VII Titanic Mini Mafia: I Have a Cunning Plan... - Page 16
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
1. Don't say anything: Town basically straight up loses because it is very likely that at least one, if not both the JKs get lynched. Worst case scenario, imo. 2. Say something: This sucks for mafia because there are basically two mod-confirmed town right off the bat (even though a part of town still doubted this until the very end), on the flip side both the save roles are outed. Town-favored, since it mod confirms two town and prevents mafia from fake claiming their roles at any point. 3. Say something and restart the game: I think this might have been a decent solution, since it was only day 1. This gives both town and mafia some insight as to what the set up is. However, it is still town-favored since the exact number of roles are now known so a fake claim is slightly harder. I think the best way to prevent this sort of situation is to tell both JKs that there is another JK in their role PM. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 20:28 Palmar wrote: If town is moronic enough to lynch off setup speculations, that's their problem. Not mine. They both got the exact same role names. I don't know, maybe town needed a hard wake up call in this regard. But then we'd have townies bringing heat to Sent in post-game. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 20:29 marvellosity wrote: This really is town's problem to deal with. Flavour is always just flavour, and there was nothing in the ruleset preventing there being 2 JKs. The compensation for the difficulty in understanding there are 2 JKs is, well, the fact that town has 2 god-damn JKs. Town just needs to apply logic + reads. Does scumBH claim JK in that spot? (maybe) Does he have the appropriate crumbs ready? Does scumEden counterclaim JK in that spot for a bizarro 1 for 1? Does this ever happen, ever? (hint: no) The setup allows for 7 medics and 3 vigilantes, it's up to town to sort out who is what and why. The problem for me was that BH's claim came out of nowhere. I'm not sure why town was so eager to jump on a wagon though. In retrospect and in light of Palmar and your arguments respectively, I think it may have been better to have town just suicide in order to learn. I'd like to imagine I would disassemble the wagons regardless of the mod post. I did not really believe either of the claims were mafia coming into the thread. Maybe too much fantasy, though. :D | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 20:36 Palmar wrote: This is the reasons I create setups with a mason. A single mason, who can talk to all the other masons. All of who are himself. Remarkable, no doubt. :D Also, Sent, the spreadsheet link is broken. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 20:37 rsoultin wrote: lol I just called TP stupid for CCing there. Why does doc CC on Day 1 anyway? JK/doc, whatever. I just 100% wouldn't. You're useless doing that even if you believe the other guy is mafia. I never understand this. Like Slam, he played his role perfectly. Didn't bother with CCing the fake cop claims, just kept plugging along. 1v1 trade with mafia is always favorable for town. I do agree that you should evaluate the claim appropriately, but it might lose you the game and catch you flak during post-game. ![]() | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
You're Sent now. ![]() | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 20:44 rsoultin wrote: no, I agree that a 1v1 trade with mafia is favorable for town so if you're in mylo, great, but day 1? you still have the chance to gain more lynches due to good doctoring ![]() eh, but I guess not everyone agrees with that If you encounter a good mafia fake claim and you let the claim go unchecked it's very possible you're gonna get rekt if you do that. x: Like you're literally losing a lynch and missing the opportunity to lynch confirmed mafia. If your role gets claimed and you think the person claiming is mafia, you CC 100%. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
I paid too much respect to the opinions of people who put a lot of time into the game (including rso), and it really fucked up my d2 play (though my d1 play was quite shit as well). Next time I'm going to be adamant about my own opinion. Also, I'm going to pay more attention to rayn's reads if/after he's confirmed town. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 21:04 marvellosity wrote: I'm not sure this is what you should be taking away really. It's good to listen to other people. Your problem would be (if I go by this paragraph alone) that you were putting faith in someone with a lot of posts and not correctly being suspicious of their motives. Listening to others is dandy, just make sure they're town first The problem was mostly that I was listening to people because I thought they had put a lot of time into the game, even though I was disagreeing with what they were saying. I agree that listening and cooperating with people is key to the game, but that time put into the game is a wrong metric to follow (it was mostly guilt that I had put less time into the game than others, which led me to pursue my own reads less because I felt it would be unfair). | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 21:05 rsoultin wrote: super, you played well, no worries i'm looking forward to playing with you when we're both town again ^^ Thanks, but I could have played better. ![]() ![]() | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 25 2015 21:18 ritoky wrote: Some people try harder as town, some people try harder as mafia. People's investment in the game should not be alignment indicative unless they have a very distinct meta that someone who has played lots with them can elaborate on and give reasonable evidence for. Also as town, err on the side of suspicion. Absolutely. I know this as well, but for guilt-reasons I was unwilling to step on toes. Never again. ![]() | ||
| ||