The Resistance: Avalon

On October 14 2014 18:38 marvellosity wrote:
Oatsmaster
liancourt
Alakaslam
Blazinghand
KelsierSC
Marvellosity
Palmar
batsnacks

If I can find 2 townies out of the bolded then I'm golden. Slam is my wildcard. Dunno anything about liancourt or Kelsier.

On October 15 2014 18:37 marvellosity wrote:
I hope you're mafia BH because if you're town you're being poopy :x

On October 16 2014 07:30 Palmar wrote:
Idk, there is no evidence of such things as you don't play video mafia.

On October 16 2014 19:21 marvellosity wrote:

Explain the reasons for thinking this. For lian, for me, for Plam.

On October 17 2014 00:49 marvellosity wrote:

Are mafia not able to townread townies?

Did you read my post this (very short) game about how it's easy for players like me and Palmar to make good sounding plans/ideas/strategies?

On October 20 2014 05:56 marvellosity wrote:

Obviously not us :p

Still don't know if Oats is mafia, still don't know how to read him, still don't know why i'd put him on a mission at this point.

I'd rather put all my efforts into figuring out Palmar+BH+Slam.

On October 20 2014 07:46 batsnacks wrote:


We already have 3 likely town on the current team. Aren't you tempted to yay? Would scum!oats even sabotage in this situation?

On October 21 2014 01:21 liancourt wrote:
I d like to see what team bh slam and damd pick actually. Any team with them will fail but even so. If they pick a team that doesnt include them i might consider it.

On October 21 2014 01:18 marvellosity wrote:
I was about to tell you that's silly, but I don't think it is necessarily.

The problem is I really don't think liancourt is mafia.

On October 21 2014 01:18 marvellosity wrote:
I was about to tell you that's silly, but I don't think it is necessarily.

The problem is I really don't think liancourt is mafia.

On October 21 2014 03:48 batsnacks wrote:
Liam is bonjwa this game trust in him

On October 21 2014 03:58 marvellosity wrote:

No, it reads "I was about to tell you that's silly (literally word for word), but I don't think it is necessarily silly (i.e. it has validity)

it's literally the opposite of discrediting

On October 21 2014 04:03 marvellosity wrote:

Alright. So let's be reasonable together now that we've ascertained I wasn't putting you down, eh? ^^

And on that note, dinner.

On October 21 2014 04:05 batsnacks wrote:


Wait... wait... you mean if we reject this mission we get to try the same mission again? It doesn't automatically move to the next mission even if we reject it?

On October 21 2014 05:32 liancourt wrote:
What is the scum motivation for all 3 scum to nay that team

discuss

On October 21 2014 18:20 marvellosity wrote:

as explained, you are a dumbass

On October 23 2014 16:09 Alakaslam wrote:
"Scum thinkers rolling town unite!"
^^
-this is how I feel reading BH posts and agreeing with them-

—————————

http://youtu.be/F1ILPl5FQaM

The Problem with that is Marv & I star in this little video together with Palmar making a quick cameo;

and I am still a dude

A 10 year old dude in a red B.C. speedo but whatever. Point is MARV is skilled in the art of convincing

On October 24 2014 11:14 Blazinghand wrote:
"blazinghand, you've been right all along"

"blazinghand, I finally see what you were saying. your play and logic was so high-level i actually couldn't understand it. But I understand now"

"blazinghand, you're correct. I can't believe I ever doubted you"

On October 28 2014 08:29 Blazinghand wrote:
I'm pretty ok with Liam and Palm. interesting though Damdred that you don't try to get yourself on the team???

IMO Alakaslam you should bring me along. I've done a good job of pushing the conversation forward and trying to discern people's alignments in a public way. Although I haven't been perfect, and I've said things that people think are scummy, I haven't been afraid to say those things. I am not some cringing manservant of the "nay-triarchy" who will dumb down his ideas because the naytriachy says they're not allowed. If I have a reason for someone being scum, even if people think it's dumb, I'll share it.

On October 28 2014 08:48 Blazinghand wrote:


yeah ok but look at it this way. if you want to get a team without yourself on it, you have to correctly identify the alignments of every other player in the game (4 town, 3 scum). However, if you include yourself on a team, you only have to identify 3 townies, not 4. So if you see 4 players who are sorta-scummy and you're not sure which one of them is the 4th townie, you can just grab the other team and have a team of 4. Or just in general, it's much lower-risk. I don't see why you wouldn't want yourself on a team

On October 28 2014 08:57 liancourt wrote:
I m going give out my analysis once we go through a cycle and we go full circle back to palmars team. At the moment giving that analysis seems risky.

On October 28 2014 11:07 liancourt wrote:
marv palmar team
lian

lian marv team
bats

marv lian team
bats
oats

marv oats team
lian
bats

Marv bats team
Slam
Palmar

marv damd team
lian
oats

I'm just gonna throw this out there. It's the list of 5 teams w/o their team leader. I posted the list w/o team leaders because it's practically a default that they're included in the team and also considering the fact that it's very likely when ur scum leader you pick the rest of ur team as town players so as to not get 2 fails.

It has a recurring theme in (pool 1) marv, lian, bats, oats. Why hasn't (pool 2) bh, slam, damd palmar appear very much?

We have a guaranteed scum in the pool 1 and a high chance of 2 scum in pool 2.

Marv lian seem to appear the most and prominent town because of the above reason. Now if I hypothesize bats is the mafia like in my previous post and scum leader only picks townies I can conclude that damd and bh is mafia because damd doesn't pick bats and damd doesn't pick bats and they neither have bh on their team.

So spies are bats bh damd.

I kinda wanted to see what team bh wanted but considering his 4th and palmar might pick wrong and pitting all of my hopes on slam making the right decision because he wants to discuss things beforehand. I could have waited until bh announced a team but dragging things out seemed boring. So slam pick a team that doesn't have bats bh and damd.

On October 28 2014 11:46 liancourt wrote:


and ur reading bats as town? But marv lian oats bats failed a mission.

You just admitted being a spy.

On October 28 2014 20:38 batsnacks wrote:
Then quit yer yappin

On October 29 2014 20:33 batsnacks wrote:
Why did you need to waste 24+ hours picking people based on post count?

On October 30 2014 03:38 Blazinghand wrote:
I'm still pretty sure marv is scum, and was the guy who sabotaged, so I'm nayvoting this team. I'll suggest a better team.

On October 30 2014 04:06 Blazinghand wrote:
well, I at least have demonstrated to batsnacks he has no reason to actually think I'm scum. I'm sure I can win over a few others.

On October 30 2014 07:04 batsnacks wrote:


The only explanation I can think of is that he is preconceived to be mafia by all but his scumreads, doesn't care if he wins anymore, and the next couple people after him are probably mafia too.

On October 29 2014 01:56 batsnacks wrote:
I don't know who mafia/spies is/are.

Marv's list looks okay. It's easy to imagine a universe where Marv is scum and this "auto-yay everything -- giving up" charade is some kind of uncharacteristically bad spy tactic. I don't think it is though.

If I didn't think BH was scum I would probably be a lot more suspicious of Marv. Maybe BH could be "busing." If so good for them, nice strat.

If I were making the team I would probably leave behind BH, Marv, damdred, and oats. Leaving behind Marv, oats, and BH covers a lot of possibilities in my head that are probably wrong. Damdred I'm inexplicably suspicious of this game.

Liam, bat, slam, palmar is a good team IMO. Id yay it.

On October 30 2014 11:30 liancourt wrote:
resistance is different than mafia. Even if you know 1 spy you actually need to know all3 in order to win. In mafia you can through 1 person at a time, but here it's different. There ar eno flips so we can only depend on the results of missions and partially on votes. Spies can just bus each other and still win they only need 1 of them in the team anyway. Speech is lacking because it's not as important in resistance as in mafia.

If you want to play like mafia we should decide right now universally to banish one person from teams from so forth. I suggest damdred because it seems most ppl have a scum read on him and he always calls his votes like he's trying to tell spies hey guys i'm voting like this.

On October 28 2014 11:07 liancourt wrote:
marv palmar team
lian

lian marv team
bats

marv lian team
bats
oats

marv oats team
lian
bats

Marv bats team
Slam
Palmar

marv damd team
lian
oats

I'm just gonna throw this out there. It's the list of 5 teams w/o their team leader. I posted the list w/o team leaders because it's practically a default that they're included in the team and also considering the fact that it's very likely when ur scum leader you pick the rest of ur team as town players so as to not get 2 fails. (2 fails are required at some point. However I get what you mean)

It has a recurring theme in (pool 1) marv, lian, bats, oats. Why hasn't (pool 2) bh, slam, damd palmar appear very much?

We have a guaranteed scum in the pool 1 and a high chance of 2 scum in pool 2. Bullshit! There could easily be two scum in pool 1, and it would conveniently be any of you.

Given palmar insta confirming you on nothing at all, I have scum points at you

I have scum points at batsnacks for being obtuse

And I have scumpoints at marv because he is Kaa

So in my eyes, all of you except oats could plausibly be scum! The exact opposite opinion of most!

Most likely, however, it is between you and marv.

Marv lian seem to appear the most and prominent town because of the above reason. ¡CHINGA la palabra! The above reason is no reason at all. Being townread does not mean you are town especially when you are on a team with a sabotage.
If the first team sent had two scum on it they might both not sabotage, thinking the other will! Or, grab dat TOWNCRED with both hands- which seems to be working this game if that is the case!
So no- WHAT above reason? Now if I hypothesize bats is the mafia like in my previous post and scum leader only picks townies I can conclude that damd and bh is mafia because damd doesn't pick bats and damd doesn't pick bats and they neither have bh on their team. this point is both confused and WIFOM. States the same team twice & shit.

So spies are bats bh damd. except regarding Damdred I highly doubt this, but you could be right on bats; only problem is that means you and marv basically would have to be town as far as I can tell. Yet there is still wifom

I kinda wanted to see what team bh wanted but considering his 4th and palmar might pick wrong and pitting all of my hopes on slam making the right decision because he wants to discuss things beforehand. I could have waited until bh announced a team but dragging things out seemed boring. So slam pick a team that doesn't have bats bh and damd.
Lol my team only has BH

And he is my strongest Townread in the game but I heavily scumread palmar

On October 30 2014 14:38 liancourt wrote:
all ur arguments against me are wifom. They could be this way or that it's a coin flip. pool A can have 2 yes but i posted reasons why pool a is more likely to have only 1. I'm not yaying that team because you made counter arguments for all of my points. You need to come up with your own orignal reasons why you picked that team. Countering my case to make your team justifiable isn't very convincing to me slam. I have you down as town, but come on I know you can do better.

On October 30 2014 20:45 marvellosity wrote:
does anyone actually want to win more than they want the game to end at this point

On November 01 2014 02:16 marvellosity wrote:
if people wren't retarded, i'd still be trying.

On November 04 2014 05:54 marvellosity wrote:

because i passed the only successful team, i have easily the longest filter, and i'm obviously town unless you're blind?

also can you confirm you're peddling the 2-mafia-in-first-team-with-no-sabotage theory for me please?

On November 05 2014 02:12 marvellosity wrote:

you shouldn't, because it's the team that passed + you as 4 players.

On November 05 2014 02:45 Blazinghand wrote:
so some context since apparently I'm not clear. Palm points out that this team mathematically has one scum on it, which is of course an inane observation, since the team will need 2 scum to fail. My response is:



I'm not asserting the team has only one scum, nor do I think this is a good scum. I'm just pointing out that Palmar's logic and reasoning skills are inferior to mine, because in the event there really was only one scum, this would be an acceptable team.

It is not.

On November 05 2014 02:49 marvellosity wrote:

KISS

for god's sake

On November 05 2014 02:51 marvellosity wrote:

Sadly I can lead a horse to water, but I cannot make it drink.

On November 05 2014 10:58 Blazinghand wrote:


so this was like 36 hours ago which means we have like 12 hours left

everyone's voting no, right?

On November 05 2014 15:28 Blazinghand wrote:


which would mean, i assume, scumreading bats?