|
On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Wow Soren is really digging old things :D
Cant we let past be past?
Digging up old things? Judging from your second sentence I can safely assume that you're implicitly implying that me digging old things is bad? Why is it bad?
Why let past be past?
First of, I wouldn't call them old things. Game started and I haven't posted till now, therefore I shall offer my thoughts as I play the catch up game.
And secondly, let past be past means you're just going to ignore everything that everyone has already said. In that case, how will you evaulaute someone's actions and words and determine if they are scum or not?
|
On April 10 2015 08:14 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:10 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 08:00 Tubesock wrote:On April 10 2015 07:54 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Wow Soren is really digging old things :D
Cant we let past be past? you should really just answer him and answer breshke why you are voting me Soren is looking good. Dwarf, uh not so much. Dwarf, you going to scumhunt at all? Prplhz, how do you read Half The Sky? She seems different this game from what I've seen of her in the past. Seems towny to me, but to be fair, I've only seen her in 1 scum game and I thought she was strong town then? uh, townie enough for now. don't know why you're asking me about some flaky meta read you're not sure about, if you have 1 game with her then i'd advice you to mostly disregard that and just focus on what she's doing this game. That's why I was asking you. You have more experience with her. Next time, I'll just ask you your read on her. That way I can get a read on you and more insight on her.
i do? i have one game with hts and i was scum that game (so i wasn't trying that hard to read her)
|
On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:02 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:59 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote:
Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. Ok so pressure votes are fine, but I really don't understand the point why he needs to clairify with out being asked why... It's like he feels guilty about why he voted and needed to clairfy to the thread for no reason. so me asking him to clarify doesn't count as a reasonn to clarify? On April 10 2015 07:24 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:05 plotspot wrote:
I never played mafia. I think on a forum I visited 10 years ago they started playing it. Never understood what the fuss was about. A few month ago the seeds from this time must have grown, when I was bored and read mafia on this forum, I kinda remember I have seen it somewhere before definitely. A game played 10 years ago and now still must have some sort of value right?^^ alright so after reading some mafia on this forum and checking out the general guide, you decided it was a good idea to vote alphabetically? My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question.
Maybe I anticipated that if I vote without any reason, people would come ask me anyway? Well prplhz still came with his own different question. If I didn't provide anything, in the next post I would have to answer, yeah lolz why did you?^^
|
On April 10 2015 07:56 Onegu wrote:
So I was planning on trying hard but then I rolled town so no I'll try one semi hard.
In before that's what she said...
Also moment Found something interesting.
I don't like this at all.
Claiming town does nothing at all. You can't just expect us to take you're word for it can you?
Scum read.
And what's this interesting thing you found?
|
On April 10 2015 08:14 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 08:02 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:59 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote:
Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. Ok so pressure votes are fine, but I really don't understand the point why he needs to clairify with out being asked why... It's like he feels guilty about why he voted and needed to clairfy to the thread for no reason. so me asking him to clarify doesn't count as a reasonn to clarify? On April 10 2015 07:24 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:05 plotspot wrote:
I never played mafia. I think on a forum I visited 10 years ago they started playing it. Never understood what the fuss was about. A few month ago the seeds from this time must have grown, when I was bored and read mafia on this forum, I kinda remember I have seen it somewhere before definitely. A game played 10 years ago and now still must have some sort of value right?^^ alright so after reading some mafia on this forum and checking out the general guide, you decided it was a good idea to vote alphabetically? My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question. seriously the timestamps are right in the post i just made can you verify with the timestamps that i asked him to clarify before he clarified or can we not count on you to put any effort into this game at all?
Ok ignore me...
##UNVOTE
|
On April 10 2015 08:01 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 07:58 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:43 plotspot wrote:
Ok, now that the roles are out for everyone. How are we going to drag the opponents out of the shadows? Haven't read any suspicious things or anything that gives away anything. Poking with words in the shadows will really help? Town read as this newbie is trying to learn how to scum hunt. Really I almost read it like he wants to hide from activity... Why post this here In the thread?
How is he hiding from activity?
He wants to learn how to scum hunt.
|
so soren333 where did you play mafia before?
|
On April 10 2015 08:15 Soren333 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Wow Soren is really digging old things :D
Cant we let past be past? Digging up old things? Judging from your second sentence I can safely assume that you're implicitly implying that me digging old things is bad? Why is it bad? Why let past be past? First of, I wouldn't call them old things. Game started and I haven't posted till now, therefore I shall offer my thoughts as I play the catch up game. And secondly, let past be past means you're just going to ignore everything that everyone has already said. In that case, how will you evaulaute someone's actions and words and determine if they are scum or not?
Oh, maybe I have played too much arcade mafia. I have used to people bringing "evidence to table" and then game really starts. But well, looks like I have to start reading posts more carefully :D
|
On April 10 2015 08:17 Soren333 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 07:56 Onegu wrote:
So I was planning on trying hard but then I rolled town so no I'll try one semi hard.
In before that's what she said...
Also moment Found something interesting. I don't like this at all. Claiming town does nothing at all. You can't just expect us to take you're word for it can you? Scum read. And what's this interesting thing you found?
It's my meta if I claimed VT that's when you should look out for me.
|
On April 10 2015 08:19 prplhz wrote:
so soren333 where did you play mafia before?
Why does this matter? Why am you asking every newbie This?
|
On April 10 2015 08:09 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:04 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:On April 10 2015 08:00 Tubesock wrote:On April 10 2015 07:54 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Wow Soren is really digging old things :D
Cant we let past be past? you should really just answer him and answer breshke why you are voting me Soren is looking good. Dwarf, uh not so much. Dwarf, you going to scumhunt at all? Prplhz, how do you read Half The Sky? She seems different this game from what I've seen of her in the past. Seems towny to me, but to be fair, I've only seen her in 1 scum game and I thought she was strong town then? Not much with what to scumhunt  It's like you're making an excuse already not to. You haven't questioned anyone. I think you just don't care and already have the game figured out. Do you have any town reads, anything?
Yup. Strong scum read on dwarf right now.
##Vote TheBloodyDwarf
|
On April 10 2015 08:16 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:14 Tubesock wrote:On April 10 2015 08:10 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 08:00 Tubesock wrote:On April 10 2015 07:54 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Wow Soren is really digging old things :D
Cant we let past be past? you should really just answer him and answer breshke why you are voting me Soren is looking good. Dwarf, uh not so much. Dwarf, you going to scumhunt at all? Prplhz, how do you read Half The Sky? She seems different this game from what I've seen of her in the past. Seems towny to me, but to be fair, I've only seen her in 1 scum game and I thought she was strong town then? uh, townie enough for now. don't know why you're asking me about some flaky meta read you're not sure about, if you have 1 game with her then i'd advice you to mostly disregard that and just focus on what she's doing this game. That's why I was asking you. You have more experience with her. Next time, I'll just ask you your read on her. That way I can get a read on you and more insight on her. i do? i have one game with hts and i was scum that game (so i wasn't trying that hard to read her)
oh haha I'm dumb. I assumed since you're a vet that you have played more games with her. My bad.
Anyway, I think she's acting towny. She's obviously learned not to enter in the game with huge "I'm TOWN" statements which gets her a lot of mud thrown her way. She seemed like she was digging a little into people which I think makes her towny.
|
On April 10 2015 08:11 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 07:46 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote:
i might or might not be scum
any thoughts? You're kidding me. That's scummy as hell. What kind of person says "oh hey guys huehuehue I might or might not be scum derp". Vote: prplhz Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 07:50 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:19 Bourneq wrote:On April 10 2015 06:16 Half the Sky wrote:On April 10 2015 06:14 Half the Sky wrote:
That said, what do you think of prplhz's comment? EBWOP at Bourneq - specifically this: On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote:
i might or might not be scum
any thoughts? Sorry again the phone.. It does not help me gain any information of any kind so I am not bothered. You need to question the motivation behind his question. What do you think is prplzl's motivation behind asking that question? I'm intrested that you find this scummy yet go on to tell someone to think about motivation. Could you explain to me what motivation scum would have to post this? He seemes to just be drawing attention to himself which i do not think is scummy. Also @Thebloodydwarf I asked about your vote because random voting is w/e but im under the understanding that it is done to apply pressure. Yet you voted someone who was around and posting and actively trying to produce content with people. This leads me to think that you simply voted to just fit in with other people doing it.
It's scummy because the question is pointless and he asked it just to appear as though he's trying to do something in the game.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On April 10 2015 08:06 Onegu wrote:
Hosts male the voting thread please, if make the links to it work
There is no voting thread
|
On April 10 2015 08:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:06 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 07:51 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:On April 10 2015 07:48 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:17 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote:
i might or might not be scum
any thoughts? Everybody has little scum inside them. What the bloody hell does this mean? Come visit me and I'll show you Are you really hinting your role to me. Wow this guy is hardcore. He is like failed psychiatrist. Never got his papers out of the university. I think you.are trying too hard :D
Already using bad logic against me.
Calling me a failed psychiatrist so as to discredit the validity of my posts.
|
On April 10 2015 08:16 plotspot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 08:02 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:59 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote:
Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. Ok so pressure votes are fine, but I really don't understand the point why he needs to clairify with out being asked why... It's like he feels guilty about why he voted and needed to clairfy to the thread for no reason. so me asking him to clarify doesn't count as a reasonn to clarify? On April 10 2015 07:24 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:05 plotspot wrote:
I never played mafia. I think on a forum I visited 10 years ago they started playing it. Never understood what the fuss was about. A few month ago the seeds from this time must have grown, when I was bored and read mafia on this forum, I kinda remember I have seen it somewhere before definitely. A game played 10 years ago and now still must have some sort of value right?^^ alright so after reading some mafia on this forum and checking out the general guide, you decided it was a good idea to vote alphabetically? My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question. Maybe I anticipated that if I vote without any reason, people would come ask me anyway? Well prplhz still came with his own different question. If I didn't provide anything, in the next post I would have to answer, yeah lolz why did you?^^
Why did I what?
|
On April 10 2015 08:22 Soren333 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:11 Breshke wrote:On April 10 2015 07:46 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote:
i might or might not be scum
any thoughts? You're kidding me. That's scummy as hell. What kind of person says "oh hey guys huehuehue I might or might not be scum derp". Vote: prplhz On April 10 2015 07:50 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 06:19 Bourneq wrote:On April 10 2015 06:16 Half the Sky wrote:On April 10 2015 06:14 Half the Sky wrote:
That said, what do you think of prplhz's comment? EBWOP at Bourneq - specifically this: On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote:
i might or might not be scum
any thoughts? Sorry again the phone.. It does not help me gain any information of any kind so I am not bothered. You need to question the motivation behind his question. What do you think is prplzl's motivation behind asking that question? I'm intrested that you find this scummy yet go on to tell someone to think about motivation. Could you explain to me what motivation scum would have to post this? He seemes to just be drawing attention to himself which i do not think is scummy. Also @Thebloodydwarf I asked about your vote because random voting is w/e but im under the understanding that it is done to apply pressure. Yet you voted someone who was around and posting and actively trying to produce content with people. This leads me to think that you simply voted to just fit in with other people doing it. It's scummy because the question is pointless and he asked it just to appear as though he's trying to do something in the game.
Do you not think he actually achieved doing something? He seemed to be trying to drive conversation forward. Yes the question in itself doesn't actually scumhunt but making conversation does so i don't see it as pointless.
I like your vote on dwarf thought and think it is weird that he picked prplhz to random vote out of everyone and would still like to hear any reasoning he has for that.
|
On April 10 2015 08:24 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:16 plotspot wrote:On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 08:02 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:59 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote:
Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. Ok so pressure votes are fine, but I really don't understand the point why he needs to clairify with out being asked why... It's like he feels guilty about why he voted and needed to clairfy to the thread for no reason. so me asking him to clarify doesn't count as a reasonn to clarify? On April 10 2015 07:24 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:05 plotspot wrote:
I never played mafia. I think on a forum I visited 10 years ago they started playing it. Never understood what the fuss was about. A few month ago the seeds from this time must have grown, when I was bored and read mafia on this forum, I kinda remember I have seen it somewhere before definitely. A game played 10 years ago and now still must have some sort of value right?^^ alright so after reading some mafia on this forum and checking out the general guide, you decided it was a good idea to vote alphabetically? My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question. Maybe I anticipated that if I vote without any reason, people would come ask me anyway? Well prplhz still came with his own different question. If I didn't provide anything, in the next post I would have to answer, yeah lolz why did you?^^ Why did I what?
he would have to answer the question "why did you? [vote for prplhz]"
|
On April 10 2015 08:24 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:16 plotspot wrote:On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 08:02 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:59 Onegu wrote:On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote:
Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. Ok so pressure votes are fine, but I really don't understand the point why he needs to clairify with out being asked why... It's like he feels guilty about why he voted and needed to clairfy to the thread for no reason. so me asking him to clarify doesn't count as a reasonn to clarify? On April 10 2015 07:24 prplhz wrote:On April 10 2015 07:05 plotspot wrote:
I never played mafia. I think on a forum I visited 10 years ago they started playing it. Never understood what the fuss was about. A few month ago the seeds from this time must have grown, when I was bored and read mafia on this forum, I kinda remember I have seen it somewhere before definitely. A game played 10 years ago and now still must have some sort of value right?^^ alright so after reading some mafia on this forum and checking out the general guide, you decided it was a good idea to vote alphabetically? My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question. Maybe I anticipated that if I vote without any reason, people would come ask me anyway? Well prplhz still came with his own different question. If I didn't provide anything, in the next post I would have to answer, yeah lolz why did you?^^ Why did I what?
Just forget it. You figured out prplhz's logic, that's enough.
|
On April 10 2015 08:13 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2015 08:04 Soren333 wrote:On April 10 2015 07:13 Breshke wrote:Sup guys This is awkward timing but i'm not sure if him lurking is alignment indicative yet. On April 10 2015 07:06 Ace1312 wrote:
Yay, game start. I'm excited to read up When I get home from work. Is there a reason behind this? On April 10 2015 07:07 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
##VOTE prplhz How is that lurking? He seemed to suddenly appear right after someone placed a vote on him. Even if it isnt a coincidence I don't think its scummy depending on weather he is someone to be intimidated and not know how to enter the thread before that point.
The reason why I think it's not lurking is because he didn't respond to the vote. If he did respond to the vote it would mean that he was reading the thread but hasn't made any post. Thus he would be lurking.
On the contrary, his opening post is acknowledging that the game started, suggesting that he just checked teamliquid to see if the game started and it did, then commented that he will be posting once he gets home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
