|
On September 28 2014 00:27 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:23 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:22 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:21 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:18 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:16 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:15 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:13 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
Nah. Killing killing might be a very good idea though, I admit. TELL ME WHY I'M MAFIA. PLEASE You came in 5 minutes before deadline shitting on the lynch and were way too sure that hopeless would flip town. I agree with this. Speaking as town there is no way I was moving my vote on hopeless especially after he said he was moving into a new apartment, hiking in the mountains or something, and in the middle of the desert. At least I think he claimed to be all of those places I don't really remember. Then he showed up in the last 10 minutes to do nothing. I agree he was useless BUT NO MORE USELESS THAN SKYDRAGON. Why did it get switched from one useless to another? + Show Spoiler + Why were you townreading him though? I liked his posts especially the one about the early haru swtich by HF and then he was calling me town so I knew it was love at first sight. If you vote Palmar I'll townread you. Why? Itchy trigger finger? Aren't you curious if he will or not? I know I am.
Uhm, ok...
|
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game.
|
On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game.
Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass?
|
On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game.
I don't feel like cooperating with someone who is fine with lynching town.
|
On September 28 2014 00:33 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. I don't feel like cooperating with someone who is fine with lynching town.
I am not.
And your recent actions are directly pushing mafia agenda, thus you must be mafia, and I am lynching mafia.
|
On September 28 2014 00:31 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass?
Wasn't I just doing exactly that? I just took someone's posting, demonstrated that it was blatantly mafia favored agenda, and I am voting him for it. Everyone else should be doing the same.
|
On September 28 2014 00:35 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:31 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass? Wasn't I just doing exactly that? I just took someone's posting, demonstrated that it was blatantly mafia favored agenda, and I am voting him for it. Everyone else should be doing the same.
If he's not outting as seer, just don't vote who you think he's softing a red on. If he's seer, he's being useless. If he's mafia, his fake red isn't dying. If he's vt, he's just trying to lynch someone.
|
On September 28 2014 00:35 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:31 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass? Wasn't I just doing exactly that? I just took someone's posting, demonstrated that it was blatantly mafia favored agenda, and I am voting him for it. Everyone else should be doing the same.
Wrong. You just took something only you said and only you believe (that I claimed seer), and shut down the thread because I won't cooperate with your stupid demands.
I am voting -you- for pushing a mafia agenda.
|
Btw Palmar if you are somehow town, I'm fine with lynching you and never playing with you again for intentionally ruining a game.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 00:22 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:21 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:18 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:16 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:15 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:13 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:11 HaruRH wrote:On September 28 2014 00:10 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:06 Holyflare wrote:
I dislike people that say random shit like "mafia led bandwagons" but then don't point out how it was mafia led or what causes it, it's so superficial and useless. Indeed. Same about "there are that many mafia on this wagon and one on the others". Completely baseless and stupid statement. You're just jelly. Nah. Killing killing might be a very good idea though, I admit. TELL ME WHY I'M MAFIA. PLEASE You came in 5 minutes before deadline shitting on the lynch and were way too sure that hopeless would flip town. I agree with this. Speaking as town there is no way I was moving my vote on hopeless especially after he said he was moving into a new apartment, hiking in the mountains or something, and in the middle of the desert. At least I think he claimed to be all of those places I don't really remember. Then he showed up in the last 10 minutes to do nothing. I agree he was useless BUT NO MORE USELESS THAN SKYDRAGON. Why did it get switched from one useless to another? + Show Spoiler + Why were you townreading him though? I liked his posts especially the one about the early haru swtich by HF and then he was calling me town so I knew it was love at first sight.
I don't know why you keep bringing this up when i literally told you he copied the same post from your scum read but you didn't shift that read at all knowing that
|
Batsnacks this isn't helping. Why don't you just clarify if you have a redcheck or not?
|
On September 28 2014 00:41 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks this isn't helping. Why don't you just clarify if you have a redcheck or not?
Why don't you go read my filter and determine for yourself whether I have a redcheck or not?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 00:18 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:16 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:15 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:13 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:11 HaruRH wrote:On September 28 2014 00:10 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 00:06 Holyflare wrote:
I dislike people that say random shit like "mafia led bandwagons" but then don't point out how it was mafia led or what causes it, it's so superficial and useless. Indeed. Same about "there are that many mafia on this wagon and one on the others". Completely baseless and stupid statement. You're just jelly. Nah. Killing killing might be a very good idea though, I admit. TELL ME WHY I'M MAFIA. PLEASE You came in 5 minutes before deadline shitting on the lynch and were way too sure that hopeless would flip town. I agree with this. Speaking as town there is no way I was moving my vote on hopeless especially after he said he was moving into a new apartment, hiking in the mountains or something, and in the middle of the desert. At least I think he claimed to be all of those places I don't really remember. Then he showed up in the last 10 minutes to do nothing.
This is a really odd way to write this paragraph btw
|
On September 28 2014 00:42 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:41 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks this isn't helping. Why don't you just clarify if you have a redcheck or not? Why don't you go read my filter and determine for yourself whether I have a redcheck or not?
I don't recall you ever claiming a check besides that weird post on HF. What is this question?
|
On September 28 2014 00:38 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:35 Palmar wrote:On September 28 2014 00:31 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass? Wasn't I just doing exactly that? I just took someone's posting, demonstrated that it was blatantly mafia favored agenda, and I am voting him for it. Everyone else should be doing the same. Wrong. You just took something only you said and only you believe (that I claimed seer), and shut down the thread because I won't cooperate with your stupid demands. I am voting -you- for pushing a mafia agenda.
Here's the thing, I've proven there is literally no downside for you in clearing up the ambiguity, even your scummate JAT is telling you to just that.
I have told you exactly how we can clean up this mess, yet you insist on creating unnecessary conflict.
Fuck you.
|
Me and snatbacks vs the world
|
Everyone should be voting batsnacks. Please do so.
|
On September 28 2014 00:46 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:38 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 00:35 Palmar wrote:On September 28 2014 00:31 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 00:28 Palmar wrote:
I don't see why this is so hard guys, we're lynching batsnacks.
He literally cannot be town.
If he is town, all he has to say is "oh sorry Palmar and HF, I am not claiming a check or anything, if that's what you thought", and we can move on. This doesn't mean he has to claim he's not the cop, simply that at that point in the game, he was not trying to claim a check on holyflare.
There is only one faction in mafia that benefits at all from any kind of confusion or ambiguous information, and that is mafia. Thus batsnacks MUST be mafia.
If he is somehow town, I'm fine with lynching him and never playing with him again for intentionally ruining a game. Why don't you just try and read people instead of being an ass? Wasn't I just doing exactly that? I just took someone's posting, demonstrated that it was blatantly mafia favored agenda, and I am voting him for it. Everyone else should be doing the same. Wrong. You just took something only you said and only you believe (that I claimed seer), and shut down the thread because I won't cooperate with your stupid demands. I am voting -you- for pushing a mafia agenda. Here's the thing, I've proven there is literally no downside for you in clearing up the ambiguity, even your scummate JAT is telling you to just that. I have told you exactly how we can clean up this mess, yet you insist on creating unnecessary conflict. Fuck you.
Sorry to disappoint you Palmar. My scummate is just to stubborn.
|
The conflict is very necessary. Scum.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 27 2014 22:50 batsnacks wrote:
I have a really strong feeling HF is wolf. I just don't have any evidence to support this claim. I don't even know why I think this.
On September 27 2014 22:28 batsnacks wrote:
##vote: Holyflare
On September 27 2014 23:13 batsnacks wrote:
HF I only sheeped you on Superbia and I never even voted Superbia, I just said I would be willing to.
You had really like 3 scum reads. GB, Superbia and Hopeless where your vote ended at the start of the day.
Your first scum read GB and your case stemmed from exactly what I had already said about GB. Thus it was a sheep.
On September 25 2014 09:51 batsnacks wrote:
I agree with what HF is saying about GB
Your second scum read Superbia who you did not even vote on for undisclosed reasons was sheeped from me.
On September 27 2014 02:45 batsnacks wrote:
I'm phone
Would lynch
Superbia because
HF good
I also scum read Skydragon which you were doing too so really you've agreed with me on 3/3 reads here.
Then hopeless returns who I am already on and you follow onto that wagon too when he returns to do nothing.
That's 4/4 reads that you have agreed with me on but you suddenly have an unknown reason to lynch me, not only this but you most definitely pretended to claim seer and antagonised palmar and are now trying to brush it off like you didn't do anything at all and are playing the dick card, so why have I suddenly become your top mafia read again?
Oh wait, because you're most likely mafia.
##vote batsnacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
