|
On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though?
are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively?
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though? are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively?
That would have been helpful, I am asking them respectively.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
don't know what to make of batsnacks, will look again tomorrow when less tired/stoned
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 10:47 marvellosity wrote:
don't know what to make of batsnacks, will look again tomorrow when less tired/stoned
You're supposed to play less stoned?
I wont be doing any of that.
|
On September 16 2014 10:42 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though? are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively? That would have been helpful, I am asking them respectively.
VE made a few comments earlier about how people were ignoring me and they shouldn't be. Then he probably voted me because he got tired and didn't want to wait up for me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 16 2014 10:51 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:47 marvellosity wrote:
don't know what to make of batsnacks, will look again tomorrow when less tired/stoned You're supposed to play less stoned? I wont be doing any of that.
hahaha. good man.
|
Aren't you guys glad I told fecal to /in
You guys were all like "read a guide," "play a newbie game," etc.
|
Canada11355 Posts
half the reason I invested in my own shop was so I could be stoned at work and spend all my down time on a computer.
Living the dream.
batsnacks I guess you aren't worried about him gaining any traction, since you don't seem too upset about being voted. I follow your logic on palmar and you even typed that you voted for him but you didn't post in the voting thread.
|
On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo.
On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then?
I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 10:59 batsnacks wrote:
Aren't you guys glad I told fecal to /in
You guys were all like "read a guide," "play a newbie game," etc.
Yeah you had my back, man. We're practically brothers.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
THIS ALSO MAKES SENSE NOW
I'm so conflicted.
(why did you vote Lord Tolkien?)
|
On September 16 2014 10:42 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though? are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively? That would have been helpful, I am asking them respectively.
I mentioned It earlier, but I'm voting him because half the players aren't active at all, and out of those players, he seems the most scummy to me.
|
On September 16 2014 11:00 Fecalfeast wrote:
half the reason I invested in my own shop was so I could be stoned at work and spend all my down time on a computer.
Living the dream.
batsnacks I guess you aren't worried about him gaining any traction, since you don't seem too upset about being voted. I follow your logic on palmar and you even typed that you voted for him but you didn't post in the voting thread.
He hasn't given reasons yet other than "people shouldn't be ignoring me" so there's not much I can do about his vote other than keep doing what I would be doing anyway. And I forgot about the voting thread, again.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 11:03 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:42 Fecalfeast wrote:On September 16 2014 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though? are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively? That would have been helpful, I am asking them respectively. I mentioned It earlier, but I'm voting him because half the players aren't active at all, and out of those players, he seems the most scummy to me.
Oh I must have skimmed by. my bad.
|
On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia."
|
On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here.
On September 16 2014 09:22 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea...I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I also don't like how you called me out for defending poofter when you're trying to pressure, but then you defend Lord Tolkien when I'm trying to pressure
Half an hour later
On September 16 2014 09:52 Chairman Ray wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Lord Tolkein
I dont get why it took a half hour to vote. Whats the point of it anyways?
|
On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia."
So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him?
|
On September 16 2014 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia." So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him?
You mean like, if he said "Mafia, I am" instead of "I am mafia"?
No I'd feel exactly the same even if he changed the words.
|
On September 16 2014 11:16 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:
[quote]
The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia." So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him? You mean like, if he said "Mafia, I am" instead of "I am mafia"? No I'd feel exactly the same even if he changed the words.
I think you know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
