TL Mafia LXIX: Carol Of The Bells - Page 12

On December 19 2014 08:17 The_Templar wrote:

Ok. I am mad at you

On December 19 2014 09:43 rsoultin wrote:


LS, I appreciate the vote of confidence, but assuming that you're town, the only one (barring being a caroler or something) that you can know is 100% town is you. So please, never follow me blindly. That's why I make cases. I can be wrong. If you agree with it, that's fine. More the merrier.

I also will not necessarily stay on GB forever if it means sacrificing a player who I think is town. I'm not quite that stubborn, and I don't think that Templar is the worst lynch we could make. I still need to fact check HFs case, though, and see what else I can find...if I agree with it or not.

And yes, GB. You probably should read my case against you. -shrugs- That's just common sense.

On December 19 2014 09:52 rsoultin wrote:
I haven't townread Templar yet -shrugs- I already gave two reasons he makes me itchy, but I haven't done the research or checked HFs case closely enough to decide if I think it's enough to be scum or just null.

Obviously lynching someone I think is town would be the worst lynch. Why do you ask questions with obvious answers?

Also, has anyone notice that Tube hasn't posted at all in 2 days? I don't know if it was being rattled that his conspiracy theory wasn't completely right or what, but...he posted once after the flip and hasn't since.

On December 20 2014 03:05 GlowingBear wrote:
My god.
You can't understand what I say.

I'm... Amazed.

I can't be bothered to explain it once more.

Voting on whoever you want to. I'll flip town. I'm and elf. Probably the only fucking elf in the game

On December 20 2014 05:20 Tubesock wrote:
I'm here.

I have no problem voting HF or Templar. I don't think Templar has done anything towny. I think HF is mafia's ringleader still, and needs to flip one way or the other. We lynch Templar today, then I think we will spend the next three days arguing about HF and GB. If we lynch either HF or GB, then we will probably spend like 10 posts on lynching Templar. It doesn't sound like many people are towning him.

I don't understand why HF will argue for so long with Sicklucker if it isn't to set something up. HF said something like "Fine, I sent my present. Happy Birthday." And the donkey that I am thought he was talking to me since TL changed my icon to happy birthday. So, I thought it was a set up. Anyway, I don't really understand why HF won't say who he was talking to, but I also don't think it matters.

I still think HF, Sick, and Templar are scum. GlowingBear is looking scummier too, but I'm not quite willing to vote him yet over those other three.

Also, why do people think that everytime someone says "I'm sending a present" they are telling the truth? I don't think Sicklucker had a present to give Damdred. IT was just a nice cover to execute him.

On December 20 2014 05:38 rsoultin wrote:


There were 5 night kills.
We know there was 1 vig (OWS)
We know there were 2 scum with extra KSs (KSC-Branch Manager and ritoky MassMurderer)
We know that after these 2 died, mafia still had their 2 auto KPs.

That accounts for the 5 night kills
No one had to die to a present

xP Sorry Tube, no, I don't know that's what happened, but there's hardly a reason for scum not to try to get shots off on the first night, so it's likely that the ones with extra KSs did make kills.

On December 20 2014 05:54 Half the Sky wrote:


Alternative theory sans present:

1 Kush killed by Marley (if he exists, he has not flipped)
2 2x KP - scum factional kills (Koshi/Kita and/or Damdred)
3 Vigilante kills LM (retraced)
4 Mass murderer kills the third of either Koshi, Kita or Damdred

This is possible, no?

On December 20 2014 05:42 Fecalfeast wrote:
So that was a question for tubesack. Thanks gb and rsoultin... I wasn't asking because I can't figure it out.

On December 20 2014 05:33 Tubesock wrote:


I can't. I also don't think anyone can. It would require knowing the set up which is something none of us do with the exception of mafia.

It just seems awfully strange to me that people don't take into account that people can lie about sending/giving/receiving presents. None of it can be verified in anyway. Every bit of it is WIFOM.

On December 20 2014 06:06 Tubesock wrote:


And each has different scenarios. How does that go against my argument that we can not possibly know?

On December 20 2014 07:02 Half the Sky wrote:
Rasputin, HF said he wouldn't be around for EoD.