|
i just copy pasted my notes its not like i spent any considerable amount of time i answered a question posed to me in the best manner I could. Nobody asked me about my reads in general they asked about one specific person and why i read him that way so i showed it, so don't paint me for that.
Look at the other reasons people are giving for voting for people, not contributing, approaching badly etc.. So stop attacking me for not having a huge case on people doing nothing basically all day, gb admits to being super lazy and just fuck everyone else. And its not null tells gb its your scum tells.
Oats you have no room to talk buddy
|
On November 01 2014 23:45 jrkirby wrote:Ok Slam. So if I was a dumb idiot and that post I quoted was sarcasm, then back it up. What's your evidence that RNG is more likely to hit scum than day 1 non-RNG lynch? I'll happily follow any strategy that has the best chance of hitting scum. Give me evidence that RNG is the best, and I'll resume that strategy. Also, if you believe in RNG, why the hell isn't your vote on GlowingBear. Just saying "Oh, it was all a joke" isn't going to cut it. You need to back up your claims on one side or the other. You still don't get it.
You must not know BH.
BH has no qualms with making blatantly false claims to line up with his policies. Notice I did not vote GlowingBear despite BlazingHand data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef8c/fef8cdefdb0b94e66d814f30c54f6722574952ed" alt=""
Many times it has been claimed by He That Is Great that RNG is better than analysis day 1.
However, Kita once came into the thread and pointed out that one time he claimed this it was actually untrue; town had done exceptionally well for d1 analysis for a bit and beat RNG entirely.
So, since it landed on GlowingBear (lol) then I think levity is an understandable response.
However GB's response wasn't the best XD
Anyway, you somehow think I honestly advocated what I did not follow up with my vote or push with any sort of strength. In fact all I have pushed for at this point really is JayBrundage analyze by the cat,
And I have even joked about that.
(Puts on a bowler hat
And gets in a Cadillac)
|
PFFT Seuss ninja, and I need not apply
|
Since I'm not actually going anywhere, wazzaaaaaaaaaap
|
On November 01 2014 08:20 Damdred wrote: Sure I'm thinking you could very well be scum right now.
I have a town read on hf, oats, jay right now as well as loan.
misar is a scum lean
So you're saying you have no other notes other than jay? What about these others?
|
Like, you said you copy pasted your notes. Can you immediately copy paste your other notes?
|
I could if I wanted to,
i've already said why i think your scum so theres that.
|
On November 02 2014 01:36 Damdred wrote: I could if I wanted to,
i've already said why i think your scum so theres that.
I thought so.
##Vote: Damdred
|
Your still being lazy and scummy gb, why not make a case instead of being lazzy?
|
We are killing Damdred today
Place your votes right now!
|
On November 02 2014 01:39 Damdred wrote: Your still being lazy and scummy gb, why not make a case instead of being lazzy?
Trying to discredit me isn't going to work now, damdy. Anyone who reads my filter will see that I gave reads plenty of times. I even said that, by BH's meta, I thought he was scum.
|
^ which means I searched for him on the database = effort
|
no thats not effort at all, you haven't expounded on anything you just have the looks of someone giving effort mos of your filter is just fluff. Anything people have looked at you hard you have dropped it pretty fast, oats and you rinteraction early is a good indication of that.
|
|
|
Though theres something in jrkirbys filter that bothers me more than you are right now gb
|
Quoting the LT post with "content" + Show Spoiler +On November 01 2014 16:54 Lord Tolkien wrote: alright, back from long series of cancer inhouses
wheeeeeeee~
I'm tired and actually want to sleep, but I SUPPOSE I should help lead town to victory.
...when I'm not about to pass out.
First,
I really want to analyze JB. But whatever town wants, I guess. I'll consolidate because I'm a conformist and not mafia trying to waste muh votes.
Two,
Misder, I find it very enlightening to see how people reacted to my blatant trolling. Very enlightening indeed. It's how I garner early reads: looking at the wagons that always form on me D1. :D
Plus no one ever lynches me D1, so why should I be concerned.
Three,
Holyflare, VE, and GlowingBear are probably town. Compare the cancer mafia Glowing to current Glowing. Much more wililng to take a stance and much less passive. Will peg him as town for now. Would also sort of like to say OWS is slightly leaning town, but much less to go on.
I've heard people say that Oats is hard to read, but idk, he's leaning town in my reading.
Everyone else are scummerdawgs, or I can't read them based on past experience. Id actually have to, like, put in effort and nitpick their filters.
Four,
as much lulz and hilarity BHs RNG lynch turned out in FFL mini-mafia, I'm not quite ready to take one on yet. At least, not when I've good a semi-decent read on Glowing. Won't vote for what I suspect is a sure mislynch.
Also again, lynching (one of?) the most active player is lelelelel
Five,
Zzzzz, Giving risk.nuke some time to do his IRL shit. But if he dont post D2, we post lynch him then. If we lurker lynch someone, we should totes lynch Monte Seuss lel.
jrkirby: who are you mafia reads? You made it clear that I'm only your vote because you want me to post stuff and not troll.
I'll post moar, but can't promise not trolling on occasion. But in any event, you've given no real stance on possible mafia, instead sheeping onto a silly RNG vote.
I'll be awake sometime before ~12PM EDT to carry town to victoryyyyyyy.
For now,
#Vote Seuss
But i'll consolidate when the time cums First Everyone and their mum wants to analyze me nothing new here. Second You say its "Very enlightening indeed." How people react to your trolling. Classic cop out. And seeing as I have been reacting strongly against your "trolling" I would think you would have something insightful to comment about me.
You put a throw away vote on Seuss. Directly under that you state your intention to sheep towards the end of the day. Going further then that you recant your vote on Seuss after you see him post.
After 20 or so shit posts I'm not impressed.
Your only redeeming factor is that BH has done less then you. Which is rather damning for BH. And who I am rather disappointed in.
|
So I was reading over jrkirbys filter.
And whats bothering me is all of the votes near the end of his filter. His filter feels a lot like hes trying to find a safe spot to put a vote on and is jumping around a lot. Generally town might pressure with a vote but they don't jump around like hes doing looking for the easiest target to land on to see if he can get support.
I'll try to make a case on him in the next little bit a bit more comprehensive.
|
Jay, we are voting Damdred. Place your vote
|
On November 02 2014 01:16 Damdred wrote: i just copy pasted my notes its not like i spent any considerable amount of time i answered a question posed to me in the best manner I could. Nobody asked me about my reads in general they asked about one specific person and why i read him that way so i showed it, so don't paint me for that.
Look at the other reasons people are giving for voting for people, not contributing, approaching badly etc.. So stop attacking me for not having a huge case on people doing nothing basically all day, gb admits to being super lazy and just fuck everyone else. And its not null tells gb its your scum tells.
Oats you have no room to talk buddy ohhhh noooo I have plenty of room to talk. YOU HAVE NO SCUM READS DUDE.
|
|
|
|