On February 28 2015 10:17 KelsierSC wrote:Va what do you think about rsol?
Mini Mafia Down Under - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:20 KelsierSC wrote: I dunno man..i think rayns pretty clearly town though Straight up from the thread, that's what I'm getting as well. I don't know how competent his mafia is, however. And he seemed very eager to interact with Palmar in the game we played, an eagerness which has been absent this game. No idea what it actually means, though. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:22 prplhz wrote: 26 @Superbia Can you give reads on me and KelsierSC? Honestly I've barely analyzed your interactions. KSC pinged you out for essentially putting words in oats' mouth, iirc. I have KSC as town, not sure where you are at atm. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
Yeah but he wasn't there last game as well. But rayn still pinged him out and itneracted with him. Here it's like rayn doesn't actually give a shit here. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:28 KelsierSC wrote: I'm not sure about trefo, I didn't like his entry, I really liked what rayn had to say about it as well. But its hard to see scum doing that, interrupting trolling to make that big post. Nah, I disagree with that. He seems very aware of his own meta and filters. Trolling and lurking is not in his town playbook. Which is why I'm not entirely sure on RSO atm. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:32 KelsierSC wrote: Well I mean palmar was mafia and rayn didn't have a good time so id understand if he tried a different idea. I think this thread and your instincts is enough Meh, I'll find some other games with them tomorrow and see if I can find a trend. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:39 prplhz wrote: 28 Uh maybe you can explain this 5m-meta-god-read-meta to the uninitated? Trfel's town and mafia filter feel different. This game feels like his town filter. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:43 rsoultin wrote: Let's recap, shall we? @1920... Trfel votes an Rsoul My last post before this vote (1759): @2143... Trfel unvotes an Rsoul My last post before this unvote (2133): Still no post from Trfel in the thread. A half hour passes, and I go huh. Let's try something. @2222... Rsoul votes a Trfel @2233... Oats votes a Trfel (I commented on this vote, prplhz, which is probably where you got your impression from) Low and behold, a magically appearing Trfel posts @23:05 + Show Spoiler + On February 27 2015 14:05 Trfel wrote: Hi. I'm going to head to sleep now, but I figured I would share some thoughts first. First, this is obviously a post restricted game, and I intend to do my best to use my posts effectively. At times, this can mean communicating my thoughts through the voting thread (see my vote and later unvote on rsoultin). I feel that my reasons for both of these actions were obvious, though I do intend to explain. My real question is, where does the nonsense end and the game start? I feel like there has been a lot more opening nonsense this game than in most, and this game is the one with post restrictions. Here's the reasons for my suspicions of rsoultin. I can understand wasting posts at the start of the game, but the post wasting continued for quite some time. Rsoultin's posts felt like they came later, more of as an afterthought, while it was after the point that nonsense posts had any value in at least starting the conversation. By the time rsoultin first posted, we had Robik wasting five posts, VayneAuthority voting for Oatsmaster, two vanilla town claims, and a cop claim. Plenty of random things to start the game, no more is needed. And then comes this wonderful post.Rsoultin isn't saying anything at all here, and she isn't making a joke or an interesting comment. "Rolling around the thread" and discussing happiness feels a bit out of place, though I'm bad at tone reads. My point is that I expect rsoultin to be sensible enough to conserve posts to some degree, and I don't see that here. Thus, my vote communicated the simple message of "step it up and play the game". Rsoultin shared a small number of game-related thoughts, and I removed my vote for now. I know that many people have made useless posts, I just think rsoultin looks more suspicious for it because she is sensible enough not to and she started doing so well after everyone else did. I am very interested to see where rsoultin goes from here. Thoughts? A riddle for you, KSC...now what could possibly be the scum motivation for that sequence? xP @Superbia...why don't you read, lovely? "Overly defensive"? lol...I had five points, one of which was a half-defense/half-snark and the other four reasons that I thought the progression and Trfel's post were scummy. Also, since this comes up every game...I work. I will be gone for big chunks of the day because of it. Deal with it. Your reply felt very dismissive, not aggressive at all. Like, you have played with the dude, right? Your arguments boil down to a number of expections of what you expect from town (iirc). Are these something you would expect from trefl? | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:57 rsoultin wrote: And? Is there some reason that my reply should feel "aggressive" over "dismissive" that I should know about? I started a wagon on him and encouraged others to vote him. Trfel is not playing how I would expect him to, no. Look at Student Mafia V. Look at Newbie Mini Mafia whatever number...the most recent. It is normal for me to get a read on his alignment early...and accurately xP My only reservation really is I know that he is trying some new things after last game, but the longer he is unproductive after bitching at us (specifically me) for being unproductive, the more the possibility of his being awkward town drops. Eh, whatever. I want to see what trfel comes up with and evaluate from there. I do not really recall your arguments being strong in your response post, which was dismissive and therefore, defensive. You only really picked up the pace later, which you would've had to do as mafia, since you called the guy scummy. Your aimed arguments just now look 5000% better than the rest of your case, though I will look at the filter of that game when I'm in a less delirious mood. (i..e tomorrow) | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
![]() | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On March 01 2015 04:30 Palmar wrote: My case ![]() Fuck your case and fuck you Palmar, pretty spot on with me trying to get two town lynched in trefl/rso. ![]() | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On March 01 2015 04:33 Palmar wrote: Don't hate the playa hate the game I'm going to lynch you this game, regardless of your alignment. ;p | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
| ||