EPTIf Liam is scum HF is not accurate
Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
If Liam is scum HF is not accurate | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
I can't manufacture sense I'm just posting because I'm bored. I will stop if this annoys you but I won't stop if it annoys hopeless. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
But I do know that vato means dog | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:15 Palmar wrote: You understand the "fan" post has nothing to do with the game at hand, I just like slam's posting in general, and I don't like how batsnacks plays the game. Go read the last game if you need any explanation as to why batsnacks is a dick and shouldn't be listened to. I bet I can get you lynched again.  | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
He "pressures" keiser with a vote: On October 07 2014 16:30 Oatsmaster wrote: clearly you arent reading hard enough. HF gave a fine explanation and even explained why he said "filter" in the first place. And you dont understand the reasoning behind HF's case. HF is saying that Obi keeps complaining about there not being content but Obi isnt doing anything to create content. No analysis. No reread then some new insight. Just chitchatting with Damdred. Obi doesnt even use the defense that you proposed which means its clearly not what Obi was doing. Therefore you're townread on him is bad and that means you are scum. ##vote KelsierSC Then he's satisfied very easily with I'm not sure what for I'm not sure what reasons: On October 07 2014 19:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah cool you changed my mind. Great job kelsier. ##unvote Liancourt and oo might be scum. Liancourt cause he has no scum reads other than "they did nothing" Then he picks the easy target that isn't his mafia buddy: On October 08 2014 02:07 Oatsmaster wrote: ##vote oo I tshink this is the pretty clear choice for today. The only time he's mentioned OO previously was here, in the same post he scum reads keiser: On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote: The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff. Too bad to be scum is my current read. Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons. So is oo. I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question  And he's scum reading them both for literally "reasons [sic]" His vote on keiser seems fake. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:55 Palmar wrote: batsnacks with the associative reads #proscumhunter It's not an associative read. I think his vote is fake even if they're not both scum, which I think they both are. Why are you posting when you haven't read the thread? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:00 Palmar wrote: Because interactive reads are usually far more valuable than reading after the fact, because you can more accurately process the emotional state of the player involved. This is one of the main reasons that by far the largest contributor to success in mafia is simply spending as much time as you can in front of the thread. You're can't interact with the thread if you haven't read the thread. What you're doing is interacting with yourself. We're all watching you "interact" with yourself. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:04 Hopeless1der wrote: you just interacted with palmar. sadly its useless, but you've already proven yourself wrong. grats Don't be upset. On a scale of 1 to 10 how strongly do you think Oats felt about keiser being mafia? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:07 Hopeless1der wrote: 7ish So, about where on the scale is strong enough to actually give reasons other than him just saying he scum reads keiser for "reasons"? 8? 9? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:11 Hopeless1der wrote: wait are you saying i have to explain or are you saying oats didnt explain? I'm saying oats didn't explain. His reasons for scum reading and voting keiser were LITERALLY: "reasons" As in he just wrote the word "reasons" and didn't say anything else. "reasons" is also the why he unvoted and switched to OO. He didn't say anything else. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
And I think it's positive that he learned, accepted, and worked with that in regards to BH. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:43 Damdred wrote: Grack if I said there is a decent chance bats could be scum would you think I'm crazy This is because of what I said about free townreads for Liam, isn't it? You won't catch me with that this game. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:54 Damdred wrote: This is actually null for me this game bat, I think every time we've playes together and you were town you are 100% towards giving the newer players a pass for day one. What would you say to that you are posting extremely structured, you are forming cases without tunneling and you are posting during certain time frames? I'd say thank you... If you're scum reading me for those reasons though I would say that I am capable of being structured as either alignment. I am also capable of being unstructured as either alignment. I would say that my cases haven't been that great; honestly if anyone I made a case against is mafia it's probably not because of what I said in the case, though it might be because how they reacted to my case. I have a tendency (as town) to read people based on their reactions, to my own posts in particular. I don't really read people based on how they are acting in the thread as a whole. And I always post at about the same time every day. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
##vote: ObiWanShinobi | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 08:31 Damdred wrote: @Bats I think I understand what you are saying bats. And yes there are examples of you playing that way. So maybe I trust you for now unless some of your prominent scum tells come out and I won't divuldge damdreds super meta explanation of bats. Now here's where I am in the thread there are still a few question marks for me in the thread. But I think oo unless he returns is the best lynch just to clear the deck even if he isn't scum. If he doesn't participate today he probably won't next cycle and we will be stuck on him then It makes me crazy that you might have some super secret way of reading me that I have no idea about. The free towntells one when I'm scum was good, I've been looking out for that ever since you said it. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 09:24 Holyflare wrote: i just want to lynch someone how about obiwan? | ||
| ||
