On December 16 2014 09:53 rsoultin wrote: 1. I've addressed GBs case on HF in-thread. 2. Not sure how I've been less than committal on you and GB. The burden of proof is on you, because I think my "commitment" has been rather obvious. 3. I said right in my Xata read that I'm not necessarily reading him as scum, just that his play is very cautious and that raised doubts. 4. I have since apologized to Tube, and even explained what I thought and where I've gone wrong with my read on SL. Not to mention I said earlier that it was meta and he was the only one I was comfortable meta-reading.
So clearly you do need to go through my filter or read the thread yourself.
He is saying that although you are scumreading us you aren't trying to convince people that we are scum. This is you being non committal.
Now that is quite hilarious. No worries, GB. If I haven't been coming at you enough already, you'll get your wish.
You don't get it. You are pushing me. You are asking me questions. You are inquiring me. But you're making nothing with it. You're voting me? Awesome. You can't lynch me with only your vote. Youre not trying to convince others to place their votes on me. You see, you're the only one voting me. You aren't trying to get others voting me.
So you may be trying to look committal, but you aren't, because you aren't really trying to get me lynched.
On December 16 2014 09:57 GlowingBear wrote: Also, rsoultin, although I've asked about what you think of xata, you've made a HUGE post on him just to say you find him null.
But you still voted him at the end of day1
Of course you tried to say that "earlier" was "day2", but I find hard to believe you turned a scumread into an easily sheep able player.
I could quote my earlier post and bold the salient portions, like when I said I was trying to get him to explain his read on 27nb, and that his comments are based in logic which appeals to my need for things to make sense.
However, I won't. I'm not getting into an argument with you over minor details in a read on Xata when I have your case to build.
A pressure vote is never stuck in a final vote count. Never. This argument of yours is invalid.
Can you quote a post of his where do you think it's sheep able, where there is this solid logic you're saying?
On December 16 2014 10:36 Holyflare wrote: I've gone through fluctuations with ritoky the most tbh. Like scummy as fuck for the bs meta case to not really scummy for claiming the present but also scummy for claiming the present and then he actually saw your case on me was bad and hammered mafia so i thought he may have actually just been retarded town again and then he claimed mafia and replaced froggy who was the weakest of my reads.
All the other ones have good reasons to be scum and froggy was just afk and agreeing with your case.
My problem here is that his entrance was bad and he didn't step up after. He admits that when we don't have a good read it is okay to lynch lurkers. Then, a huge wagon was on bunnies, so: a) he either believes bunnies is mafia or b) has no idea and tries to lynch a lurker.
On December 12 2014 22:50 froggynoddy wrote: [Am reading through the thread and responding to what I see - hence disjointed structure]
I don't like the ritocky vote. When the NB wagon was going he was the only one to really try and pressure two other players. This feels town to me (as NB flipped town herself). Declaring he was opening the present is stupid, not scummy (as far as I understand the mechanic of preseent opening.
On December 12 2014 08:58 GlowingBear wrote: Who was masoned with kita?
Time to claim.
This has already been answered in the thread. I don't like that you are asking this straight up. I personally think its way too early to role claim. We need to lynch properly and then consider day 3.
--------------------------------------------
The templar is definitely scum. All his posts so far have been sensible yet have given nothing of value. He has not pushed or. Oats would also be a good lynch but would prefer templar.
On December 12 2014 22:50 froggynoddy wrote: [Am reading through the thread and responding to what I see - hence disjointed structure]
I don't like the ritocky vote. When the NB wagon was going he was the only one to really try and pressure two other players. This feels town to me (as NB flipped town herself). Declaring he was opening the present is stupid, not scummy (as far as I understand the mechanic of preseent opening.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 08:58 GlowingBear wrote: Who was masoned with kita?
Time to claim.
This has already been answered in the thread. I don't like that you are asking this straight up. I personally think its way too early to role claim. We need to lynch properly and then consider day 3.
--------------------------------------------
The templar is definitely scum. All his posts so far have been sensible yet have given nothing of value. He has not pushed or. Oats would also be a good lynch but would prefer templar.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 11:05 sicklucker wrote:
On December 12 2014 10:37 Tubesock wrote:
On December 12 2014 09:53 Alakaslam wrote:
##kelsierSC
Yes
YES.
He is of the 5.
Holy slip batman!
##Vote: Tubesock
Like, this thing here. He says Templar is definetely mafia but bad up voting Tubesock.
I can't understand town mindset behind this
Man he says he agrees with your case but then questions you about how inconsistent doesn't = scummy when that's the whole premise of your case. I mean like mehhh. He doesn't end up voting for me which is a ++++ though his vote is very wasted.
On December 12 2014 22:50 froggynoddy wrote: [Am reading through the thread and responding to what I see - hence disjointed structure]
I don't like the ritocky vote. When the NB wagon was going he was the only one to really try and pressure two other players. This feels town to me (as NB flipped town herself). Declaring he was opening the present is stupid, not scummy (as far as I understand the mechanic of preseent opening.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 08:58 GlowingBear wrote: Who was masoned with kita?
Time to claim.
This has already been answered in the thread. I don't like that you are asking this straight up. I personally think its way too early to role claim. We need to lynch properly and then consider day 3.
--------------------------------------------
The templar is definitely scum. All his posts so far have been sensible yet have given nothing of value. He has not pushed or. Oats would also be a good lynch but would prefer templar.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 11:05 sicklucker wrote:
On December 12 2014 10:37 Tubesock wrote:
On December 12 2014 09:53 Alakaslam wrote:
##kelsierSC
Yes
YES.
He is of the 5.
Holy slip batman!
##Vote: Tubesock
Like, this thing here. He says Templar is definetely mafia but bad up voting Tubesock.
I can't understand town mindset behind this
Man he says he agrees with your case but then questions you about how inconsistent doesn't = scummy when that's the whole premise of your case. I mean like mehhh. He doesn't end up voting for me which is a ++++ though his vote is very wasted.
Yeah.
I'll vote him if you also vote
Over someone that practically claimed mafia.....???
On December 12 2014 22:50 froggynoddy wrote: [Am reading through the thread and responding to what I see - hence disjointed structure]
I don't like the ritocky vote. When the NB wagon was going he was the only one to really try and pressure two other players. This feels town to me (as NB flipped town herself). Declaring he was opening the present is stupid, not scummy (as far as I understand the mechanic of preseent opening.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 08:58 GlowingBear wrote: Who was masoned with kita?
Time to claim.
This has already been answered in the thread. I don't like that you are asking this straight up. I personally think its way too early to role claim. We need to lynch properly and then consider day 3.
--------------------------------------------
The templar is definitely scum. All his posts so far have been sensible yet have given nothing of value. He has not pushed or. Oats would also be a good lynch but would prefer templar.
--------------------------------------------
On December 12 2014 11:05 sicklucker wrote:
On December 12 2014 10:37 Tubesock wrote:
On December 12 2014 09:53 Alakaslam wrote:
##kelsierSC
Yes
YES.
He is of the 5.
Holy slip batman!
##Vote: Tubesock
Like, this thing here. He says Templar is definetely mafia but bad up voting Tubesock.
I can't understand town mindset behind this
Man he says he agrees with your case but then questions you about how inconsistent doesn't = scummy when that's the whole premise of your case. I mean like mehhh. He doesn't end up voting for me which is a ++++ though his vote is very wasted.
Yeah.
I'll vote him if you also vote
Over someone that practically claimed mafia.....???
On December 16 2014 22:37 rsoultin wrote: Care to comment on any of the points on my case on you GB? If not ritoky, I will be voting you as it stands, for the reasons mentioned in the case.
I haven't read it because, as I know I'm town, any points brought against me are automatically wrong.
Anyway, is there something in there you think an explanation would be good?
On December 17 2014 00:29 sicklucker wrote: Post where are veg scum read lone meow? Anyway wont be here for vote dont do anything dumb like vote out gb today plz
I've completely flipped my read on you. You'd better get me lynched.
EPT
