EPTEden started playing and actually acting towny and his yelling at me sounded really to come from a genuine towny place, not many people following me, but eden really went head on at it which isn't really his scum game I think. really makes me not want to lynch him today.
Newbie Student Mafia VI - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Eden started playing and actually acting towny and his yelling at me sounded really to come from a genuine towny place, not many people following me, but eden really went head on at it which isn't really his scum game I think. really makes me not want to lynch him today. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On February 25 2015 23:11 Damdred wrote: would like a deeper explanation of this since you missed it. Also only got ticketed once and always quit posting now when i'm on the road i'll keep posting this till you answer probably | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
SL/Wave Sna lynch | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Instead of going with the flow with the snarls case he also struck back fairly interestingly going against the grain, his intial post was meh, but his follow up explanation was pretty good to me, it make a lot of sense and you could see what he was saying. I don't want to lynch him | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Yeah the case itself isn't bad, its made up of some weak points at this point in the thread though. Cases can grow or get weaker, and I think tis got weaker with torms continued play. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On February 26 2015 01:35 Tronak wrote: that doesnt make sense... Explain to me please, what does being anti town/mafia mean? does it mean my game is so bad that I could only cause confusion to both factions? so I should be a cheap lynch for the town in early days? and mafia will easy shoot me tomorrow? (why could both be "anti" at the same time?). Just means he thinks you are scum or you are town who is scum siding | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On February 26 2015 01:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Okay, that's fair even though I disagree with your assessment on the original case (I think it's damning) I don't think it's fruitful to keep arguing about that. I'm not willing to lynch Wave though. Why are you willing to lynch Wave and why aren't you willing to lynch Yamato? What has Yamato actually posted that you liked? When I think of wave and his town play I generally think of someone doing a ton of things with a decent thread precense finds things pushes them. I see part of this in wave, the finding something and pushing it for the first half of the day but past that hes been kind of....void he dropped what he found to be scummy and has just been here. I played with a mafia yamato before and he just doesn't seem to care and as town he cares and has some thoughts. I see more the later here, the initial case he posted wasn't as good as you but he did try to jump start the thread in a direction he thought was good which is towny I think. His paranoia while super high for whatever reason (which towards you art is kinda believable) is ok. I just don't want to lynch him I think right now I think. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On February 26 2015 01:58 Snarfs wrote: Artanis, what's your read on me? can you explain your read progression on Node better. Hours before you called him mafia you called him town and everything you called him mafia for existed when you called him town and you supposedly read his filter the first time as well. So what changed? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
To probably would pick tormented because of X, to then voting kel? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
If you are sure that node is mafia you should push it. If you are sure that the case tormented put up was forced, you should push it you said you would rather vote tormented. Then you vote ksc because hts was wishy washy? I don't see what you are trying ##vote snarf | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On February 26 2015 03:24 WaveofShadow wrote: Well damdred that was my initial problem with you, remember? Nonstop confidence that has was scum and then you just stopped pushing it. Why is what snares did in the regard different? I stopped pushing it for two seconds waiting on hts to do stuff then kel replaced in theris a bit of a difference I think. I didn't write a case exactly, and after I said I would back off I still wrote why I think they are scum and pressured kel and eden. Here we have, someone go I think this person is mafia! A few hours later they give a meta post explaining why they were wrong and they are now town. However you have pro I think it was say this wasn't the snarf he remembers and he would of went for the throat. Directly after this he comes up with a hard scum read on node when everything he scum read that person for had already happened in the thread before he made the town read. He then under light pressure and no push to get people to consier node as mafia says hes been gone to long drops it. Says artanis is scummy, drops it after nobody agrees, moves on to say he would lynch tormented. Then votes kel a few seconds later for hts being wishy washy. Its a totally different thing | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Gotta think about it but i'm bak on the road now then eating. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
##Vote Sl Snar left a legacy post it looks extremely towny to me. I'm really torn on him now kel makes good points on sl | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
I would rather not lynch snar today. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/B6ScFo8.jpg)
