|
On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo.
On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then?
I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
|
On September 16 2014 10:42 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:On September 16 2014 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:
I've been re-reading the thread in my state of crippling boredom and palamar does seem like the best bet until people who are being questioned start posting.
Why did batsnacks and Lord Tolkien get voted just recently though? are you asking the thread in general or asking VE and CR respectively? That would have been helpful, I am asking them respectively.
I mentioned It earlier, but I'm voting him because half the players aren't active at all, and out of those players, he seems the most scummy to me.
|
On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Why is everyone ignoring this guy? The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia."
So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him?
|
On September 16 2014 11:16 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:
[quote]
The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master. I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious. i am always serious. Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me. We must make your post retroactively true. I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3. His reasoning not bother you at all? You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter. Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well. Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia." So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him? You mean like, if he said "Mafia, I am" instead of "I am mafia"? No I'd feel exactly the same even if he changed the words.
I think you know what I mean.
|
On September 16 2014 11:27 Hopeless1der wrote:
CR what do you expect to happen with your vote on tolkein? Seems pretty futile to me.
Maybe he'll see that there's pressure on him and he'll start contributing. Who do you think I should vote instead?
|
On September 16 2014 11:20 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:18 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:16 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though. On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb. I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two: On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:
[quote]
i am always serious.
Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously. On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:
[quote]
We must make your post retroactively true.
I am mafia. Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row. What do you mean by this? Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo. On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason. On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:
[quote]
His reasoning not bother you at all?
You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning? On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:
[quote]
Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well.
Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's. Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea... I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy" he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy. regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response) I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways. I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here. Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts. Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then? I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way. He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia." So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him? You mean like, if he said "Mafia, I am" instead of "I am mafia"? No I'd feel exactly the same even if he changed the words. I think you know what I mean. That might be a little too optimistic of you. Are you trying to ask me if Palmer had said something completely different from what I voted him for, would I still be voting him? How am I supposed to answer that?
I take my question back. I think I understand why you're voting him now.
|
On September 16 2014 11:56 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 11:48 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:27 Hopeless1der wrote:
CR what do you expect to happen with your vote on tolkein? Seems pretty futile to me. Maybe he'll see that there's pressure on him and he'll start contributing. Who do you think I should vote instead? I dont care who you vote for, I just want to feel like theres some value added instead of the "oh i has a vote" *plop* feeling I have right now.
I gave a case on Lord Tolkien and I voted him. What more do you want? Why do you care so much about my vote and nobody else's?
|
On September 16 2014 12:03 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 12:00 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:56 Hopeless1der wrote:On September 16 2014 11:48 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 16 2014 11:27 Hopeless1der wrote:
CR what do you expect to happen with your vote on tolkein? Seems pretty futile to me. Maybe he'll see that there's pressure on him and he'll start contributing. Who do you think I should vote instead? I dont care who you vote for, I just want to feel like theres some value added instead of the "oh i has a vote" *plop* feeling I have right now. I gave a case on Lord Tolkien and I voted him. What more do you want? Why do you care so much about my vote and nobody else's? Your vote sticks out as strange because of the timing and lack of discussion besides 1 post with storr. Your case is also based on one post and has as much depth to it as tolkein's filter.
The lack of discussion and lack of depth of my case can be explained by lack of substance in Lord Tolkein's filter. The lack of substance in Lord Tolkein's filter can be explained by how nobody is voting or pressuring him.
I think the solution might be to start voting and pressuring him.
|
kush much better lynch than palmer.
What else is up?
|
On September 17 2014 04:52 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2014 04:52 Chairman Ray wrote:
kush much better lynch than palmer.
What else is up? You are now scumread by Koshi for not giving enough fucks.
What do you mean by not giving enough fucks?
|
On September 17 2014 04:55 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2014 04:54 Chairman Ray wrote:On September 17 2014 04:52 Koshi wrote:On September 17 2014 04:52 Chairman Ray wrote:
kush much better lynch than palmer.
What else is up? You are now scumread by Koshi for not giving enough fucks. What do you mean by not giving enough fucks? You are smart enough to figure it out.
I know exactly what you mean, and dw, there's a legitimate reason for it.
|
I'm here if we need enough votes to consider a swap
|
I'm up for switching to Palmer
|
I actually want to switch to Palmer if more people are willing to consider it. But I also want to lynch kush too.
|
This post screams scum to me:
On September 17 2014 05:36 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2014 05:34 Koshi wrote:On September 17 2014 05:34 Palmar wrote:On September 17 2014 05:34 Koshi wrote:
##unvote
##vote Palmar.
I am ready to change back but Palmar gave a hard townread to Kush. My personal rule forces me to vote Palmar. Did I? Yes you did. 5% succes thingie. I specifically explained I had no good reason for that other than thinking that the one wagon that takes of in Majority Lynch when we don't have a solid case is unlikely to hit mafia. I haven't even read kush.
When there are only two plausible wagons, defending the other wagon using a textbook reason and not reading them is attributed to someone trying to look town/merciful.
|
Back now, sorry I had a meeting.
Are we going to reconsider the lynch, or am I just wasting my time?
|
Ugh nvm, not gonna get anything done in 3 minutes -_-
|
|
|
Palmer's mafia, rayn's town. Day 2 easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
