|
On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea...I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response)
I also don't like how you called me out for defending poofter when you're trying to pressure, but then you defend Lord Tolkien when I'm trying to pressure
|
Someone say something interesting to me.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea..
On September 16 2014 09:17 StorrZerg wrote:
@fecalfeast because he isn't doing anything....
@yamato join me on my crusade to lynch tehpoofter
if not lets talk, why do you hate Damdred so much?
Is there something I'm missing here? Why is Lord Tolkien a bad pressure for the same reason you are pressuring poofter?
|
Holy shit 54 pages. lol. I'm going to read while watching the football game.
|
At the start of the day I had this plan to catch scum!robik and/or scum!obiwan by taking advantage of their beef with each other. I knew robik would vote obiwan at some point especially if I provoked it a little. Figured why not get it out of the way early:
On September 15 2014 06:52 batsnacks wrote:
Hey robik. I heard you hate obiwan, wanna vote him with me? I'll take the plunge first. Let me know.
##vote: ObiWanShinobi
If I had realized there was a voting thread I probably would have posted there too but it's just as well that I didn't, I wasn't serious about the vote. Robik as planned did vote obiwan and beef did ensue. Robik did that thing where he called a bunch of people retards for disliking his stupid "personal reasons" vote. If I were present in the thread when all of that was happening I would have voted robik and I would have felt good about it, especially after he started spamming in all caps and throwing a tantrum about people voting him. But he's like 6 pages of filter since then and is looking a lot better. I know from past games that robik is stubborn and I feel like scum!robik would have been way more stubborn about the obiwan vote... like he would have tried anything to make it work. His posts were never that focused on obiwan though. The fact that he is more interested in playing the game than satisfying some weird personal issue is townie.
Obiwan doesn't look scummy to me either. There's much less in his filter to comment on.
|
|
|
|
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 09:50 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ugh, this is boring.
Thinking the same thing. When do the high-volume posters usually post?
|
At like 4 am because they all live in Europe.
|
Koshi is probably town. The ratio of scum to town in this game is .24. The absolute value of koshi's scum points awarded/town points awarded it is .62. So even though he has issued more town points than scum points, compared to the actual scum/town ratio the number of scum points he is issuing is high.
However, marv is over 50% of koshi's total awarded town points. If you remove marv from the equation koshi has issued 1.75 times as many scum points as town points.
And my conclusion is that he is townie.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 16 2014 09:52 Chairman Ray wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Lord Tolkein
On September 16 2014 09:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: batsnacks
two votes in the last 30 mins but no posts
|
On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though.
On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb.
I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two:
On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously.
On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia.
Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row.
|
On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row.
What do you mean by this?
|
On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here.
Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts.
Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then?
|
Right now the four highest volume posters have a combined 26 pages of filter, which is more than everyone else in the game combined. We should leave them alone today. I think I'm going to start doing that more often. Whichever players have posted more than the entire thread combined d1 get a free town read regardless of what they post.
That's in order, robik, VE, marv, jat.
I'm going to vote Palmar because he claimed mafia twice. Then I'm going to go get beer and start looking at what GlowingBear has been up to. ##vote: Palmar
|
On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this?
Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo.
|
On September 16 2014 09:22 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea...I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I also don't like how you called me out for defending poofter when you're trying to pressure, but then you defend Lord Tolkien when I'm trying to pressure
i gave reason and response to your pressure. You did not give reason for Lord Tolkien, you simply stated he was vastly more scummy. From my point of view, his call out to me was hardly scummy, i thought it was more townie because it drives some conversation between us. I can agree that his second post could be deemed scummy from that opinion you gave. I'm just not sure why you didn't want to state that earlier.
|
On September 16 2014 09:25 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Someone say something interesting to me.
how do you feel about mr Chairman Ray?
|
Canada11355 Posts
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though?
|
Canada11355 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
