| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:17 WaveofShadow wrote: I can get on board with this. yamato is my buddeh. ##vote: yamato77 There's no way you can actually think that is a good plan. What da fux. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:20 WaveofShadow wrote: I mean, best plan is to give me control of stuff cuz I want it, but I won't have time to campaign like an idiot so I'm just give my vote to somebody I like. Seems like a solid alternative to me. TL;DR WoS doesn't like me even though I gave him all those chocolate chip cookies in Catastrophe  | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:24 WaveofShadow wrote: Hmm, fair point. I do like you. Campaigning is annoying though. Aw Trolling the first few hours of a GreYMisT game is like the highlight of my year though! | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Find 3 people that are very likely town (which should be very easy) and have them lynch someone who is scum. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:41 LightningStrike wrote: Mainly about the Rogue because the problem with Rouge is that anyone can No Lynch I mean unless we get Confirmed Town in the 2nd Slot scum will go for a no lynch easily. We need confirmed town on the 2nd highest votes. Why would scum force the no-lynch? Lets say the warrior is going to lynch a townie. Then the rogue wouldn't want to no-lynch because that's another townie dead. Now lets say the warrior is going to lynch a scum. Then the rogue (probably) wouldn't want to no-lynch because then he gets lynched the enxt day. So basically he just trades his life for his teammate's life. Seems a bit pointless. And yes, we're lynching any rogue who forces no-lynch. No questions asked. They die. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote: So rsoultin is scum because of something different players did in other games? ^ this | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:26 LightningStrike wrote: No her entrance alone making her scum and the type of interaction between her and ExO reminds of what [UoN]Sent and Superbia did in Campus Day 1 which seems very Mafia on Mafia interaction. 1) ExO and rsoultin are not Sentinal and Superbia. Just because they interact the same doesn't say anything about their alignments. If you want to argue that their interaction is scummy, then by all means do, but saying "because they played like some other scum did in some other game" is useless. 2) But more importantly, ExO and rsoultin haven't even mentioned or talked to each other in the entire thread. Where the hell is that read coming from :o | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:33 LightningStrike wrote: How am I confusing her for ritoky when she was very happy opening wise in XXX. The point is ritoky was the one doing that whole "counter-campaign" thing with ExO, not rsoultin. If you don't even realize that that was ritoky and not rsoultin, then this whole conversation seems misguided? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:35 LightningStrike wrote: rsoultin opening was her giving her little thing about liking ExO's plan that where 2 came from. That wasn't ExO's plan, it was Snarf's. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:56 ExO_ wrote: idk in Guardians he did something similar with "meta" reads when he said something along the lines of "I think ExO is town based on the Student Game we played last". Granted, now he's reading scum where in Guardians he was reading me as town. Still doing that same silly kinda meta reading back to back as scum would be silly, so maybe I'm just over thinking it. If you look back at Guardians, even in this big meta list post that LS made, everyone was either town or null, and all the nulls were basically "they're doing X and might be mafia but I don't know". Feels pretty different than the attack on rsoultin here. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Sorryz. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 12:01 rsoultin wrote: fair enough, though i wouldn't call that flashy campaign thingy much of a plan  Pfft, it's the best plan. Elect me because I am town, I lynch scum, we move on to day 2  | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 12:05 rsoultin wrote: which scum are you planning on lynching? lol Half the people haven't even posted yet! | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 12:10 rsoultin wrote: i still think it's a good idea to make people commit to the scum they want to lynch but i'm not gonna keep pushing it if no one else is interested Don't give up on your dreams! Also, I thought that was just common sense? Obviously we shouldn't vote for people who aren't going to say who they want to lynch. And as far as everyone saying who they wan't to lynch, that part's not really any different from any other game. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 16:47 Holyflare wrote: Second quote is my carol opener. If anyone can even hint that they are the same that is a blatant misrepresentation. To be fair, it's a lot more like the Carol opener (town bravado hoorah!) than your last 5-6 town openers | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 08:02 Snarfs wrote: + Show Spoiler + Snarfs' Recommended General Strategy First, two general tips: 1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment. 2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p. Now, onto day 1 strategy: Adventuring Party I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why. Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. ...snip... + Show Spoiler + We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information. Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings. I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players. Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline. Discuss! | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On March 28 2015 17:47 rsoultin wrote: i was referring to crossfire in general, but explain? i haven't played with him It's been a while (and it's 4am so I'm way too lazy to actually go look up quotes), but my memory says that Crossfire is a very careful kind of poster. A lot of things he says don't really "feel" natural. Being coach-y, weird plans, etc. And he doesn't tend to post a lot I think. Granted, I don't think i've played with scum Crossfire, but nothing about his posts so far feel out of the ordinary. Basically I'm more than fine with waiting for him to post more. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
ReBellioN vs HonMonO
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
