|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:10 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. Agreeing with you and nb simultaneously about what froggy said is a contradiction, especially considering that what nb said about froggy was a contradiction in itself. I think HTS is scummy for that.
She doesn't agree with nb. Nb says thay people that talk about policy are scummy usually and then says that HE isn't scummy but instead an easy scum read to jump on (implying mislynch) and tries to stop that pressure which is 2 contradictory statements. She's contradictory.
Hts just explains his posts meaning and says it's null but scum reads bunnies for what I said. Don't see how they are the same at all.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:20 batsnacks wrote:
HF can we do that thing this game where I'll tell you if I think you're flying off the rails?
When does this even happen?? Unless you mean stopping me from policying randomers over my own reads then yea please.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:20 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:15 Holyflare wrote:On December 09 2014 10:09 KelsierSC wrote:On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. i gave you and bats as town right my ff read isn't an easy read at all. so I'm not throwing out easy reads at all. Anyway I explained bats did the analysis on hts and it felt towny to me. Plus his manner feels like the other town games bats has played You gave me a town read based on meta that is incomplete and didn't really factor in any game info other than "pressuring" which when you couple with my actual meta would mean nothing at all. Yet, when I say otherwise you somehow know it's still "town" Holyflare pressure rather than mafia. Your bats read as I explained to anyone looking critically does not make any sense at all but he's still a d1 town list. I can see you making an analysis point on him but what about the stuff I just explained? Why was he still a town read after I pointed out he was picking and choosing who scum were based on absolutely nothing (he even just admitted it)! well no i dont have perfect information on you. But if your play feels like it did when you are town, and you do towny actions then I'm happy,d1 to add you to my town circle. That us what i did with you and bats. yes bats didn't analyze vixen, but he did anslyse hts and i agreed with it, it reminded me of town bats. i generally. Make a large town circle d1, my ff read was using specific information about his play d1
Can you explain why you agree with his hts conclusion when I just explained how wrong it was?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You should also stop wasting your time trying to read slam and just try and make him interact with you about this game instead. He can actually play mafia and says insightful things.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So you don't agree with anything that's been said in regards to ninjabunnies other than that???? Have you just missed the whole discussion??
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Bats' whole case was based on a false premise - that hts was agreeing with nb but scum reading her. This was proven to not be the case at all and the majority of the nb scum read is contradictions. So bats comes in and posts something verifiably false that you AGREE with and call him town for making but then don't even flinch when it was proven to be the opposite and not actually real and instead throwing crap onto hts baselessly.
Ok bro
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:41 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:36 Holyflare wrote:
So you don't agree with anything that's been said in regards to ninjabunnies other than that???? Have you just missed the whole discussion?? Have to agree with someone to read them town? All xmas happy children are right all the time, so says the holy one.
When the person states that their town read is for agreeing then yes. Thanks for bringing useful discussion!
That us what i did with you and bats.
yes bats didn't analyze vixen, but he did anslyse hts and i agreed with it, it reminded me of town bats.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
My point is he pushed verifiably false information that anyone even paying attention to what people write would stop and say wtf that isn't right.
As did damd, myself etc etc. The real point is your TOWN read on something that shouldn't be a town read at all.
I'm going to stop wasting posts on this now because I've said what's needed to be said and I'm halfway through my post count already.....
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:21 Holyflare wrote:On December 09 2014 10:10 batsnacks wrote:On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. Agreeing with you and nb simultaneously about what froggy said is a contradiction, especially considering that what nb said about froggy was a contradiction in itself. I think HTS is scummy for that. She doesn't agree with nb. Nb says thay people that talk about policy are scummy usually and then says that HE isn't scummy but instead an easy scum read to jump on (implying mislynch) and tries to stop that pressure which is 2 contradictory statements. She's contradictory. Hts just explains his posts meaning and says it's null but scum reads bunnies for what I said. Don't see how they are the same at all. True that ##unvote
##vote: 27ninjabunnies
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Enough said dude. Why aren't you voting anyone?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 11:24 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 11:20 rsoultin wrote:On December 09 2014 11:17 GlowingBear wrote:
What is nl? No likey? Glowthebear. Slam and bats always town, or just special today? Dazzle me with glowing logic. Uhm, I've never called them town? I've called bats scum and slam only reveals himself as scum at later days . You won't have a read on him day one.Bats is scum for that wasted post on my entrance. Pointless and wishy washy (hey this guy is calling himself scum! Or color blind? Oh nevermind, SUDDEN REALISATION, BB code says blue) Slam, you're scum because you haven't post any insights yet. Defend thyself.
Huuuuh?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Nothing about bunnies obi? Kelsier?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Please nobody else out their roles. The other vt is to stop mafia being op because they can have some vt killing gun like last palmar game
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Stop claiming for the love of fucking god. If mafia can only shoot non named vt's and all the named vt's are starting to out then who do you think is left to shoot???
Named vt is literally only there to stop mafia getting easy kills.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Well I don't really want to give input into the validity of the claims other than I think damdred and sicklucker are town. Damdred for more reasons throughout the game. Sicklucker for his posts on the presents (I have no idea how he'd be mafia from them kita).
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
(he never said his present would kill anyone kita)
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 12:13 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 12:11 Holyflare wrote:
(he never said his present would kill anyone kita) He claims that his joy role gives out presents. OP states that joy role does not, hence the lie. I'm asking if its one of those silly town lies that he thinks is doing good or if he has the mafia's present and is trying to benefit the cred of a fake claim.
I don't think mafia would gain anything at all by outing that they have a present?? So yes towny.
Can you sort of go into more detail about bunnies plz because you kind of talk about points that aren't the points people are scum reading her for
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Seriously apprehensive about all these Holyflare 100% town reads after having "never trust hf again" every mafia game I play
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Dat guilt though 
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You should hop on bunnies after reading my filter and be led to great victory
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
