It's a non-claim. There's no miller in setup. Why would I care about a nothing claim over someone afaik I haven't played with who made an interesting opening. It just feels like you're opening is distinctly different from the rest of your posts in a very odd way and I want a read on you.

so interesting it merited no acknowledgment

i just want to be the funniest player on tl

geript what's your read on Kit-Kat right now? admittedly, I don't really see where your questions are going, but from a recent past experience coaching a game you were in, I know that I tended to think that about all your questions

and you DID usually end up somewhere decent. so where yat right now?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 01:46 GMT

#76

also my inbox is lonely.

it's been a long while since i've used pm's in a game, so unless someone feels like giving a scrub a crash course, i'm probs just gonna rely on the thread itself

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 02:17 GMT

#85

On February 19 2015 11:15 Snickers wrote:
I'm seriously not trying to be rude. But I wasn't asking whether or not you thought I was scum. That was clear. I was wondering if you were misunderstanding me or just wanting me to look scum. You think I've been rude but idk I thought my posts have been nice.

Also why would tone be an alignment tell. Especially the first post. It seems too early to be thinking about that.

i don't really see how he would know whether he's misunderstanding you

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 02:28 GMT

#89

On February 19 2015 11:21 Snickers wrote:
Eden do you think I was rude in my first post?

Maybe if I ask him about he would realize maybes hes being quick to judge.

Also if I'm new to the game, I wouldn't know that it is so crazy to not pm people. Seems kinda weird to miss that.

not rude, no, but i don't think geript was saying you were being rude so much as you were putting yourself out there

let's talk about this latter bit instead - why do you refuse to use pm's? i can understand not feeling confident in being able to use them well (i'm sorta in that camp), but they still seem like an effective tool to use in solving the game. leaving a potentially-useful tool in the shed on purpose when you're leaving for a job generally seems like a bad idea without a good reason for believing it won't be necessary/useful. what's your reason?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 04:14 GMT

#119

yes yes everyone think long and hard about my miller claim

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 04:16 GMT

#120

On February 19 2015 11:44 Snickers wrote:
Before this game started, I decided not to use pms. Its not mandatory so why even do it. I never saw it would cause this much of a ruckus. Also do I really want to figure out what I should and should not be pming people. Geript pmed me and was implying I should have sent him my role already? That seems like the exact opposite of what I should be doing.

Geript seems to expect a lot from me even though he said I havent played a alot. Idk seems weird to me.

Also, if I am so new why would I do some huge ass, really obvious post that would draw attention to me. It was really close to the game start so chances are my twos scum buddies wouldnt be around. Am I really going to screw my two teammates like that? If was really confident yes. But I don't think I have been and I find it funny Geript would miss this if he was being genuine.

oof, defensive

i'm just asking. i don't know my way around pm games as well b/c it's been a while since i had one, but from games ~a yr ago where i used it somewhat effectively, i understand the potential it has, so i was wondering why you wrote it off

so you just don't see much of a benefit to pm'ing then?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 04:17 GMT

#121

On February 19 2015 12:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
Im real sad geript didnt pm me

.

Miller claim is fake and pointless.

Snickers doing some weird ass shit. (scum)
Have you ever played a pm game before snickers?

what has butterfingers done that you think is scummy? (weird, sure, but i'm curious about scummy)

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 06:10 GMT

#151

On February 19 2015 15:02 sicklucker wrote:
Oh great another day 1 fixated on me

overreaction much?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 06:34 GMT

#154

Yeah that is kinda odd

VE what are you doing?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 06:35 GMT

#155

Oh he's not even actually voting yet

lol

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 18:17 GMT

#249

I like Oats this game. Maybe he's just improved recently but he's a lot more in-the-mix this game than I remember him being in the recent past. I get where he's coming from in general and I especially liked that he was trying to set a "trap" so to speak by testing other players' reasoning to see if it lined up with what they should have suspected at the time.

Ray also had some good posts. His big post recently about SL was pretty baller. I haven't got the scattershot townie vibes I normally get from SL. Where you at?

Eden1892

United States5866 Posts

February 19 2015 18:29 GMT

#256

On February 20 2015 02:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
Voting then constructing a reason afterward is scummy. I have no idea if you did it in the situation but mafia has been caught before for calling someone scum then solely using evidence after he initially called that dude scum.

Also I wanted to see if you knew your read well enough to distill it to the most important bits. Which indicates your familiarity and confidence in your read.

Its alright.

Based on 2 posts.

Meh Im not convinced.

This is what I'm referencing - he doesn't call it a "trap" but that's the idea