Avogadro's Number Mini Mafia - Page 25

On October 13 2014 01:23 GlowingBear wrote:


This is a good observation.

Also, I noticed that Oats, who's being too passive, never cited sqrt in his posts.

I am NOT doing associative reads right now. I just think that lynching one of them would be pretty informative.

On October 13 2014 01:23 Oatsmaster wrote:

you clearly dont understand the situation.

On October 12 2014 17:19 Chairman Ray wrote:
I'm pretty confident that sqrt is scum atm.

Sqrt entered the thread with a joke scumclaim (which is fine imo), but then left for a few hours, and re-entered the thread with some really bad reads after some people were pushing on him. There's a clear difference when town is giving bad reads and when scum is giving bad reads, and it's clear that his reads show a scum mindset. His reasonings are all just "this person did X, therefore he's mafia", without any regard to why X is scummy.

I will summarize all his reads:

CR is mafia because he made 2 filler posts
VE is mafia because he gave a townread on geript and himself
Geript is mafia because he's buddying DP
GB is mafia because he didn't want to discuss one of his scumreads

What else do those 4 reads have in common? Firstly, they are barely relevant to the game with everything else that's happened. Secondly, they all appear near the start of their filters.

So what does this mean? This means that sqrt probably just clicked on a few people's filter, read until he could comment on one thing, and then stopped there. Scummy as hell.

One other thing that I find interesting. When I defended sqrt's read on GB, he responded to me normally. Let's take a step back and look at this. Sqrt thinks I'm mafia. That means when I ask him something, it should cross his mind that I'm mafia with an agenda other than getting more information. He should have noticed that I asked him about GB, and didn't respond at all on his reads on me. That's one very obvious thing a town sqrt should have noticed. What's more interesting is that he has both GB an I as scumreads, but when I defended GB, he responded to me like he's trying to convince me of his read. For someone who accused geript and DP of buddying, it should have been 1000% obvious that I'm buddying GB, but nope, not at all. Scum scum scummy scummy scum scum.

##Vote: sqrtofneg1

On October 13 2014 01:24 Oatsmaster wrote:

lynching for "info" is really bad.
Why are you proposing it?

On October 13 2014 01:23 GlowingBear wrote:


This is a good observation.

On October 13 2014 01:27 GlowingBear wrote:


I'm not lynching for info. You've being too passive and rayn brought a good point regarding sqrt.

You both are acting scummy.

On October 13 2014 01:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Explain how does the part you bolded make any sense at all?
I literally had a brainfart and it in fact does NOT make any sense.

##unvote
##vote: GlowingBear

On October 13 2014 01:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
Easiest way to get lynched is probably to shit on rayn.

On October 13 2014 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote:

Then why use that word?
You dont use words unless you mean them.
And you are implying that my flip is connected to sqrt.
Thats associative.

On October 13 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote:


LOL it totally makes sense. That guy claimed scum. He says hi and goes into lurking. Doesn't contribute at all but with bad reads.

WHY is nobody pushing him? Easiest thing to do as mafia.

On October 13 2014 01:32 VisceraEyes wrote:

I'm not trying to get lynched - I'm trying not to do shit while rayn is alive. Jeez, I'm not like playing against my wincon or anything Oats.

On October 13 2014 01:33 GlowingBear wrote:


Will be associative if one of you flips mafia. But I'm not willing to lynch you based on associative reads now. That's what I'm trying to say.

On October 13 2014 01:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Why would you not do shit when i am alive?