EPTSeason of the Witch Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Does Soup only reveal playername given a successful initial Soup and a failed followup Soup? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Obviously we should be very wary of claiming. Besides that if someone could tell me how to fix the font on my screen that would be great as it's really annoying to read in a different type than what you've been used to. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On September 04 2014 08:20 geript wrote: I like this point. HarURH is my second lynch of choice currently. Please explain in your words why HaruRH is likely to be scum. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On September 04 2014 08:26 geript wrote: Look at how he's approaching the grail. It's a very odd series of thoughts; more importantly, it's far less likely to come from town that "X and Y are super important for town to win, let's give X and Y the grail" without any questions as to whether or not they're actually town. Plus the "grail bearer is going to die automatically, so lets give it to X and Y important people" isn't exactly a logical thought process. Ehh I don't think HaruRH is mafia for that given how his next post talks about the martyr saving that person. I disagree with your interpretation. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On September 04 2014 08:35 geript wrote: Why do you think his talk about martyr saving the bearer makes his town? I think that your second claim of "grail bearer is going to die so let's give it to important people" is a caricature of what HaruRH said, and I think his followup post of having the martyr save the grail holder such that we don't lose both grail and strong player in one go is a reasonable one to hold. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
gobbledydook, who should we give the grail to and why? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On September 04 2014 08:47 gobbledydook wrote: geript is a very reasonable man. I also think we should give it to him. geript doesn't seem like someone who would go full retard like robik. I trust he will use his powers wisely. ##HolyGrail: geript Even though you disagree with his first read? Please explain. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On September 04 2014 08:54 gobbledydook wrote: geript ninja'ed me. I was talking about how ridiculous robiks 'verbose' scumread of me was. I'm confused so I'll ask again. You voted geript to hold the grail. You also disagreed with his read on HaruRH. I'm curious why you would want to give the grail to someone whose reads differ from you. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Guys, please try to condense your posts / refrain from posting side comments to reduce spam. It affects how well we can re-read thread in the future. Also if possible please cut down on the cussing. It seems unnecessary. As for claiming roles before death, I'm not too sure how that benefits us to do so. I feel like the difference it would make is near endgame but I think it would assist in Witch Soup combos more than benefiting town somehow. Additionally, not too sure what we are trying to do with the Oracle night alignments. For us to use the information the Oracle receives, he essentially has to out himself and will promptly get Witch Souped next round. I feel like the best play may be just to let people do what they think is best, and then organize things as the game progresses. If you are talking about claiming roles after death in Angel QT, that seems poor too. It's still valuable information so I'm not sure what claiming achieves. On September 04 2014 13:38 Oatsmaster wrote: Why are you asking ritoky. And why are you asking such a useless question Because its a potential source of information, and even if you think it is useless the fact that other people don't means that it isn't. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Oats is posturing into a position where he is blaming people and saying that they aren't scumhunting. Realize that this itself isn't scumhunting. You tell me what Oats has done to scum hunt. Nothing. That question at this point is total bogus. Not only that his actions are shutting down potentially good town discussion of setup. While in normal games setup talk is something scum favor because it is safe to do, this is a unique theme game, and setup talk can be very pro town. The discussion of actions, even if we don't arrive at a consensus, is a great means of developing information and reads. Oats, now to you specifically, this game is unique theme. Don't just port over heuristics lazily and pretend you are all that. If you have specific things you want to grill me on, then go ahead, but I'm asking you to change your current approach of pointing fingers at everyone. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
I'm actually inclined to think gobbleygook and sylencia more townish for their setup discussions. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Cool. Could you elaborate on the difference you perceive? Because I'm of the opinion their approaches to it are similar. | ||
| ||
