|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:54 VayneAuthority wrote:
scum team is onegu, palmar, superbia prove me wrong some one, im bored.
Why palmar specifically?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:56 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:54 VayneAuthority wrote:
scum team is onegu, palmar, superbia prove me wrong some one, im bored. Palmar is probably not mafia but neither are you so thank you.  you dont think he would be trolling right after that shitty sentinel game we played? I think he got mafia again lol.
In that game palmar felt more a force in the thread d1.
Imperial palmar just lurked basically and didn't really do anything d1.
Id say he lurks/trolls more as town based
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum.
Hmm I guess that makes sense.
Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted.
...bolded
How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread...
That was my whole point
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?
Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
So prpl just to clarify you didn't know the reasons why oats/rayn was voting trfel but you assumed they were good ones?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel.
Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy
Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read.
But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting".
Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Alright then prplhz what do you think of oats right now? And Robik
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:17 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven" Guy #2: "I can understand that" Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?" This is literally the conversation I think we're having.
No because oats didn't say anything. You said you got where he was.coming from. Then you said you assumed he had a hard to follow opinion. So how can you get it? Less dodging
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:48 prplhz wrote:19 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:36 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:17 On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven" Guy #2: "I can understand that" Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?" This is literally the conversation I think we're having. No because oats didn't say anything. You said you got where he was.coming from. Then you said you assumed he had a hard to follow opinion. So how can you get it? Less dodging I never said "I get it". Take the part where I said "I get where [they] are coming from". Replace it with "I understand why they would think he is scum" (as in, "I think he is scummy so I understand why someone else would think he is scummy too"). If you don't accept that what I meant by the first line can be expressed by the second line then vote me or whatever. If you accept it, then start talking to me about the second line. I'm really not dodging, I just spent like 15 posts explaining this to you. Quite literally, most of my filter is talking to you about it so I'm not dodging. If you want to see me dodge then let me know.
I'm already voting you.
I've made my conclusions on this known. It seemed like you were making up reasons to get onboard and now you're backtracking. Also how can you get where oats is coming from, but then say he has a hard to follow reason, which he never gives. I think you're caught. But I'll let others give their views or whatever.
Id like your read on other people
Oats and robik specifically
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:59 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:53 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:48 prplhz wrote:19 On February 28 2015 09:36 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:17 On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven" Guy #2: "I can understand that" Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?" This is literally the conversation I think we're having. No because oats didn't say anything. You said you got where he was.coming from. Then you said you assumed he had a hard to follow opinion. So how can you get it? Less dodging I never said "I get it". Take the part where I said "I get where [they] are coming from". Replace it with "I understand why they would think he is scum" (as in, "I think he is scummy so I understand why someone else would think he is scummy too"). If you don't accept that what I meant by the first line can be expressed by the second line then vote me or whatever. If you accept it, then start talking to me about the second line. I'm really not dodging, I just spent like 15 posts explaining this to you. Quite literally, most of my filter is talking to you about it so I'm not dodging. If you want to see me dodge then let me know. I'm already voting you. I've made my conclusions on this known. It seemed like you were making up reasons to get onboard and now you're backtracking. Also how can you get where oats is coming from, but then say he has a hard to follow reason, which he never gives. I think you're caught. But I'll let others give their views or whatever. Id like your read on other people Oats and robik specifically Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:18 prplhz wrote:10 On February 28 2015 09:14 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum? Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel. Do you seriously think scum just intentionally straight up invent reads? What would I even gain from inventing an Oatsmaster read on Trfel in that situation? If I was scum just looking to get on board, why would I feel the need to invent an Oatsmaster read? Don't you think I would have thought it sufficient to just mention you, rsoultin, and raynpelikoneet? There is literally no reason to invent an Oatsmaster read for me in that situation. With all due respect to Oatsmaster he's not exactly someone you name drop to get things done on this forum. It's completely ridiculous to claim that I would straight up intentionally invent an Oatsmaster read so I could "get onboard" when there were other, better people to sheep if that's what I wanted to do. ##Vote KelsierSC
I'm not saying it was intentional. I think you had to make up a read and made a mistake
Voting me is some pathetic faje display of indignation.
Why ate you reluctant to give the reads I asked for
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:04 prplhz wrote:24 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 10:02 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:59 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 09:53 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:48 prplhz wrote:19 On February 28 2015 09:36 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:17 On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
[quote]
????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven" Guy #2: "I can understand that" Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?" This is literally the conversation I think we're having. No because oats didn't say anything. You said you got where he was.coming from. Then you said you assumed he had a hard to follow opinion. So how can you get it? Less dodging I never said "I get it". Take the part where I said "I get where [they] are coming from". Replace it with "I understand why they would think he is scum" (as in, "I think he is scummy so I understand why someone else would think he is scummy too"). If you don't accept that what I meant by the first line can be expressed by the second line then vote me or whatever. If you accept it, then start talking to me about the second line. I'm really not dodging, I just spent like 15 posts explaining this to you. Quite literally, most of my filter is talking to you about it so I'm not dodging. If you want to see me dodge then let me know. I'm already voting you. I've made my conclusions on this known. It seemed like you were making up reasons to get onboard and now you're backtracking. Also how can you get where oats is coming from, but then say he has a hard to follow reason, which he never gives. I think you're caught. But I'll let others give their views or whatever. Id like your read on other people Oats and robik specifically On February 28 2015 09:18 prplhz wrote:10 On February 28 2015 09:14 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:
[quote]
6
There's really not much to it.
"I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from"
What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum? Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel. Do you seriously think scum just intentionally straight up invent reads? What would I even gain from inventing an Oatsmaster read on Trfel in that situation? If I was scum just looking to get on board, why would I feel the need to invent an Oatsmaster read? Don't you think I would have thought it sufficient to just mention you, rsoultin, and raynpelikoneet? There is literally no reason to invent an Oatsmaster read for me in that situation. With all due respect to Oatsmaster he's not exactly someone you name drop to get things done on this forum. It's completely ridiculous to claim that I would straight up intentionally invent an Oatsmaster read so I could "get onboard" when there were other, better people to sheep if that's what I wanted to do. ##Vote KelsierSC I'm not saying it was intentional. I think you had to make up a read and made a mistake Voting me is some pathetic faje display of indignation. Why ate you reluctant to give the reads I asked for What mistake did I make?
Ive made this clear already.
Give the reads I asked for so we can move on
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:14 Superbia wrote:
1 between trfel and rso. Trfel's filter this game feels different from his mafia game filter, but only slightly. So meh. I can't even recount RSO's posts. So prob RSO.
Id also say that I doubt mafia trefl would interrupt trolling to make a post about rsol that gets the thread going but doesn't say anything.
But neither of them have done anything.
Va what do you think about rsol?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:14 Superbia wrote:
Can someone link me to some of rayn's games? Especially ones where Palmar's playing as well.
....weren't you just in one?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:18 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 10:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:14 Superbia wrote:
Can someone link me to some of rayn's games? Especially ones where Palmar's playing as well. ....weren't you just in one? Yes. I need more. 
I dunno man..i think rayns pretty clearly town though
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:23 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 10:20 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:18 Superbia wrote:On February 28 2015 10:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:14 Superbia wrote:
Can someone link me to some of rayn's games? Especially ones where Palmar's playing as well. ....weren't you just in one? Yes. I need more. I dunno man..i think rayns pretty clearly town though Straight up from the thread, that's what I'm getting as well. I don't know how competent his mafia is, however. And he seemed very eager to interact with Palmar in the game we played, an eagerness which has been absent this game. No idea what it actually means, though.
Palmar isn't here is what it means.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
I'm not sure about trefo, I didn't like his entry, I really liked what rayn had to say about it as well. But its hard to see scum doing that, interrupting trolling to make that big post.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:26 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 10:23 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:23 Superbia wrote:On February 28 2015 10:20 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:18 Superbia wrote:On February 28 2015 10:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 10:14 Superbia wrote:
Can someone link me to some of rayn's games? Especially ones where Palmar's playing as well. ....weren't you just in one? Yes. I need more. I dunno man..i think rayns pretty clearly town though Straight up from the thread, that's what I'm getting as well. I don't know how competent his mafia is, however. And he seemed very eager to interact with Palmar in the game we played, an eagerness which has been absent this game. No idea what it actually means, though. Palmar isn't here is what it means. Yeah but he wasn't there last game as well. But rayn still pinged him out and itneracted with him. Here it's like rayn doesn't actually give a shit here.
Well I mean palmar was mafia and rayn didn't have a good time so id understand if he tried a different idea.
I think this thread and your instincts is enough
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 10:32 prplhz wrote:
27
@KelsierSC I'll answer you question if you answer mine. This ignoring me thing is boring and useless and you don't know that I am scum for shit and since we're both here we might as well talk.
You just said I wasn't intentionally making up Oatsmaster's read so apparently the mistake I made was to think that Oatsmaster had scum read Trfel when he hadn't (although he had)? If this is the reason you're voting me you need to explain to me, why are scum more likely to make this mistake than town?
Alright broken down.
1. Your jump on trefl felt opportunistic and the reason was poor.
2. When questioned you said specifically that you "got where rayn,oats and I where coming from" to me this implies you liked the cases we made. I had a one liner,oats hadn't said anything.
3. You then said later that you didn't know oats reason and assumed it was hard to follow...if its hard to follow you can't get him. Especially when he hasn't given the reason.
Scum reads are fake, they have to lie , they can make mistakes.especially under scrutiny
4. You dodged rayn on some pretty obvious technicalities
5. You voted me out if fake bullshit indignation.
Ok you can give reads on robik and oats now
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
