|
On November 20 2014 15:21 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? Is that going to help you get a read on Chez?
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. I think you are overjustifying way too hard.
It's one observation. How can ONE observation about ONE thing you've done be "overjustification"? That's complete nonsense LMAO
|
On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. ![[image loading]](http://www.alanzosblog.com/wp-content/uploads/skeptical-baby.jpg) Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself.
You didn't answer the question.
Are you mafia ritoky?
|
On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope.
I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play.
There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first.
|
On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit.
It's the first hour of the first day of the first day phase Hopeless. Calm down.
Like, if you want to change my mind there's plenty of time. Feel free to comment on anything or anyone. Even me, if you think I'm mafia or whatever. But for the record, my accusation is this:
Contentless Throwaway posts to appear contributory>Mafia
That's grounds to me for now man. You can't say I don't have grounds, it's literally the first thing anyone has said about anyone. It's THE ground man. Because everything anyone else says BUILDS on THAT THING I JUST SAID.
|
On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours.
This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky?
|
On November 20 2014 15:49 Fecalfeast wrote:wait wwhat ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/K4HWlJ1.png)
GOTCHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GOTEM BOYS!!!!
|
On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted.
Good deal. Now that that's cleared up what do YOU think of Chez and fecal?
|
On November 20 2014 15:49 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/zMfSPvb.png)
OMG IS THAT ME?!?!
CHEZ IS THAT ME?!?!?!?!?!?!
|
On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
[quote]
Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide.
It's really not that shaky, and if he's mafia I'll thank you to acknowledge that fact once I explain why in postgame.
|
On November 20 2014 15:54 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:50 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
[quote]
Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Good deal. Now that that's cleared up what do YOU think of Chez and fecal? no opinion as of now, they just posted a bunch of pictures. maybe fecal is a bit melodramatic, but that's really it.
Well I mean Chez has voted for Hopeless...and presumably for a reason because he linked Hopeless' filter. He may or may not share what his reason is, but I think that comes from town Chez.
|
Chez drew a picture of me <3
Chez top town FOR LIFE!!!!!!
|
On November 20 2014 16:01 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:56 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:53 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:
[quote]
you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite.
and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide. He took an already shaky premise and twisted the word "we" into a scumread. That is fucking ludicrous and I will not stand for it. then advance the game in a more positive direction rather than just sitting there whining about it and being defensive? that falls in the OMGUS VE category.
But you don't think I'm mafia Hopeless, and if you do that PROVES you're mafia. Because you're a good player and you know that this is how I play as town. As mafia I'm totally different, I lurk hard, and I come in with big posts and then play defense. That's my style, and that's how I win. OR lose.
|
Post 100 in this quicktopic proves that Hopeless CAN NOT think I'm mafia here for thinking he's mafia because he's seen me play this game THIS WAY RECENTLY. It's true that the circumstances are a little different, I had replaced into that game and there was a lot of stuff to draw from in the thread - the salient point though is that I found a mafia for what may SEEM to be shaky reasoning IMMEDIATELY and pushed on it hard against one of the louder voices in the thread. IMMEDIATELY.
He knows this is how I play as town, and now he would have you believe that he thinks I'm mafia. Don't believe his lies.
|
On November 20 2014 16:15 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 16:09 VisceraEyes wrote:Post 100 in this quicktopic proves that Hopeless CAN NOT think I'm mafia here for thinking he's mafia because he's seen me play this game THIS WAY RECENTLY. It's true that the circumstances are a little different, I had replaced into that game and there was a lot of stuff to draw from in the thread - the salient point though is that I found a mafia for what may SEEM to be shaky reasoning IMMEDIATELY and pushed on it hard against one of the louder voices in the thread. IMMEDIATELY. He knows this is how I play as town, and now he would have you believe that he thinks I'm mafia. Don't believe his lies. Um no because if he is town and you are doing this then it doesn't count as "I've never seen him play so well" because you would be attacking him as town.
So do you think he's town HF? Actually, don't care.
|
|
|
I will literally vote no one else today. And if he DOESN'T get lynched, then I'm fucking killing him in the night unless I'm roleblocked. Get fucking rekt.
|
|
|
On November 20 2014 16:28 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 16:25 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 16:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 16:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Holyflare is weird. oh how vague of you. ![[image loading]](http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131008181448/p__/protagonist/images/3/3c/Mallory_being_skeptical.png)  This was clearly not MSPaint surprised by you VE, usually you all over people when they use vague and non-descript words. why you not on rayn for saying HF weird?
Because he's right, HF is weird. And he's mafia and he's going to fucking die. I would be more concerned if he used a positive vague word like "snappy" or "happenin".
Is this another "gotcha" moment or something?
|
On November 20 2014 16:28 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 16:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
I will literally vote no one else today. And if he DOESN'T get lynched, then I'm fucking killing him in the night unless I'm roleblocked. Get fucking rekt. Only mafia would shoot me in the night. This is the second super jump on whatever you can and think you're obnoxiously right that you've done in 2 hours though which is pretty scummy
This is false because I'm town and I'm ABSOLUTELY shooting you in the night if you're not lynched.
Further, there's nothing scummy about me making an observation about someone and thinking I'm right about it. It's not even "pretty" scummy, it's literally not scummy at all.
|
On November 20 2014 16:38 Alakaslam wrote:
VE what about hopeless1der
He's probably still mafia. But HF first. Because he's a danger to town. Hopeless is just a danger of being annoyingly defensive. HF will lead you into oblivion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vcVjn4e.png?2)
EPT
