|
On October 25 2014 00:48 IAmRobik wrote:
I really don't and I'm not gonna make shit up. I have no need to fabricate stuff. I am telling you how I feel about the game. If you want to push for my lynch for not taking a strong stance, that's your prerogative.
I will say this, you can definitely see an evolution of reads from me.
I started off the game with a strong town read on HF, but that has since faded. I also gave a pseudo-strong scum read on GB, and I rescinded that as well as I kept reading and thinking. Even if you disagree with my conclusion regarding GBs insistence on sticking around when he could have gone to sleep, it still shows that I'm thinking about the game. I could have just as easily not said anything and just pushed a lynch on him if I were scum and he were town.
No, you aren't on my list for today. But the game could be so much easier if I knew you are town.
|
On October 25 2014 00:49 Holyflare wrote:
Also gb has completely failed at reading (hello the thing you're apparently scum reading me for but actually i haven't done) because he thinks i called fecalfeast legitimate because he doesn't read the thread he just reads filters and doesn't see that I'm talking about elvis. Jat you look terrible for sheeping this shit
Do I? Awww. Don't make me feel bad now.
I am not really sheeping that.
|
On October 25 2014 00:51 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 00:48 batsnacks wrote:
HF I don't understand why you think I'm scummy and I feel like when I try to respond to you you just make up something else like "where is your GB/rayn read???"
You're just pushing me fr the sake of pushing me 3 people have agreed with my read on you, maybe actually more. You then come in when the flavour of the thread is me looking scummy and dump a load of shit about me not mentioning ff despite scum reading 2 other people as well but fail to show why that's scummy when you have done something far worse and mentioned 2 scum reads that you haven't talked about at all ever ever ever. Pot meet kettle. You are dying today.
The flavour of the thread was not you looking scummy when batsnacks posted that.
|
Unless you want to call me calling out a few awful posts of yours the flavour of the thread.
|
On October 25 2014 00:57 Holyflare wrote:
Explain to me the awful posts so i can prove they aren't awful
Well, how about you just read what I pointed out then? It is in my Filter.
But now to something different: I might sheep slam. I just did a very lazy meta research about how big thrawns filters tend to be pagewise according to his last couple of games. He is probably mafia.
|
On October 25 2014 01:00 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 00:50 justanothertownie wrote:On October 25 2014 00:48 IAmRobik wrote:
I really don't and I'm not gonna make shit up. I have no need to fabricate stuff. I am telling you how I feel about the game. If you want to push for my lynch for not taking a strong stance, that's your prerogative.
I will say this, you can definitely see an evolution of reads from me.
I started off the game with a strong town read on HF, but that has since faded. I also gave a pseudo-strong scum read on GB, and I rescinded that as well as I kept reading and thinking. Even if you disagree with my conclusion regarding GBs insistence on sticking around when he could have gone to sleep, it still shows that I'm thinking about the game. I could have just as easily not said anything and just pushed a lynch on him if I were scum and he were town. No, you aren't on my list for today. But the game could be so much easier if I knew you are town. So like, feel free to assume I'm town because that's the correct assumption to make, but I think that you're drastically overvaluing my role this game. You're saying that knowing I'm town would make the game "so much easier." I don't think that would make the game much easier. Can you tell me what conclusions you would be able to draw from knowing I'm town? Does figuring out my role really influence how you read the game? Like say I die at night? Is the game magically going to be solved because you know my role? Meh
No, it isn't. But I wouldn't need to consider some weird connections like you and HF.
|
Does anyone here think thrawn is town and if so - why?
|
He hasn't really given any scumreads all game. Misrepresented things like this:
On October 24 2014 07:12 DrParnassus wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 06:02 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 24 2014 05:54 liancourt wrote:
Elaborate shit posting cos its better than dead thread i think. Not going to quote shit because it took me 3 tries to quote this post. I think dead thread is worse, too. If you weren't posting nonsense i would have to base my read on you being a lurker with everyone else. This is a really weird thing to say, the implication is that fecalfeast plans on calling lian scummy regardless of what liam does. ff i'll gladly vote for if that's what you actually want
And then he takes one of the only people you could actually think he is scumreading off his list again. Why? No idea.
On October 24 2014 11:04 DrParnassus wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 10:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
DrParnassus, to ask a question that makes sense, have any of your reads from your list changed significantly? You're off the list, but that's all. There's a few specific things I'm waiting for before I start pushing a case.
Thrawn shows no desire to figure this game out or to scumhunt.
|
On October 25 2014 01:14 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 13:11 Holyflare wrote:
5. Fecalfeast
6. batsnacks
13. raynpelikoneet
very tempted to add kush back on there because he came back and did absolutely nothing but reply to something irrelevant even if i did like his initial entry but i wouldn't say that's super hard to do as either alignment, at a stretch I'd add thrawn back for not being very conversational at all whatsoever and just having reads (even if they are super similar) and that's about it, his reasons for his reads were very straightforward and not very critical thinkingish... lian... i dunno i'm just not feeling him being mafia i dunno, damd has to post more for me to solidify some things
##vote batsnacks for best push today
case
super defends lian and doesn't really have any scum reads
calls out posts as super towny, towniest post etc when they aren't particularly
has a weird "push" on ff but it's not even a push or any pressure and based on super strong town read on lian which i don't think any sensible person would have at this point in time Still very much where I'm at
Cool. Why is thrawn not on that list?
|
|
|
|
|
On October 25 2014 01:58 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 01:17 justanothertownie wrote:On October 25 2014 01:14 Holyflare wrote:On October 24 2014 13:11 Holyflare wrote:
5. Fecalfeast
6. batsnacks
13. raynpelikoneet
very tempted to add kush back on there because he came back and did absolutely nothing but reply to something irrelevant even if i did like his initial entry but i wouldn't say that's super hard to do as either alignment, at a stretch I'd add thrawn back for not being very conversational at all whatsoever and just having reads (even if they are super similar) and that's about it, his reasons for his reads were very straightforward and not very critical thinkingish... lian... i dunno i'm just not feeling him being mafia i dunno, damd has to post more for me to solidify some things
##vote batsnacks for best push today
case
super defends lian and doesn't really have any scum reads
calls out posts as super towny, towniest post etc when they aren't particularly
has a weird "push" on ff but it's not even a push or any pressure and based on super strong town read on lian which i don't think any sensible person would have at this point in time Still very much where I'm at Cool. Why is thrawn not on that list? He is
Wow, I must be blind then.
|
On October 25 2014 02:14 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 02:05 liancourt wrote:
At robik.
You found me scum earlier in the game and now u think im townie what changed ur mind? WRONG.
Well, your listpost does indicate this in a way.
On October 23 2014 22:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
For the record i can't play too much tonight... or like at all.
I am travelling tomorrow from 4PM gmt +3 -> . I'll then make my bother drive so i will have 5 hours to properly focus on this.
What's up rayn? Isn't it time already?
|
I mean correct me if I am wrong but the 5 hours he was talking about are almost over, right?
|
On October 25 2014 02:37 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 23:59 GlowingBear wrote:
Here is the problem, Robik: in this game, we have 3 or 4 people lurking (if you believe thrawn is): kush, Elvis, Rayn and thrawn.
Kush promised he was going to blow the thread with towniness, but he didn't . He brought the excuse that he is busy, but he did the same last game he was scum. He also was active. He was only responding when he was cited, which means he is reading the thread but not contributing.
Elvis has 3 posts. In one, he says FF and lian looks bad for terrible, terrible reasons. He also said I and thrawn looks bad and that he was going to tell us why later, but never did.
Rayn came to the thread, said he was busy, pointed out things, threw weird town reads and leader out.
I have nothing memorable from thrawn, which is really bad for him. I have to dive him.
So, between these four , you're trying to lynch Rayn, the only guy that said he was busy. And you're trying to lynch him based mostly on inactivity.
Why not considering the others?
maybe if you idiots talked less we would talk more. did you ever think of that? all my time is keeping up with the shitty one liners you are making at each other. If you expect me to step up today, don't. Voting batsnacks atm.
To the bolded: No way.
To the rest:
##Vote: Kush
Why are there so many scummy people in this game?
|
Like FF, batsnacks, Elvis, kush, HF, rayn and thrawn can't all be scum.
|
On October 25 2014 02:42 kushm4sta wrote:
and i never promised anything this game so dont lie about me gb
This is actually true. I could have sworn you did. But that does not make your play look any better.
|
You had enough time to lurk.
On October 24 2014 19:54 kushm4sta wrote:
im not doing nothing. im lurking.
Why do you not have enough time to post some reads with even the slightest reasoning then?
|
On October 25 2014 03:02 kushm4sta wrote:
explaining d1 reads is dumb.
No it is not. If noone is explaining his reads there is no way to get a read on anyone.
|
On October 25 2014 03:05 kushm4sta wrote:
last game i said explaining reads during night phase was dumb. that is completely different.
That statement is also idiotic but less idiotic than what you said in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
