EPTOn February 15 2015 18:50 Palmar wrote:
hi mom?
hi mom?
hi
Office Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
hi | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 19 2015 14:12 LightningStrike wrote: Town: Eden: Played with before when he was Mafia and Town but we he seems to be town this game. Geript: Toneread says town he seems to ask some good questions. Snickers: Being extremely serious and giving his thoughts freely it kind of reminds me of a more serious me. Oatsmaster: Trying to get discussions going with pms and stuff but also he just being himself as town this game. Liancourt: He seems interested this game which is a good sign for him being town although I never him play as Mafia before. Null: Koshi: 1 post from him this game and it isn't really alignment indicative. sicklucker: I can't read him anymore on Day 1 after playing with him when he was Mafia and I was town. Also his Day 1 is bad. VisceraEyes: 1 post and wasn't alignment indicative need more posts from him. That's a goddamn huge list for so early into the game. It also seems to be only based on activity, nothing else. All arguments for people being town seem vague like its their purpose. Like reasoning for geript being town? He asks some good questions. If not all, which ones then? Why are they good? Snickers reasoning is based on him being serious and geript called him out on flip-flopping on his attitude already, so how does that work? Oats has done nothing than to suggest an IRC meeting (which worked quite well in Arkham Asylum although I claimed to Palmar, the third party - Joker quite fast >_>) I also don't see this interest in Liancourt. As for Eden I totally don't understand the reasoning. LS, you got ripped off on the Weekly Mafia Fair, should've brought gold coin with you, not lead coin. ##vote LightningStrike Geript's given me good vibes. He seems totes relaxed which makes me both happy and unnerved; I really expected him to at some point of conversation with Snickers to shout out "WHERE IS EVERYONE?". Snickers seems genuine though. I shall reiterate: geript righteously called him out on changing his temper but I believe that's just the case of overconfidence. For now. Eden was present for a long time from the very start and did not seem to be engaged in Snickers-Geript convo till later, which I find scummy. It is as if he feared getting involved at that point, because that'd put him in too much of a spotlight. He also wishes for people to PM him instead keeping his bone-box shut and doing it himself. Another person behaving suspiciously considering PMs is Koshi who wants people to post their "good PM logs" after "they're finished". Why? Why do you need this information? People converse privately to withdraw information from Mafia, why would they publish it? Why do you care? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 19 2015 22:51 liancourt wrote: there must be an alternative to quicktopic. I cba to proxy everytime i want to talk. What's the point of proxy? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
Tell me Snickers, didn't you feel that geript asking you questions was like through a glass? With some distance? Like they were comfy questions and had little to no follow-up? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 06:10 Snickers wrote: I am really dumb. What are you implying kurumi? Don't you think that his questions were merely to be there and did not look for any follow-up? Don't you think the reaction was too soft for the amount of questioning happening (and negative attitude towards your towniness)? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
I told you he gave me good vibes, yes? I noted that his style was weird though, correct? I've gotten hold on new information. Geript seems to be soft-pushing Snickers. He asked you about your read on him. My initial concerns have proven to be true, my initial good will is eclipsed by such observation. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 06:39 Snickers wrote: Was your concern that I was mafia or was your concern that geript was mafia? My main concern was that you are both Mafia. I know now that it is close to impossible to be as such. Your behaviour has not struck me as weird in opposition to geript's behaviour. He was 'off'. He was right, but 'off'. It reminds me of Ace going on Kavdragon, Kavdragon flipping and flopping as Town and Mafia Ace using that to push him relentlessly for the entire day. @Koshi I never said that Snickers is Mafia in qt. I only said that the convo between him and geript seems unnatural. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 06:45 Koshi wrote: Ok fine. Now explain to me why Snickers is town. The guy has yet to call somebody mafia. His first post was something I don't understand. The next 5 posts were him defending himself against geript. Doing that pretty poorly as I pointed out. calling geript mafia but not really. In his latest return he made a blob of words saying nothing. Tell me why geript isn't voting for Snickers if the reason for people to vote for Snickers is his interaction with geript. Tell me why geript is fishing interest in voting Snickers. It doesn't sound well, doesn't it? You have played with geript. He is a guy that will stick to a person and never let go if he thinks that is the right thing to do. He is interested in lynching Snickers but is not really leading the lynch. Get me? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 06:47 Snickers wrote: Can you elaborate on the bolded part? Why is it impossible? What do you mean that he was off? What is he right about? Also if you think it would be beneficial explain your quick topics. Why did you start them? Is there a specific number of them? I am in one with you and two others so I assuming there is four main ones. How did you choose which people go into which quick topic. Geript is a direct guy. That's how he rolls. He acquires a target and then runs that target to the ground. Here he got a target and started to push others to roll the target over. He was right that you were losing your confidence steam. Same story as with Kavdragon in PYP:I. There are five quicktopics as names suggest. The people I picked were pretty much random, it depends on how well I know a person. I started them before the game even began. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 07:03 Snickers wrote: Ok were they distributed before the game began? You could of formed them and then not send them out to people correct? I think they lead to a null read. And i disagree about the whole confidence thing. Waste of time to try and convince you of that so lets just drop it. Thanks for informing me. I could not distribute them before the game began. I distribtuted them around 30 minutes before my first post. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
We're going 88 miles per hour ![[image loading]](http://www.hittingthestage.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/lloyd-back-to-the-future-1024x576.jpg) I know, this is quite unexpected. Arkham Asylum was a great game. It really was dark and gritty, full of great plays, awesome with Palmar's Joker comics by the end of the game. Our game-wide IRC convos. Two threads at once both being very important to be a part of. There was a guy called notasmurf. Notasmurf has devised a great plan. Plan I have reused. Plan I believe has worked once again. Say hello to Operation Honeypot. I have set up five quicktopics before the game started. I would've used them differently as scum but it wasn't as sharp as the town version. Only one of them had four people including me, rest was three including me. Two quicktopics have been compromised. Those two are: VisceraEyes, LightiningStrike and geript, Oatsmaster. In both of them there is one person that should not get an access to the QT. Snickers never accessed his to my knowledge. Showtime boys. Why were you sharing QTs with anyone? I don't care that there are three of you and I have only one too much. Maybe your partner is Onegu, who has not accessed my qt either. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:01 Eden1892 wrote: The compromising-QTs thing is pretty cool, but I have a feeling it's not going to lead anywhere. I won't say why until it doesn't though, because if you did catch someone, I don't want to give them an out. Boy, believe me it is legit. I have two Internet connections at hand and four devices. Enough to test it again myself - and you can guess that I did so. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:19 geript wrote: @Kurumi. I actually don't believe any of that shit. I'm pretty sure it's BS too. Because I literally just created a QT and then sent myself access through my PM so I could easily access it on my phone. I didn't even post from my phone in that QT. Both register as separate unique views AND I haven't given that test QT to anyone. Like anyone could set this up and check it for themselves. I'm pretty sure that operation honeypot was a complete failure at best because I know that the Oats/me QT hasn't been compromised at all now. As for VE/LS, IDK but I'm pretty sure LS has played from phone in the past (could check but lazy) so it wouldn't surprise me that. It would depend on the number of unique views potentially, but I know for sure that since me/oats/you QT only has 4 unique views I don't see how that's comprimised. I know I've accessed and posted from my phone to that QT. Are you logged in on quicktopic on your phone? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:25 geript wrote: Yes to both. I've been logged in on my phone since forever. Interesting. I have checked it two ways - one accidental, other on purpose. I checked another qt from my phone - without logging in. Then I logged in and some time later I logged on my PC with qt account ready. There was another person in the qt - there were 3 Unique views. I wanted to recreate this situation but I dun goofed and was logged in on my phone - I had only 1 unique view. When I grabbed a second PC and did not log in I got the view. Logging in after that has not changed anything. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:28 Koshi wrote: It doesn't say you are an other user if you are logged in. Because I read the QT at work and at home. And ours wasn't infiltrated. True. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:34 geript wrote: idk. maybe I wasn't actually signed in it just let me post under my name without being signed in. All I know is that it took my phone and computer as 2 unique views in the qt I created. Like there are a million ways to test this. Even still, the important question has been unanswered as of yet. Kurumi, why didn't you wait for more than +1 unique view? Won't get more if Onegu, who is afk, is scum. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:44 geript wrote: This is actually something that I strongly disagree with. No QTs being comprimised doesn't prove anything. What's more interested to me isn't whether a QT was comprimised or not, but rather the fact that he revealed this with just 1 "extra" unique view in 2 different QTs. Like, that's not in any way actually damning because of how often people play from multiple places (work, home, library, phone, etc.). It could be damning if just one qt had an 'extra' unique view (being the third mafia); but two having a similar extra is possible multiple ways. It actually leads credence to neither unique view being important unless he also created further QTs with myself, oats, ve and LS. Like he'd actually be able to single out who the extra unique view is coming from. Rather, he spilled his beans early. Which I find rather odd because as town, he has the potential to set this up in such a way to almost guarantee mafia. But he didn't. He just spouts it out. That actually tells me that he's not actually expecting to find mafia with it. Which IS rather telling. If somebody would log in anywhere else it'd log but also tell me it was an unregistered user. Registered users are unique and that's it. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:50 geript wrote: Except that I know that's not true. I literally have done this twice now and it's worked exactly opposite for me "What we found out is that for every registered visitor that views the forum, a visitor is counted. This gives us a new statistic that we should consider. The Registered Users statistic. This is (unique visitors) – (unregistered Visitors)." We had 4 registered users. 0 unregistered. So 4 unique accounts. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 20 2015 08:53 VisceraEyes wrote: At any rate, it wasn't me because I told rayn in private that I suspected that you might be doing something like this like as soon as you sent me the link. Why would I share it with my scumbuddies KNOWING what you're looking for (having been in the game in question)? Why did you tell him for all that is divine?! | ||
| ||
