|
On October 12 2014 07:25 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 07:22 geript wrote: This is going to be sweet. I think we're all town. I wonder who between DP, VE and myself they're going to risk shooting. I also think we three could all be town. The only thing that gives me pause is "vet balancing" IM not sure if BH does it or not though. This is BH, the strongest advocate for RNG everything. I'm pretty confident the game is 100% random
|
On October 12 2014 07:27 geript wrote: Hopeless, Damdred and Sqrt are the only people I'm interested in lynching right now. I'm going to watch the pro tour for a bit, but I'm like 65% sure both DP and VE are town which is better than expected for now. So we're probably looking at just killing the weak links for an easy win. so about the other like 5 or 6 players who havent posted yet...
|
On October 12 2014 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 07:30 Hopeless1der wrote:On October 12 2014 07:27 geript wrote: Hopeless, Damdred and Sqrt are the only people I'm interested in lynching right now. I'm going to watch the pro tour for a bit, but I'm like 65% sure both DP and VE are town which is better than expected for now. So we're probably looking at just killing the weak links for an easy win. so about the other like 5 or 6 players who havent posted yet... They're all guilty until proven innocent. Haven't you played before? whoosh
|
On October 12 2014 07:35 Chairman Ray wrote: This is worrisome.
You guys started the game picking on small, insignificant things, and some pointless votes were thrown around. Wasn't too long before you guys all started town reading one another.
Either you guys all have very obvious town metas, or this may indicate a conversation between mafia. this isnt worrisome. if it gets to the end of D1 and none of them has flipped out on each other, i'll start looking for shifty eyes.
|
GB scummy for making no sense about DP and dodging geript townie for tryhard VE is buddying, null.
|
On October 12 2014 07:43 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 07:41 Damdred wrote: @GB tell me what you think about CR right now He "parroted" me. Gotta hear more from him. I'm really worried about sqrt right now. He said hi and disappeared i'm more concerned that he claimed scum, but thats just me.
|
On October 12 2014 07:52 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote: GB scummy for making no sense about DP and dodging geript townie for tryhard VE is buddying, null. How did GB dodgee? He seems to have answered every question i put to him about it, what do you think about all of his responses? he keeps saying "i dont want to talk about this anymore" re: his DP read.
|
On October 12 2014 07:59 GlowingBear wrote: Hope, explain to me mafia motivation behind clearly saying that I don't want to talk about DP but I'm free to talk about anything else. lack of transparency, accountability and clarity.
|
|
i'm curious did anyone else click on this link to see whats up with GB's meta read?
|
On October 13 2014 02:24 VisceraEyes wrote: Rayn thinks Oats is now confirmed town GB. ggnore. I think oats is town too, but he's also bad :S
|
VE how do you feel about GB's meta read of damdred?
|
On October 13 2014 02:31 VisceraEyes wrote: It's completely unsubstantiated. I don't give a shit if he links me another game, without him saying what /he/ finds similar then it's a complete airball. In the context that you played in the game he linked, do you have a similar read on damdred? or is it not a relevant comparsion, considering 5-player, instant majority etc.
|
On October 13 2014 02:33 VisceraEyes wrote: It's not relevant - there was very little similar about how one had to play both alignments between the games. and yet GB thinks he can justify a townread on damdred with it. Did you even notice that he'd liked that game earlier?
|
ebwopOn October 13 2014 02:34 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 02:33 VisceraEyes wrote: It's not relevant - there was very little similar about how one had to play both alignments between the games. and yet GB thinks he can justify a townread on damdred with it. Did you even notice that he'd liked linked that game earlier?
|
On October 13 2014 02:36 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 02:34 VisceraEyes wrote: The important thing is that I can see GB making that read as both mafia and town, so it's null to me. yeah you ninja'd me kind of. why not comment on it before now?
|
On October 13 2014 02:43 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 02:38 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't realize what game it was, no. I didn't follow the link because he said "does anyone think anything is similar" rather than "I find X similar to this game, and Y as well but he does Z differently so that gives me pause" I actually said that his line of questioning was similar to his townplay, like the one you could find on that micro mafia. I think damdred is more inclined to do unsubstantiated wall of posts when he is mafia. I have yet to search for a game he played as mafia to show you that, but I'm too lazy to do that. But it's up to you to believe it or not. Just find and lynch scum.I also said that I'm ready to rescind my town read on him. Reason being: he is too passive. It is not up to us to believe. This is why you are being scumread, you say you know something then refuse to share with the class. Do you have a reason at all or are you making up bullshit? we dont know, hence we ask.
|
On October 13 2014 02:51 Oatsmaster wrote: Woah red scary.
Hey hopeless, you wanna lynch rikoty? Cause thats totally happening I don't particularly want to, he doesnt seem scummy. For the sake of my stomach, yeah sure lets do this.
|
where's sqrt i want some more sick reads from him.
|
On October 13 2014 04:50 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 23:25 GlowingBear wrote: He then townreads sqrt. He came to the thread, made a joke and lurked. Contributed with nothing. When he posts his reads, he is town because he have different reads from everybody? Do you think this is alignment indicative? I don't.
Why do you think this makes me mafia, yet DP isn't when DP arrives at literally almost word for word the exact same conclusion on sqrt a couple pages later? Your criticism is uneven; dat be a maf indicator. Your post about me felt like you were committed to scum reading me because of what you said last night, not particularly because you had a scum read on me. Very forced, over-committing. I also completely agree with CR about the point he made regarding over-stating how you're at a party even though no one prompted it. How do you feel about CR's case?
|
|
|
|