either vote for him or quit clogging up the thread fuck.

On June 07 2015 05:25 Mig wrote:
Prpl, it is 2 hours before lynch. I dont give a fuck if you are right or not, this isnt the time for it. Unless you wanted to push to lynch jta

On June 07 2015 05:25 Mig wrote:
Prpl, it is 2 hours before lynch. I dont give a fuck if you are right or not, this isnt the time for it. Unless you wanted to push to lynch jta

On June 07 2015 05:33 NaCl`y wrote:


Have you not read my big post that I made when I uncounterclaimed?

On June 07 2015 05:33 Fecalfeast wrote:

read mig's filter please tell me what you think

On June 08 2015 02:18 marvellosity wrote:

I think these people are town:

1.marvellosity
2.justanothertownie
3. NaCl`y
4.prplhz
7. Alakaslam
13. Artanis[Xp]

slam is kinda squeezy in betweeny, but i'd still be surprised if he were mafia.

so anyone not in that list basically

On June 08 2015 02:43 Fecalfeast wrote:

Do you have the opposite read?

On June 09 2015 17:55 marvellosity wrote:
you best do some stuff, you lazy shit

@ jat

On June 09 2015 19:44 justanothertownie wrote:

At least I am not openly insulting people so I have that going for me.

I also wasn't the only one interrogating boxerfred. And saying he is doing tons of shit - where on earth does that come from? Do you think his answers to me and marv made sense? If so - how?

On June 09 2015 19:45 marvellosity wrote:

this makes me sad because you are not reading what i am saying about boxerfred.

sigh

On June 09 2015 19:10 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: boxerfred

so bored of your martyring

just die

On June 09 2015 20:00 marvellosity wrote:

not really/quite

but if you can't read/understand it i can't really be bothered to explain at this stage

On June 10 2015 02:58 fuba wrote:

He clearly seems to be claiming cop.

On June 10 2015 03:24 fuba wrote:
Isn't there somewhere with a list of peoples' games and roles somewhere? I'm having trouble finding it =/

On June 10 2015 03:28 fuba wrote:

Where did he tell people not to lynch marv?

On June 10 2015 07:51 Chezinu wrote:

To unclaim, one must claim. You've been lying quite a lot this game.

On June 10 2015 07:52 NaCl`y wrote:
Ok, whatever, let's continue lynching Chezinu for being obnoxious.

On June 10 2015 07:53 marvellosity wrote:

because it's definitely the only reason he's given

On June 10 2015 07:56 marvellosity wrote:
because i'm pretty sure i look pretty townie

so no-one voting me has any reasons?

On June 12 2015 23:13 NaCl`y wrote:
I implore you to lybch Fuba since he was scummy all game and has not said a words for almost 48 hours.

On June 16 2015 08:41 Half the Sky wrote:


I was wrong on the 2nd blue role. It was tracker. Jat was tracker.

I was panicking about a DT....I'm an idiot. Thankfully I played well enough JAT would have never tracked me >_<

On June 16 2015 08:53 NaCl`y wrote:
Well played. You have certainly improved Half the Sky.

On June 16 2015 08:54 justanothertownie wrote:
You promised a reveal.

On June 16 2015 09:21 justanothertownie wrote:

lol
He did NOT keep active. He was #1 mislynch for days and basically did jackshit until right before deadline today. Yes, yes I can demand more than that.

On June 16 2015 10:00 justanothertownie wrote:

I generally do not tend to tunnel. And if you get mislynched - YOU are to blame. That's Palmar wisdom I completely agree with and I do not care if you disagree.

On June 16 2015 10:04 justanothertownie wrote:

No, I did not misunderstand that. The person who is mislynched is ALWAYS the one who is to blame the most. Sure, the voters are not free of guilt either but if you get mislynched day1 you are the worst player in the game.

On June 16 2015 10:02 justanothertownie wrote:

They can be townier if they know what not to do. Like martyring for example.

On June 16 2015 10:08 justanothertownie wrote:

Yes, I agree. And I never contested that in the slightest. Has nothing to do with what I said though. And now I am seriously gone.

On June 16 2015 10:10 justanothertownie wrote:

That has nothing to do with what I said at all. I am not saying I am not at fault for mislynching the guy.