|
|
|
|
|
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is.
does it come with a side of fries?
|
On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is.
![[image loading]](http://www.alanzosblog.com/wp-content/uploads/skeptical-baby.jpg)
|
On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem?
well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself.
|
On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky?
you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite.
and nope.
|
On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first.
claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is.
you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours.
|
On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit.
nvm i rescind on VE this seems like an overreaction
|
On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky?
and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted.
|
On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:[quote] [quote] Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted?
On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit.
bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide.
|
On November 20 2014 15:50 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:[quote] [quote] Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Good deal. Now that that's cleared up what do YOU think of Chez and fecal?
no opinion as of now, they just posted a bunch of pictures. maybe fecal is a bit melodramatic, but that's really it.
|
On November 20 2014 15:53 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:
[quote]
well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide. He took an already shaky premise and twisted the word "we" into a scumread. That is fucking ludicrous and I will not stand for it.
then advance the game in a more positive direction rather than just sitting there whining about it and being defensive?
|
On November 20 2014 16:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Holyflare is weird.
oh how vague of you.
![[image loading]](http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131008181448/p__/protagonist/images/3/3c/Mallory_being_skeptical.png)
|
On November 20 2014 16:25 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 16:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 16:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Holyflare is weird. oh how vague of you.  This was clearly not MSPaint
surprised by you VE, usually you all over people when they use vague and non-descript words. why you not on rayn for saying HF weird?
|
On November 20 2014 16:30 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 16:28 Holyflare wrote:On November 20 2014 16:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
I will literally vote no one else today. And if he DOESN'T get lynched, then I'm fucking killing him in the night unless I'm roleblocked. Get fucking rekt. Only mafia would shoot me in the night. This is the second super jump on whatever you can and think you're obnoxiously right that you've done in 2 hours though which is pretty scummy VE most commonly claims Vig.
slam most commonly claims HJOLE
|
On November 20 2014 18:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:If you mean templar's post no it's not.
but he described someone as weird, so you should like him right? RIGHT?
![[image loading]](http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/10/b9/79/10b979b84d468c36a5fb6ba4eae3c443.jpg)
|
On November 20 2014 18:22 liancourt wrote:
someone gimme a summary on whats happened so far
VE had fisticuffs with everyone he came across it looked similar to this:
![[image loading]](http://i1317.photobucket.com/albums/t622/Rainbowkittenism/D3PCBTTL3_zps57fe5af5.png)
|
On November 20 2014 18:28 Holyflare wrote:
so liancourt you haven't read anything and want a summary but you are voting me?
he claimed mafia, so why wouldn't he?
|
On November 20 2014 16:01 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:56 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:53 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:
[quote]
you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite.
and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide. He took an already shaky premise and twisted the word "we" into a scumread. That is fucking ludicrous and I will not stand for it. then advance the game in a more positive direction rather than just sitting there whining about it and being defensive? that falls in the OMGUS VE category.
forgot about this post cuz i got into a league game, but if this dude is town, then why does he care if he appears to be OMGUSing VE? if he has a scum read on VE then he has one and should push it. dun like.
|
On November 20 2014 18:33 liancourt wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lT0oRUR.png)
dat color scheme doe
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.gyazo.com/6fa575943a89a255eadf2117b6892640.png)
