On October 08 2014 06:15 Palmar wrote:
You understand the "fan" post has nothing to do with the game at hand, I just like slam's posting in general, and I don't like how batsnacks plays the game. Go read the last game if you need any explanation as to why batsnacks is a dick and shouldn't be listened to.

I bet I can get you lynched again.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 21:52 GMT

#768

I think I'm changing my scum reads to keiser and Oats. Where is oats?

He "pressures" keiser with a vote:

On October 07 2014 16:30 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

clearly you arent reading hard enough. HF gave a fine explanation and even explained why he said "filter" in the first place.

And you dont understand the reasoning behind HF's case.
HF is saying that Obi keeps complaining about there not being content but Obi isnt doing anything to create content. No analysis. No reread then some new insight. Just chitchatting with Damdred.

Obi doesnt even use the defense that you proposed which means its clearly not what Obi was doing.

Therefore you're townread on him is bad and that means you are scum.
##vote KelsierSC

Then he's satisfied very easily with I'm not sure what for I'm not sure what reasons:

On October 07 2014 19:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah cool you changed my mind. Great job kelsier.

##unvote
Liancourt and oo might be scum.
Liancourt cause he has no scum reads other than "they did nothing"

Then he picks the easy target that isn't his mafia buddy:

On October 08 2014 02:07 Oatsmaster wrote:
##vote oo
I tshink this is the pretty clear choice for today.

The only time he's mentioned OO previously was here, in the same post he scum reads keiser:

On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff.
Too bad to be scum is my current read.

Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons.
So is oo.
I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question

And he's scum reading them both for literally "reasons [sic]"

His vote on keiser seems fake.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 21:57 GMT

#772

On October 08 2014 06:55 Palmar wrote:
batsnacks with the associative reads

#proscumhunter

It's not an associative read. I think his vote is fake even if they're not both scum, which I think they both are.

Why are you posting when you haven't read the thread?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:03 GMT

#776

On October 08 2014 07:00 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Because interactive reads are usually far more valuable than reading after the fact, because you can more accurately process the emotional state of the player involved. This is one of the main reasons that by far the largest contributor to success in mafia is simply spending as much time as you can in front of the thread.

You're can't interact with the thread if you haven't read the thread. What you're doing is interacting with yourself.

We're all watching you "interact" with yourself.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:06 GMT

#778

On October 08 2014 07:04 Hopeless1der wrote:

Show nested quote +

you just interacted with palmar. sadly its useless, but you've already proven yourself wrong. grats

Don't be upset.

On a scale of 1 to 10 how strongly do you think Oats felt about keiser being mafia?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:09 GMT

#780

On October 08 2014 07:07 Hopeless1der wrote:
7ish

So, about where on the scale is strong enough to actually give reasons other than him just saying he scum reads keiser for "reasons"? 8? 9?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:13 GMT

#783

On October 08 2014 07:11 Hopeless1der wrote:
wait are you saying i have to explain or are you saying oats didnt explain?

I'm saying oats didn't explain. His reasons for scum reading and voting keiser were LITERALLY:

"reasons"

As in he just wrote the word "reasons" and didn't say anything else.

"reasons" is also the why he unvoted and switched to OO.

He didn't say anything else.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:23 GMT

#788

I think I read some names wrong on my phone earlier. Maybe it's not oats that I'm supposed to be scum reading... I don't remember. I'll unvote him now.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:41 GMT

#794

If no one here knew each other I think a few more people would have scum read BH for his RNG thing. I also think if no one here knew each other more than a few people would be scum reading palmar. BH and palmar play a lot though, so just about everyone but Liam is used to seeing this from both of them.

And I think it's positive that he learned, accepted, and worked with that in regards to BH.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 22:45 GMT

#801

On October 08 2014 07:43 Damdred wrote:
Grack if I said there is a decent chance bats could be scum would you think I'm crazy

This is because of what I said about free townreads for Liam, isn't it? You won't catch me with that this game.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 23:04 GMT

#812

On October 08 2014 07:54 Damdred wrote:

Show nested quote +

This is actually null for me this game bat, I think every time we've playes together and you were town you are 100% towards giving the newer players a pass for day one.

What would you say to that you are posting extremely structured, you are forming cases without tunneling and you are posting during certain time frames?

I'd say thank you...

If you're scum reading me for those reasons though I would say that I am capable of being structured as either alignment. I am also capable of being unstructured as either alignment.

I would say that my cases haven't been that great; honestly if anyone I made a case against is mafia it's probably not because of what I said in the case, though it might be because how they reacted to my case. I have a tendency (as town) to read people based on their reactions, to my own posts in particular. I don't really read people based on how they are acting in the thread as a whole.

And I always post at about the same time every day.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 23:05 GMT

#814

Hold up I don't want to miss the train

##vote: ObiWanShinobi

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 23:29 GMT

#831

ANYWAY DAMDRED I hope you do scum read me because being townread by a bunch of people is not my comfort zone

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 07 2014 23:35 GMT

#834

On October 08 2014 08:31 Damdred wrote:
@Bats I think I understand what you are saying bats. And yes there are examples of you playing that way. So maybe I trust you for now unless some of your prominent scum tells come out and I won't divuldge damdreds super meta explanation of bats.

Now here's where I am in the thread there are still a few question marks for me in the thread. But I think oo unless he returns is the best lynch just to clear the deck even if he isn't scum. If he doesn't participate today he probably won't next cycle and we will be stuck on him then

It makes me crazy that you might have some super secret way of reading me that I have no idea about. The free towntells one when I'm scum was good, I've been looking out for that ever since you said it.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

October 08 2014 00:28 GMT

#855

On October 08 2014 09:24 Holyflare wrote:
i just want to lynch someone

how about obiwan?