|
On October 26 2014 08:40 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 06:34 kushm4sta wrote:
@superbia, please give thoughts on rayne and alakaslam. Some fucking mindmeld shit going on here. I actually would prefer to lynch both at some point in time. Slam just posts confusing (albeit funny) shit. Rayn posts bad one-liners and WIFOM shit. Slam gets townread by some people for essentially no reason. Rayn gets townread because of his "bad reads". Gut says rayn feels somewhat more scummy than slam, but that's probably because slam is amusing. They are mainly just question marks to me, and the game would be better without them.
I always thought game would be better without scum.
|
On October 26 2014 08:43 DrParnassus wrote:
glowingbear.. your thoughts on damdred gogo
Before I begin, have in mind that damdred is always passive.
That said, he is much more passive as scum. He is much more disinterested in the game. His play in this game is looking similar to the last one. If you read his filter, does it look like he is trying to solve the game? It doesn't look like that to me. It looks like he is, again, just throwing questions but not getting conclusions from them.
So, yeah, he is scummy.
|
The problem is: I'm having the same feeling from a lot of people, which is making me uncomfortable.
|
On October 26 2014 08:23 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 08:23 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 08:20 justanothertownie wrote:
I am a bit disappointed that marv isn't posting today. If I die tonight you need to force him to be active day2. Don't just give him a pass. You're not dying tonight. Your team has obviously talked this over. Who's dying?
What are you trying to accomplish with this question?
|
On October 26 2014 09:40 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 09:37 Superbia wrote:
If I had gotten anything out of the interaction between bats and someone I would've included it in my reads. Honestly I feel like it's still pretty WIFOM at this point. The only available source of actual hard information is WIFOM to you? You did not even try to interpret the actions of anyone. Wtf dude.
Tell me what did you get from that source.
|
On October 26 2014 09:47 justanothertownie wrote:
Do you think that everything that happened leading up to the lynch is completely WIFOM GB?
Of course not. But I wanted to know what have you directly got from it.
|
On October 26 2014 10:02 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 10:01 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 09:47 justanothertownie wrote:
Do you think that everything that happened leading up to the lynch is completely WIFOM GB? Of course not. But I wanted to know what have you directly got from it. In that case you should read the game. Or if you are the forgetful type my filter.
JAT, I like to get people talking and I know what you have being writing. I don't think it's harmful to ask that question and get the answer you gave me.
Also, what Superbia said about HF is okay. He wasn't really pushing batsnacks that hard. The lynch was only heading to batsnacks when we started talking about him, specially after I've brought he fanfic meta.
|
On October 26 2014 10:10 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 10:06 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 10:02 justanothertownie wrote:On October 26 2014 10:01 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 09:47 justanothertownie wrote:
Do you think that everything that happened leading up to the lynch is completely WIFOM GB? Of course not. But I wanted to know what have you directly got from it. In that case you should read the game. Or if you are the forgetful type my filter. JAT, I like to get people talking and I know what you have being writing. I don't think it's harmful to ask that question and get the answer you gave me. Also, what Superbia said about HF is okay. He wasn't really pushing batsnacks that hard. The lynch was only heading to batsnacks when we started talking about him, specially after I've brought he fanfic meta. You only brought that up after I told you to look at his meta mind you. And if you are trying to get people to talk - why are you doing that to the most active poster in the game? Why are you questioning me and not super? Or thrawn? Or literally anyone else?
It doesn't change the fact that it wasn't for HF's case that batsnacks got lynched.
You can push Superbia as much as you like, but push him for the right reasons.
|
On October 26 2014 09:46 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 09:40 justanothertownie wrote:On October 26 2014 09:37 Superbia wrote:
If I had gotten anything out of the interaction between bats and someone I would've included it in my reads. Honestly I feel like it's still pretty WIFOM at this point. The only available source of actual hard information is WIFOM to you? You did not even try to interpret the actions of anyone. Wtf dude. Here's the thing. I did interpret the actions of most people who were actually pushing and voting on batsnacks, I simply did not draw any conclusion. HF had an early push/vote on batsnacks which he barely followed up on, which I mentioned. Kush had a push post on snacks (iirc), but it wouldn't have swayed me at that point in time. Someone (I think it was parnassus or lian) brought up a decent quote about batsnacks assuming someone being town, but I felt it might've well been bus time at that point in time. I.e. nothing definitive.
You said the quoted post was utter bullshit, JAT.
|
On October 26 2014 10:28 Holyflare wrote:
And gb seriously stop your useless discrediting. I've seen you say every single case on batsnacks "wasn't that good" but the simple matter of fact is that people switched because of those cases and he was mafia so they were in fact good.
That's my opinion on them, HF. I don't really think you've played the most important part on his lynch.
Anyway, I'm not trying to discredit you. I'm trying to show JAT that Superbias post related to that isn't complete bullshit
|
On October 26 2014 10:30 liancourt wrote:
Still havent explained why thrawns case wasnt good... i m beginning to think you are dodging the question gb
I'm just lazy, but I can do that later
|
On October 26 2014 10:31 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 10:27 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 09:46 Superbia wrote:On October 26 2014 09:40 justanothertownie wrote:On October 26 2014 09:37 Superbia wrote:
If I had gotten anything out of the interaction between bats and someone I would've included it in my reads. Honestly I feel like it's still pretty WIFOM at this point. The only available source of actual hard information is WIFOM to you? You did not even try to interpret the actions of anyone. Wtf dude. Here's the thing. I did interpret the actions of most people who were actually pushing and voting on batsnacks, I simply did not draw any conclusion. HF had an early push/vote on batsnacks which he barely followed up on, which I mentioned. Kush had a push post on snacks (iirc), but it wouldn't have swayed me at that point in time. Someone (I think it was parnassus or lian) brought up a decent quote about batsnacks assuming someone being town, but I felt it might've well been bus time at that point in time. I.e. nothing definitive. You said the quoted post was utter bullshit, JAT. Wtf are you doing? All you have been doing for the last hours is shit on what I say. You did not try to get anyone to talk or to figure anything out. And no. I said ignoring the lynch and not considering anyone that pushed is towny is utter bullshit. I did not say that about a specific post.
I'm not shitting on what you're saying and I thought you were talking about that specific post because that's what you've posted exactly after what I've quoted.
|
On October 26 2014 10:40 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2014 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:On October 26 2014 10:28 Holyflare wrote:
And gb seriously stop your useless discrediting. I've seen you say every single case on batsnacks "wasn't that good" but the simple matter of fact is that people switched because of those cases and he was mafia so they were in fact good. That's my opinion on them, HF. I don't really think you've played the most important part on his lynch. Anyway, I'm not trying to discredit you. I'm trying to show JAT that Superbias post related to that isn't complete bullshit Like seriously. My case + follow up was the most convincing case you should have ever seen if you have played with batsnacks before. You just asked me repeatedly at deadline to tell you why batsnacks is mafia and then didn't even listen WHILE AGREEING that he was mafia based off of his fanfic filter???
The problem is that I didn't find it objectively scum.
But yeah, considering meta, it was good
|
|
|
On October 26 2014 11:21 Holyflare wrote:
Perfect game i guess doubt we have 3 blues vs 3 mafia and if thrawn was lying it would just be a 1 for 1 trade
Idc, I'll just shut up and completely sheep you
|
3 blues and 4 mafia maybe?
|
Like... A framer without a cop?
|
On October 26 2014 12:11 justanothertownie wrote:
fucking GB
<3
|
On October 26 2014 12:12 liancourt wrote:
Can u like not lynch me and just block me again on n2
What for? If there is indeed 4 mafia, it won't matter.
|
On October 26 2014 12:12 Holyflare wrote:
4 mafia vs 10 town though???
3 mislynches to LYLO, in a game where there is a vigi. Seems reasonable to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
