|
On March 29 2015 23:35 rsoultin wrote:nuh uh i don't want to lynch you but that's as far as it extends onegu <3 you can make my list, though @damdy yeah the defense of hapa is a bit awkward. this post in particular reads strange: Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 10:36 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:31 kitaman27 wrote:On March 29 2015 10:27 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:On March 29 2015 10:12 Snarfs wrote:
And calling out hapa for being afk seemed premature rather than just waiting to see On March 29 2015 08:43 kitaman27 wrote:
This mafia games aren't exactly straight troll either though so I'm mostly wait and see with him. Aren't I doing exactly what you're calling me out for with this post? But that's not what you said originally... It sounded to me like you thought he was mafia 12 hours before that. Yeah I found it scummy at that point in comparison to how strong he starts other town games I've seen him and he hasn't exactly changed my mind yet. i'm not convinced he's town either. I'm just also wondering why you would justify lynching a town player. like, i think i get what he was trying to say in that he thought scumreading hapa as early as some did was premature, but it's still just a very strange post -_-
Why are you in my head...
But yea it is weird because of the defense and then realizing he shouldn't be then waffling. I think he's scum
|
LS bats just said you shouldn't be lynched, show me how it's not her Scum game exactly ls?
|
On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things.
No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts.
So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well
|
On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine.
No we need to discuss this.
Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning.
|
On March 30 2015 02:15 Chezitwo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 02:09 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 02:06 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. +1 sorry chez like the whole thrust of his read appeared to be you wouldn't go rogue (lolol pun intended) and do whatever the fuck you want...like saying someone is intelligent and not pursuing (what he perceives to be) mislynches is a kinda weak townread, at least from where i'm sitting The fact you don't like the read doesn't mean it doesn't exist; namely that I don't seem rash which fits his warrior profile, and the fact I try to look at both sides of the coin rather than pushing people into the dirt (Koshi at the time).
No one is saying it doesn't exist, its obvious it's there in its filter. Why you are hard defending the read IDK.
Nor why you are trying to explain how read when he's not giving anything just blanket statements doesn't make the read not what I've said
|
On March 30 2015 02:11 kitaman27 wrote:
damdred since it isn't completely clear, who are the couple of people you would suggest to be lynched by the elected mayor?
Right now would want Snarfs lynched for reasons stated before.
And hapa because pack of trying.
|
On March 30 2015 02:26 Chezitwo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 02:23 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 02:15 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 02:09 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 02:06 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:
[quote]
also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. +1 sorry chez like the whole thrust of his read appeared to be you wouldn't go rogue (lolol pun intended) and do whatever the fuck you want...like saying someone is intelligent and not pursuing (what he perceives to be) mislynches is a kinda weak townread, at least from where i'm sitting The fact you don't like the read doesn't mean it doesn't exist; namely that I don't seem rash which fits his warrior profile, and the fact I try to look at both sides of the coin rather than pushing people into the dirt (Koshi at the time). No one is saying it doesn't exist, its obvious it's there in its filter. Why you are hard defending the read IDK. Nor why you are trying to explain how read when he's not giving anything just blanket statements doesn't make the read not what I've said I'm not. I was very clear. You said: 1. There was little to no reasoning I said 1. There was reasoning This is also why I said I didn't want to discuss it anymore.
...so basically you are disagreeing with me just Tod o so even though in right?
|
On March 30 2015 02:27 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 02:25 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 02:11 kitaman27 wrote:
damdred since it isn't completely clear, who are the couple of people you would suggest to be lynched by the elected mayor? Right now would want Snarfs lynched for reasons stated before. And hapa because pack of trying. And how do you feel about the BH suggestion that is being thrown around?
I think hapa or snarf is stronger but I wouldn't cry over bh he has been really disappointing.
|
|
|
On March 30 2015 03:43 Holyflare wrote:
i think we should put rsoul as warrior btw
Qft
|
LS why not rs here I'm pretty sure she's town?
Rs who is your lynch?
|
On March 30 2015 06:19 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:17 Damdred wrote:
LS why not rs here I'm pretty sure she's town?
Rs who is your lynch? I trust JAT since I know he's a smart player and I do think both of them are town I just think JAT might be the better leader.
IDK I think you should vote rsoultin. Who would you lynch today
|
I'm ok with a Snarfs lynch at this juncture rsoultin.
I trust you, either snarls, bh probably Trfel isn't bad lynch.
One of those three. Preferably snarfs
|
On March 30 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
That being said. I have 0 problems with a snarf shot. But I need to know why the fuck we are lynching him because I haven't heard anybody say something really smart about a snarf lynch.
kita hapa hf JAT
What are your opinions on this snarf lynch?
I want them on paper. I want to read them.
It's just me but I'll answer you, earlier in his filter he chainsaw defends hapa a bit and then right after he wobbles about it. It's way to sure about hap alignment though when hap hadn't done anything at all to me.
That's why I think he's Scum overall
|
On March 30 2015 06:38 Koshi wrote:
From reading Snarf his filter. There is a 0% chance Hapa is mafia with Snarfs.
0 fucking %
ZERO
If shards flips mafia hap is confirmed town I think
|
Oh I thought we only had 10 minutes ok that makes me feel better a bit.
Ok so hapa what do you think between Trfel and snarfs
|
It's a bad ! weekend for me but I'm almost free. Pm me I suppose if you want sexy private time while I get home in a few hours
|
On March 30 2015 08:58 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 08:54 Damdred wrote:
It's a bad ! weekend for me but I'm almost free. Pm me I suppose if you want sexy private time while I get home in a few hours mehhh really tempting to say you're mafia for not being around but are in other game
Meh considering I've given 13 posts there and pages here- _-
|
Ok so I'm tired from work but going to be rereading the day a bit and writing notes for some bigger analysis. If anyone wants to talk about something specific just ask or pm me
|
Good evening, its been one hell of a day i'm sorry for my absence but I should be around pretty consitantly. I've already been having a fun time in PMs.
From PMs i'm really convinced that JAT, Kita are town. And I have a good feeling crossfire is town, he was pretty insightful and seemed to be struggling reading ritoky especially and had some good insight and thought progress I noticed in the pm we shared.
I was talking to Kita a bit about burying people in the thread and its one thing i'm interested in with snarfs at this point (which I hope a vig takes him out here). He claims hes caught up in the thread but he barely comments on anything going forward and he starts to try to stomp and bury me with one of his only read posts which really rubs me the wrong way.
HF shoul djust be left alone at this point, JAT and I have entered into an agreement which I won't reveal till daytime and he can back me up on this.
But i'm going to read a couple more filters and be around for eon
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
