|
On February 01 2015 03:40 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 03:08 rsoultin wrote: LS' play has gotten progressively more townie as the game went on, imo. I, too, found his read on SL odd, so I can't blame Damdred for that.
If Damdy still thinks that LS is scum, though, I'd like to hear why. People not reading thread get Scum points strike one to hts and rs
-_- meh. forgot about your reaction to the FF case
anyway, why is palmar making you chuckle significant?
|
On February 01 2015 04:20 marvellosity wrote: rsoultin might actually be mafia though
lots of town-passes, lots of no-lynch-today passes, very few suspicions or pushes
xP hi pot
More no-lynch than town, but essentially you're correct. I'm not seeing anyone jumping out at me today, and contrary to popular opinion I actually don't just randomly tunnel people for the lolz.
|
On February 01 2015 00:17 rsoultin wrote: Okay, HtS, I stand corrected.
I like where your head is on your reads on me and FF. You get a town pass today.
^ that was the reason. Which, ironically enough, was actually stated in the post.
|
On February 01 2015 01:20 rsoultin wrote: Unless it's to avoid a medic save.
Badumdum. <3 you Eden.
Okay, well, talking in circles. Where I'm at right now is despite wanting to give Truffle a chance to break in his new town play, if he doesn't step it up I'm totally behind lynching him today.
FF and Palmar feel more like policy lynches to me.
SL I just don't know about. It's very possible he could be scum but I always think that about him so I don't know. One thing that stood out about me regarding him is he's just not up to his usual mind-fuckery town antics so far this game. I don't know that the rage! based on what his meta said thing is scum SL or just irrational SL.
^ That.
I've questioned him about reading LS town for hard townreading him but it's SL. If you've got a good way to read the spaz, please let me know.
If anything, I like FFs reasoning for voting him best. He's not spazzing the thread much this game.
|
On February 01 2015 04:39 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:27 marvellosity wrote: "she's not looking town and because of that i don't want to lynch her because when she looks town she's scum"
"i'm not going to pressure her in any way to discern her alignment though, i'm just going to give her a pass"
"i'm so town"
rsoultin ^ best case in the thread
If this is truly the best case, this thread needs life support xP
Daaaammmdred.
|
On February 01 2015 04:41 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:35 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 01:20 rsoultin wrote:
[...]
SL I just don't know about. It's very possible he could be scum but I always think that about him so I don't know. One thing that stood out about me regarding him is he's just not up to his usual mind-fuckery town antics so far this game. I don't know that the rage! based on what his meta said thing is scum SL or just irrational SL. ^ That. I've questioned him about reading LS town for hard townreading him but it's SL. If you've got a good way to read the spaz, please let me know. [...] Then why aren't you pushing sicklucker (further) or asking him about it? You have a meta point on his "town antics" so that's something you could have used to flesh things out with him.
Lol do you see him in the thread, hun?
What exactly do you expect him to answer when I ask him why he's not being a spaz this time around?
|
On February 01 2015 04:43 marvellosity wrote: why are you appealing to Damdred?
Cause he still hasn't answered my question. (i.e. not an appeal)
|
On February 01 2015 04:45 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:42 rsoultin wrote: If this is truly the best case, this thread needs life support xP
Daaaammmdred. You're not helping yourself here exactly...you aren't particularly assertive this game. At all. This is my fourth game with you so I am qualified here to say that something isn't quite right. Step it up m'lady. ##unvote ##vote Rasputin
Ya know, I do kinda get where y'all get the misconception that I'm always aggressive, but I actually need something hitting me in the face to want to chase after.
I'm not seeing that. And I'm really not understanding where anyone else is seeing it, either.
Not going to just RNG someone to tunnel to satisfy y'all's expectations of my "bulldog" reputation, thank you much.
|
On February 01 2015 04:46 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:45 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 04:43 marvellosity wrote: why are you appealing to Damdred? Cause he still hasn't answered my question. (i.e. not an appeal) and you've basically not bothered answering what i'm pushing you for. why is that?
Marv.
HtS is a player who as town in the games I've played with her, I've had to stick my neck out for because she was being scumread. Our first game together it almost got me lynched in last-minute shenannies cause I hammered the other wagon instead of her while reading her town when no one else was. In Carol, again, for saying something silly to Bunnies and later jumping on a bad shenanigans vote I started.
The one game she was being townread by everyone she was scum.
That's why I don't think her not reading super town is a good reason to call her scum.
I do like where she was coming from with her read on FF and myself, though, and that mindset appears townie to me.
|
On February 01 2015 04:52 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:49 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 04:45 Half the Sky wrote:On February 01 2015 04:42 rsoultin wrote: If this is truly the best case, this thread needs life support xP
Daaaammmdred. You're not helping yourself here exactly...you aren't particularly assertive this game. At all. This is my fourth game with you so I am qualified here to say that something isn't quite right. Step it up m'lady. ##unvote ##vote Rasputin Ya know, I do kinda get where y'all get the misconception that I'm always aggressive, but I actually need something hitting me in the face to want to chase after. I'm not seeing that. And I'm really not understanding where anyone else is seeing it, either. Not going to just RNG someone to tunnel to satisfy y'all's expectations of my "bulldog" reputation, thank you much. I still don't know why have (or at least think you have) a tunneling reputation. Your play seems fine to me. But you really aren't scumreading anyone at this point?
Lol, it sounds bad and I should just throw out names to appease the masses, but I'm not seeing it. Your entrance has been better. Others are just question marks.
I'm not certain about several people, including Damdred, SL and Robik...Palmar for me would be a policy lynch though the vets are calling it a meta read...
But as for strong lynch them now scum, no.
|
On February 01 2015 05:01 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:59 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 04:52 Trfel wrote:On February 01 2015 04:49 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 04:45 Half the Sky wrote:On February 01 2015 04:42 rsoultin wrote: If this is truly the best case, this thread needs life support xP
Daaaammmdred. You're not helping yourself here exactly...you aren't particularly assertive this game. At all. This is my fourth game with you so I am qualified here to say that something isn't quite right. Step it up m'lady. ##unvote ##vote Rasputin Ya know, I do kinda get where y'all get the misconception that I'm always aggressive, but I actually need something hitting me in the face to want to chase after. I'm not seeing that. And I'm really not understanding where anyone else is seeing it, either. Not going to just RNG someone to tunnel to satisfy y'all's expectations of my "bulldog" reputation, thank you much. I still don't know why have (or at least think you have) a tunneling reputation. Your play seems fine to me. But you really aren't scumreading anyone at this point? Lol, it sounds bad and I should just throw out names to appease the masses, but I'm not seeing it. Your entrance has been better. Others are just question marks. I'm not certain about several people, including Damdred, SL and Robik...Palmar for me would be a policy lynch though the vets are calling it a meta read... But as for strong lynch them now scum, no. I want to believe you. I really do. I've felt the exact same way in the recent past. It was the game where I was mafia.
And your strong scumread is...?
|
On February 01 2015 05:01 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:59 marvellosity wrote: does it remind you of kels in carol? lol i guess a bit? not particularly Show nested quote +On January 31 2015 14:23 rsoultin wrote: I'm bored.
I like HF this game.
Still deciding on most of the rest of y'all...entertain me. Especially FF. You boring, bro.
Also, HTS, but I'm thinking (read: hoping) she actually becomes interesting tomorrow.
Going to bed for once. Ciao. this strikes me as a bit weird because rsoul said hts being uninteresting/underwhelming was towny but she wants hts to become more interesting which would give the opposite read??
Friggin a.
My reads of HTS have in general been independent of thread opinion, as I just pointed out. At the time I posted about her being boring her filter was entirely excuses and one list post she posted drunk.
I am allowed to say that when she's being universally townread it probably is her scumgame, while still making my own read on her. When she returned to the thread I liked her pushes.
|
On February 01 2015 05:09 marvellosity wrote: no when she's being scumread she is scum
both HF and I scumread HF day 1 in Void and we were both right.
Do you want a metal?
The other times she was being scumread she was town.
All that proves is that in that game you two were right.
|
On February 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:59 rsoultin wrote: I'm not certain about several people, including Damdred, SL and Robik...Palmar for me would be a policy lynch though the vets are calling it a meta read...
But as for strong lynch them now scum, no. Wait, what? 1 You have yet to interact with Robik or even discuss him from what I'm seeing in your filter. So where did any read on Robik come from? Did I miss something? 2 You said earlier you wanted to get behind Damdred's read, you appealled to Damdred, and now all of a sudden you're not certain of him? Where did this come from? Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 04:42 rsoultin wrote: If this is truly the best case, this thread needs life support xP
Daaaammmdred. Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 00:43 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 00:40 Damdred wrote: I was looking at Trfel filter again and a few things popped up at me that raised a red flag.
Really hard disbelief/doubt on robik claim when it happened. This is interesting to me because of the difference in what Trfel did and thread. People were mad at Rob claiming but believed it, brownies generally believe claims due to it adding more information and game being slightly easier even if it's bad. Mafia already knew partial setup, and disbelief to robik claim could be a Scum slip from to much info.
Moving on thread presence is really down and lots of excuses about why he's not posting much.
Lastly a pretty decent sized list post with no conclusive reads no Scum reads just really noncommittal reads,
Trfel is scum I could get behind this read.Chezi already said the same thing you know. It's why I said he gets a no-lynch pass from me today. ![](/mirror/smilies/wink.gif)
I coulda sworn someone asked me about Robik and I just said that with the claim there was no sense voting him today, but down the line if he keeps acting like he is he's on the table.
I've also already questioned Damdred on names (like Trfel's) appearing in his list of possible lynchables without an explanation.
The Trfel thing was in response to that nullish reads post, and it was what Chezi was commenting on before. I also said that I wanted to give Trfel more time, if only because I know he's trying to change his game right now.
|
On February 01 2015 05:19 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 05:08 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 05:01 Holyflare wrote:On February 01 2015 04:59 marvellosity wrote: does it remind you of kels in carol? lol i guess a bit? not particularly On January 31 2015 14:23 rsoultin wrote: I'm bored.
I like HF this game.
Still deciding on most of the rest of y'all...entertain me. Especially FF. You boring, bro.
Also, HTS, but I'm thinking (read: hoping) she actually becomes interesting tomorrow.
Going to bed for once. Ciao. this strikes me as a bit weird because rsoul said hts being uninteresting/underwhelming was towny but she wants hts to become more interesting which would give the opposite read?? Friggin a. My reads of HTS have in general been independent of thread opinion, as I just pointed out. At the time I posted about her being boring her filter was entirely excuses and one list post she posted drunk. I am allowed to say that when she's being universally townread it probably is her scumgame, while still making my own read on her. When she returned to the thread I liked her pushes. still don't understand this, the fact that you are town reading hts and like her pushes and everyone else is saying the same thing makes your meta ..... irrelevant if you are town reading her but you're still sticking to it like it's true?
You guys really expect me to base my read on HTS entirely on whether or not the rest of the thread was townreading her?
I am trying to narrow down my lynch options, which was why I considered underwhelming play from HTS not enough to vote her today. Her play has picked up significantly since then.
I do not know how else to explain this to you beyond I am not an irrational dipshit to say HTS is being scumread therefore she must be town! or viceversa.
|
On February 01 2015 05:33 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2015 05:29 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 05:19 Holyflare wrote:On February 01 2015 05:08 rsoultin wrote:On February 01 2015 05:01 Holyflare wrote:On February 01 2015 04:59 marvellosity wrote: does it remind you of kels in carol? lol i guess a bit? not particularly On January 31 2015 14:23 rsoultin wrote: I'm bored.
I like HF this game.
Still deciding on most of the rest of y'all...entertain me. Especially FF. You boring, bro.
Also, HTS, but I'm thinking (read: hoping) she actually becomes interesting tomorrow.
Going to bed for once. Ciao. this strikes me as a bit weird because rsoul said hts being uninteresting/underwhelming was towny but she wants hts to become more interesting which would give the opposite read?? Friggin a. My reads of HTS have in general been independent of thread opinion, as I just pointed out. At the time I posted about her being boring her filter was entirely excuses and one list post she posted drunk. I am allowed to say that when she's being universally townread it probably is her scumgame, while still making my own read on her. When she returned to the thread I liked her pushes. still don't understand this, the fact that you are town reading hts and like her pushes and everyone else is saying the same thing makes your meta ..... irrelevant if you are town reading her but you're still sticking to it like it's true? You guys really expect me to base my read on HTS entirely on whether or not the rest of the thread was townreading her? I am trying to narrow down my lynch options, which was why I considered underwhelming play from HTS not enough to vote her today. Her play has picked up significantly since then. I do not know how else to explain this to you beyond I am not an irrational dipshit to say HTS is being scumread therefore she must be town! or viceversa. well that's not entirely the problem we have? you've just said that you DON'T base your read entirely on thread sentiment or if she's playing towny - which meant that what you said earlier wasn't very accurate. Fine, that's ok, make your own reads. However, if this read isn't entirely based on it then why on earth would you give her a town pass for being underwhelming????
I didn't. I gave her a townpass for her read on me, and then on FF. A post I've already quoted once.
|
To answer y'all's question...or implication I guess...as to why I'm not pushing any of you pushing me is I think most of the pressure, if not all, is coming from town -_-
None of you were the ones I thought would be good lynches today, and even if you're wrong I can see where your arguments are coming from, so I have no reason to change that opinion.
And yeah, Trfel, looking back through her filter that was a hypocritical statement for me to make.
What is with super townreading Damdred, may I ask? Cause I think marv and FF have both alluded to it now and I'm just not feeling it.
|
On February 01 2015 05:41 Trfel wrote: Rsoultin, what do you think of me now? Earlier, you were willing to lynch me.
Earlier all you had were excuses and a post full of nullish reads again. I specifically said that you were trying to change your style, and I'd give you a chance to see if you picked it up. You did. I'm fine with you.
|
Okay, I guess what I really don't understand is the progression of Damdred's read on Palmar.
On January 31 2015 23:22 Damdred wrote: Edens posts are interesting, they make sense. I actually like them right now, explained himself then went to pressure sl. I probably wouldn't lynch Eden today then if he keeps this up.
I might be willing to lynch Palmar
On February 01 2015 00:04 Damdred wrote: Hts posts are good I think.
Also Palmar is a policy lynch at best it's pretty obvious.
On February 01 2015 00:22 Damdred wrote: Also rs marv said his reason in his filter about Palmar begging out of a lynch? You don't like his reasons or missed it?
So is it a policy lynch or isn't it?
On February 01 2015 00:22 Damdred wrote: Also rs marv said his reason in his filter about Palmar begging out of a lynch? You don't like his reasons or missed it?
Still don't understand what this has to do with anything, and it's the question I've been trying to get him to answer.
On February 01 2015 04:54 Damdred wrote: Ok so Palmar response is great. Mr. Lynch/Palomar isn't getting lynched today. Look up super bowl interview with lynch, so great.
Catching up
Or this -_-
I mean, seriously, I can just say I don't want to be lynched over and over, too. Maybe I'm missing something but this really doesn't make any sense to me.
|
On February 01 2015 00:24 rsoultin wrote:No. I see no point in lynching a claimed role Day 1. For being the amazing town leader to sheep to victory, he's been especially useless, and I'd probably lynch him later if he continues as he is, but not today.
This was about Robik @HTS.
Easy to miss when I didn't have his name in there.
|
|
|
|