EPTOn December 20 2014 11:07 liancourt wrote:
Gb stop sheeping my reads
Gb stop sheeping my reads
You just said scum is probably going to kill HTS... I have no idea why you say this by the way.
Why do you say this?
TL Mafia LXIX: Carol Of The Bells - Page 21
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
You just said scum is probably going to kill HTS... I have no idea why you say this by the way. Why do you say this? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Hm. You don't look tired of trying to lynch HF here | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 14 2014 05:47 liancourt wrote: This is such a bad reason. If u vote kel there will be enough votes Wow. Look at the nested quote. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Took me too long to realise, sorry. I'm with you, Vivax. I think your analysis is informative. HTS, Xat and Templar makes a lot of sense. But oats is playing this game so indifferently that it makes me shiver. Maybe he is a possible 4 mafia? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 20 2014 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote: you guys said so much useless shit man. Sorry, you have been extremely useful in this game, I'd love to play of your way | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 21 2014 03:18 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah what a difference right. man. I kinda agree with your list vivax. yeah ok seems alright. I thought we talked nonsense | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Lol It's already night4, he had all the chances he needed | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
NONONONO WHY!!!!! | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 21 2014 08:31 rsoultin wrote: Hm. It is more likely that Nigella saved/RBd Xatalos than we had two interactions last night... There is no possible world where nigella saves Xatalos Are you out of your mind? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
FF is been under suspicious of being the godfather Xatalos was under suspicious of but mafia Nigella tried to roleblock a possible mafia or tried to save a more probable town (you, for instance) | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
We are taking about intentions, not mechanics | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Alright, listen. We've discuss a lot about HF and we couldn't get him lynched easily. We almost said everything that has to be said about him. I don't think we should waste more breath about him TODAY. We have to catch the other scum. By the way, is there someone firmly believing that HF is town? This is important so please answer me. Now, I believe we should follow Vivax reads because (1) I agreed with him and (2) we now know he is confirmed town. Considering this, I believe we should lynch Xatalos Why Xatalos instead of oats? Because he wasn't firmly mafia read by Vivax, because he was town read by obi, and because HF, one possible scum, also list him as mafia. I'm aware HF also lists Xatalos, but there are these two that didn't cite/townreads oats. I don't want to risk the game on him yet. I don't believe nigella would protect FF because he could be godfather and I don't believe nigella would block Xatalos because he wasn't actually the top scumread. But I really think nigella would try to roleblock a possible mafia because top town was Vivax at that moment. I also want you to remember that ff is only SOFT CONFIRMED, because Santa didn't explicitly said he had a green check. Nigella, don't out anymore. You'll be important night5, specially if we lynch scum and if you roleblock one mafia. Like, consider this: if there is only 3 scum left and we lynch one now, you'll try to roleblock a possible mafia and if only one kp goes through the night, you have a confirmed mafia. So, lynch Xatalos. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 21 2014 09:53 rsoultin wrote: What about Templar? You mentioned Oats and Xata but not Templar. Templar is also an option. I could lynch both. I have a preference on Xatalos because I have more experience with him and he is MUCH more active and try harder than this. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 21 2014 19:19 Alakaslam wrote: Xata null oats scummy GB mood swing, usually townie. Concise. I can't understand how you find Xata null. Reasons would be awesome  | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Xat, inactivity is not really the problem. The problem is that I can't see you dropping your thoughts clearly in the thread or actually trying to solve the game like I'm used to see you doing. I remember perfectly me getting all crazy in you for you saying "If he isn't town, he is scum", lol. This was after a long description of your thought process. I don't see any of these things in your filter. Actually, I see more rough, objective reads, without too many stream of thoughts, which, in my experience, isn't your usual play. @Rsoultin: Oats: probably scum due to inactivity. If town is degladiating themselves, scum will usually sit back and let town die. This image fits oats behaviour. This is how scum usually plays big games. More than this, oats tends to be more contributive, actually calling people scum and going for it. I usually see oats doing this as town: "you're stupid, you're wrong, because of this." In this game, he is just saying "you're stupid, you're wrong". He says everything me and Vivax speak of is convoluted, but then agrees with Vivax list. I have yet to understand he logic behind this. I've explained Xat on the first paragraph. Slam: I don't know man. I saw things that makes me believe slam is town. But I think slam would be more involved in the game when it's LYLO, like he was in Avogadro Mafia. The worst part now is that he is clearly reading the thread, as you ask him for reads and he answers, but doesn't provide reasoning. This is a sign that slam may be mafia. So I'm going from town to null on him. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
There is the votecount on day2 where mafia did seen to want a lynch on FF. Rasputin, you asked for our reads but I see no follow up on them. What do you make of it? Also, have in mind that a meta case is never an awesome case. Because it's meta. I'll make it anyway, later, cause I'm going to the beach with a date  | ||
| ||
