Avogadro's Number Mini Mafia - Page 2

On October 12 2014 19:02 DarthPunk wrote:


The setup does not make primes mutually exclusive. There could be as many as 3 and as few as 0.

On October 12 2014 19:08 DarthPunk wrote:


Yeah what I am saying is that there could be more. I see no reason not to believe hopeless for now.

And yeah the modifications are to help scum be able to fake claim something.

What do you think of glowing bear?

On October 12 2014 21:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Come on Oats you were mafia with him in the said game.. Don't you remember anything?

On October 13 2014 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:

It's not a fight.
It's me calling GB scum for something and him saying "i misphrased my post that's why it's scummy".

On October 13 2014 01:02 GlowingBear wrote:


Propose something different, contribute. You've being hiding too much.

Who's mafia?

On October 13 2014 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I am trying to get more information since you are just staying in the sidelines and not telling what we should be talking about. Which is scummy since you seem to think both of us are town. Two townies are fighting and you don't give the thread a new direction while clearly being here. Why Oats? What should we talk about?

On October 13 2014 01:08 GlowingBear wrote:
I've just skimmed your filter and I couldn't see you pushing anyone.
There isn't a single scum read from you.

And as Rayn said, we've been debating for two pages, and you think we are both town. Why not strongly interveining and put us in the direction of your scumread, if you have one?

On October 13 2014 01:20 VisceraEyes wrote:

##Vote: Oatsmaster
There's need now bitch.

On October 13 2014 01:23 GlowingBear wrote:


This is a good observation.

Also, I noticed that Oats, who's being too passive, never cited sqrt in his posts.

I am NOT doing associative reads right now. I just think that lynching one of them would be pretty informative.

On October 12 2014 17:19 Chairman Ray wrote:
I'm pretty confident that sqrt is scum atm.

Sqrt entered the thread with a joke scumclaim (which is fine imo), but then left for a few hours, and re-entered the thread with some really bad reads after some people were pushing on him. There's a clear difference when town is giving bad reads and when scum is giving bad reads, and it's clear that his reads show a scum mindset. His reasonings are all just "this person did X, therefore he's mafia", without any regard to why X is scummy.

I will summarize all his reads:

CR is mafia because he made 2 filler posts
VE is mafia because he gave a townread on geript and himself
Geript is mafia because he's buddying DP
GB is mafia because he didn't want to discuss one of his scumreads

What else do those 4 reads have in common? Firstly, they are barely relevant to the game with everything else that's happened. Secondly, they all appear near the start of their filters.

So what does this mean? This means that sqrt probably just clicked on a few people's filter, read until he could comment on one thing, and then stopped there. Scummy as hell.

One other thing that I find interesting. When I defended sqrt's read on GB, he responded to me normally. Let's take a step back and look at this. Sqrt thinks I'm mafia. That means when I ask him something, it should cross his mind that I'm mafia with an agenda other than getting more information. He should have noticed that I asked him about GB, and didn't respond at all on his reads on me. That's one very obvious thing a town sqrt should have noticed. What's more interesting is that he has both GB an I as scumreads, but when I defended GB, he responded to me like he's trying to convince me of his read. For someone who accused geript and DP of buddying, it should have been 1000% obvious that I'm buddying GB, but nope, not at all. Scum scum scummy scummy scum scum.

##Vote: sqrtofneg1

On October 13 2014 01:27 GlowingBear wrote:


I'm not lynching for info. You've being too passive and rayn brought a good point regarding sqrt.

You both are acting scummy.