EPTBut look at the post that you are slightly town reading sky for, hes not defending you at all hes look at motives for bresh slightly without any real pressure. Half of it won't get any answer and then he discredits himself with the last sentence slightly . So not sur ei'm seeing what you are unless you are just looking to give people town reads for no reason
Student Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
But look at the post that you are slightly town reading sky for, hes not defending you at all hes look at motives for bresh slightly without any real pressure. Half of it won't get any answer and then he discredits himself with the last sentence slightly . So not sur ei'm seeing what you are unless you are just looking to give people town reads for no reason | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:27 meatpudding wrote: Student mafia, eh.... Did you know? Sperm whales have the largest brain of any animal. Cool stuff what do you think of the couple things that have been posted so far | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:20 sicklucker wrote: imo day ones are stupid. I never take too much info out of day one but I do try to get some and start the game rolling I try to take charge as town. Im certainly not going to vote breske because of it , this is the kind of thing you look back at when you have more information. Kind of agree with your day one idea. Not to say that it's stupid, but it takes some time to make a decent read. On November 25 2014 08:21 sicklucker wrote: This is pretty townie. This got me at least one slight town read Anyone could have said this. It's not uncommon to have a policy lynch on lurkers. I don't know why you would come out and say that it looks town. Unless you're going to say that it's a meta-play and you're trying to judge Breshke on his reaction to you saying he's town, but then you could say that everything is a play and you wouldn't have to be held to anything you said. Anyway on the topic of policy, I wouldn't necessarily lynch all lurkers on day 1. Only if there was no reasonable candidate scum lynch. | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:36 Damdred wrote: Cool stuff what do you think of the couple things that have been posted so far I have my eye on sicklucker. Not really sure what he's up to but I expect he's fishing for reads. I would like to see what he comes up with by end of day. Otherwise I'm marking it as suspicious. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:41 meatpudding wrote: I have my eye on sicklucker. Not really sure what he's up to but I expect he's fishing for reads. I would like to see what he comes up with by end of day. Otherwise I'm marking it as suspicious. I know its not much posted so far but is there anyone else you are looking at or hinking about? On November 25 2014 08:39 meatpudding wrote: Kind of agree with your day one idea. Not to say that it's stupid, but it takes some time to make a decent read. Anyone could have said this. It's not uncommon to have a policy lynch on lurkers. I don't know why you would come out and say that it looks town. Unless you're going to say that it's a meta-play and you're trying to judge Breshke on his reaction to you saying he's town, but then you could say that everything is a play and you wouldn't have to be held to anything you said. Anyway on the topic of policy, I wouldn't necessarily lynch all lurkers on day 1. Only if there was no reasonable candidate scum lynch. Could you alk more about the bolded and where lurker lynch/policy lynch came from. | ||
|
Dicksmash McIroncock
135 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:31 sicklucker wrote: I like that your interrogating me but thats enough to give me a small read. Yes mafia can pocket me but its very unlikely when you get a town voted in the first five minutes, you dont go hey guys are we kinda jumping the gun a bit here? wouldn't mafia go out of their way to look towny if they were being ballsy enough to vote in the first 5 minutes of the game? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
The point is the guys who played with me last game know I make quick reads. But do they think that about breske? Im kind of curious because im not so sure he does. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:50 sicklucker wrote: I agree my read was a little weak. I still dont think its something a mafia would say. Me jumping to quick reads is nothing new when I subbed into the last game on day two my first post was calling breske scummy and someone else town. The town read was right, the breske read was wrong but even he said his vote was super scummy for getting the cop killed. The point is the guys who played with me last game know I make quick reads. But do they think that about breske? Im kind of curious because im not so sure he does. Im still not entirely sure what you got out of your "play" but i wouldn't really say i was making a quick read. You said you were going afk, as either allighnment this isnt good because it means i couldn't get a read off you. Im not sure who the question about me making quick reads is directed at but tell me, if i normally dont make quick reads what do you think of my allighnment? Same as if i do. I don't see where your questions are leading to. ##Unvote | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
Regarding my post, I wasn't siding with anybody. Day 1, I feel it is too quick to accuse someone, so I was calling into question Breshke's vote approx 30 mins into Day 1, as it was pretty quick and I had made an incorrect assumption on sicklucker's experience with TLM, to which I thought Breshke's rationale (in his second post) made sense. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On November 25 2014 07:26 Half the Sky wrote: Are you voting him down because he's serious and just trolling or because you're a baddie trying to lynch a good guy? Granted this is my first ever TLM game so you probably know this lad more than I do...just saying. I can read that either way. So i also thought this post was towny but for different reasons than SL said. The first time I read this i liked it because he was thinking about alignments like trying to work out what i was trying to do but on reread he doesn't think it was a possibility that i was voting SL because i thought he was mafia. Leaning town a little bit but mostly null. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
And since you are so good at reading breske give me a preliminary read (especially since you are fond of fast reads) | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On November 25 2014 09:06 sicklucker wrote: Breske knows im super active and push the thread. I expect him to give me more time since he should be able to read me better then anyone else in this game since hes played the most with me. I also think ill read him better then most people here so I wont pass judgement. What if i decide to play completely different to last game? I don't think one games experience is enough to have a good read on someone at least im not going to claim that on you. | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On November 25 2014 08:48 Damdred wrote: I know its not much posted so far but is there anyone else you are looking at or hinking about? Not really. Breshke and HtS look like they're trying to reason their way through the game. You're asking lots of questions which is good. Not enough info for me to put you on by bang list. Could you alk more about the bolded and where lurker lynch/policy lynch came from. Maybe I could explain the bolded part a bit better. sicklucker opens by saying he's going to afk. I guess he was fishing for a reaction from someone and Breshke jumps in and votes, because an afk town is essentially useless. (Though I would usually let the modkill go through). Now sicklucker isn't playing afk at all, he seems to be poking and fishing around for responses. Could be ok, or could be suspicious. I think it was way too early to give a town read for that just based on Breshke's response. Really easy for anyone to make that call. Now, since sicklucker backflipped on the afk deal, maybe he is just saying Breshke is town, and fishing for more info, or maybe he really is posting that as a read. If it's a genuine read, I don't really think it's justified based on that small interaction. If it's fishing, then I can't really trust any of his reads because he can use that excuse to drop false information. Actually on first read I thought he was saying that Breshke's vote was townie, but now it looks like he was saying HtS's defense was townie. Hm, maybe it's not so bad. Would like to hear whar sicklucker is really thinking now. Often in other games players have put forward a Lynch all Lurkers and Lynch all Liars policy. I don't really agree with these but I was wondering if anyone else follows policy votes. Also in other games we have posted our reads in Marry/Bang/Kill format. I'll be doing that once some more people have posted. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 25 2014 09:08 Damdred wrote: SL tell me what you think of Half the Sky. And since you are so good at reading breske give me a preliminary read (especially since you are fond of fast reads) Like hes the only person in the game ive given a read on yet. Why do you keep asking | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On November 25 2014 09:20 sicklucker wrote: Like hes the only person in the game ive given a read on yet. Why do you keep asking Because your read is half ass'd and at one point you say that he defends you when he never does and in almost his very next post he says "Oh nvm i'll vote him and keep my eye on him" basically. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 25 2014 09:09 Breshke wrote: What if i decide to play completely different to last game? I don't think one games experience is enough to have a good read on someone at least im not going to claim that on you. I agree some but of all people I dont expect you to insta vote me. We just played for like 2 weeks you know I cant keep my mouth shut for very long. If anything I talk too much as town | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On November 25 2014 09:22 Damdred wrote: Because your read is half ass'd and at one point you say that he defends you when he never does and in almost his very next post he says "Oh nvm i'll vote him and keep my eye on him" basically. Thats bullshit Everypost I made in this entire thread was about those two players. Its like your posting to make yourself look good while adding nothing. | ||
| ||
