EPTStudent Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 26 2014 09:05 sicklucker wrote: Why? We have like the same two scum reads... I think your jumping the gun on dick is all. Hes more null to me I just liked the little ive seen because you aren't giving reasons behind any of your reads. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
DICKSMASHMCIRONCOCK Could be scum I guess: 3) rsoultin (filter) 6) LightningStrike (filter) 10) Damdred (filter) 11) alakaslam (filter) 13) Oatsmaster (filter) Longshots: 4) Trfel (filter) 7) Meatpudding (filter) Anyone want to defend dicksmash with meta or something? He is nitpicking and whiteknighting. such obvious scum play. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 26 2014 10:13 sicklucker wrote: Well Ill take my town read away I thought he was a new player but I did like him calling out damdred. How easy would it be for him to make that +1 as scum. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
batsnacks lynch aint gonna happen. neither is an oats lynch. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 26 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote: I had an early townread on dicksmash because of this post: He was the first to point this out and several other people sheeped it. how is this pointing anything out? It's making an assumption that sicklucker's "plan" was made up after the fact to save himself. There is no evidence of that, and I find it unlikely. To me it is yet another example of Dicksmash nitpicking instead of scumhunting. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 26 2014 10:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Bad townread. Anyone could post that. And again, you reference "Other people" when trying to back up your point. If other people think its good, it doesnt mean its good. hmm oats i don't agree with your "other people" point, but it is quite townie of you to pick up that detail. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Dicksmash has got to go. His recent scumreads are really unconvincing and the reasoning he uses is generic and superficial. VOTE DICKSMASH PEOPLE. Batsnacks is way too active to lynch d1. The truth is that it's rare that someone is going to have strong reads d1, so you can't fault batsnacks for that. He has been promoting discussion and had a huge presence in the thread. You don't ever lynch someone like that d1. Oats, you should know that. And that's what makes me worry about you. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
What do I mean? I mean that he is going to be a big unknown all game due to his lack of activity and not giving a fuck. Unlike someone like bats or oats, who can prove themselves town later in the game. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 27 2014 02:03 Half the Sky wrote: DSMI voters - I understand the policy vote arguments, and for the most part, I'm okay with that, because he and Alakaslam had about the same post count with minimal substance going into last night. I can accept that argument. The Day 1 argument, okay, I can also give someone that too...however... I'm looking at his post-page 18 activity and he has been putting out some substance though it could be supported better. He did have a bandwagon bats vote... ...but if you are looking to policy vote ANYONE at this point, you guys should be going after Alakaslam, not DSMI. After page 18, DSMI isn't a policy vote in my book. Fair point, but can you (or anyone) distinguish between him and Alakaslam? The keyword is DOUBLES. As in he's a good scumlynch as well as plynch. Alaka would be a better pure plynch sure, but Dicksmash has scummy content as well. Dicksmash shows a need to survive. Earlier he came into the thread and tried to give some content. On November 26 2014 12:48 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote: My mistake. It was page 10 when you first called HTS town but a couple posts later put him up as your scumread. SL wrant from null to scum as well. Though reading through bats filter I can see that of everyone he's made and effort to not post reads or reasoning for votes so for today my vote stand on him ## vote bats This reasoning is generic bullshit. He's voting batsnacks for 1 fluidity of reads - which is common d1 2 not posting reads or reasoning - which other people have been worse about, plus is not even really true His batsnacks vote is bullshit. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 28 2014 10:35 sicklucker wrote: Kush is a possible partner. Kush loves randomly busing his team mates from what ive seen. Um how have a bussed bats? ive been defending him. In fact my day 2 scumreads will likely be completely different from my d1 scumreads. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On November 28 2014 07:11 Half the Sky wrote: Did we seriously just lose both power roles in the first 36h? (INSERT EXPLETIVES HERE.) Looks like the scum are running scared, and there's a reason for that. I just cannot believe how unlucky we have been though. Unbelievable. More filter diving to come... why are "the scum running scared"? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||
