EPTOn August 05 2014 20:52 Eden1892 wrote:
why don't i read lorem ipsum
it's about as pertinent to the game and marginally more interesting
why don't i read lorem ipsum
it's about as pertinent to the game and marginally more interesting
how so?
World Heavyweight Championship mafia III - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
how so? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I'm having trouble understanding this: On August 05 2014 19:41 Holyflare wrote: This part where he lies that me/gk excessively rode the post when i never even mentioned it as scummy once and only spent half a post talking about it | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 04 2014 10:14 Vivax wrote: Meeeeeh he might just be really suspicious about what haru wrote idk but the gut doesn't like it. The loaded style: "Why are you not scumreading WoS" kinda gave me the feel of a scummy accusation, and that he entered the thread with a very dry "agree about WoS" too. Then brushing off that he might have found Haru suspicious for that when I asked him. He just wanted to understand his point of view? HF on the other hand found it outright mafiaish, and I actually thought GK found Haru scummy too from the style of the questions but apparently he didn't really see something alignment indicative like HF did. hf you are talking about this? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 05 2014 00:20 Vivax wrote: @ JAT: I would say that you should have by now realized that me "defending" Haru wasn't intended as defending Haru but simply saying that I didn't agree with the arguments HF was using, which was that huge focus on the -1 +1 part. I preferred to focus on Haru saying he was null on WoS, so maybe he didn't really think that math through properly but just wanted to express in a weird way he was null on WoS. So far three interpretations of that post of mine have been posted: I shut down discussion, I defend, and I simply express my point of view. What it ultimately means is up to the intention of the observer in my regards, does he only try to find a bad interpretation, or does he consider the post from both perspective? Nope, you meant this. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Try to understand this post if you dare (I don't suggest it). I spent about 5 minutes on it reading it again and again. So far I think it has something to do with goodkarma being scummy because he didn't read the scumminess of his two scum reads equally, and that is scummy because of some other reason I can't understand. But the fact that he thought through all this shit makes him town. + Show Spoiler + On August 05 2014 00:44 Vivax wrote: It seems there is a strong difference in Goodkarma's play regarding his two scumreads. I feel he ended up focusing much more on Haru than on WoS, and that after criticizing Haru for nullreading WoS for that. Like, the one thing GoodKarma had to expect in his opinion was that Haru would scumread WoS with a -1. I think that if they wanted to nullread somebody as opposed to scumreading him, then scum would prefer ścumreading the townie and null reading the other scum. If that's what GK might think, too, then he must just feel as strongly scummy about Wave than he does for Haru, cause just then nullreading WoS might show a scum motive. However all we are left with Goodkarma vs Wave is: WoS wrote this before GK posted that: So they both scumread the same guy, Wave says what he found scummy about Haru, but GoodKarma still asks him that. Besides, I don't really like the reason WoS is using there for scumreading Haru, so I'm surprised Goodkarma wouldn't also try to get more interactions with WoS aside from that sort of loaded post. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
That is metaevidence that he gives up as scum. So why are you townreading him for it? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
YOu can't townread someone for this stupid shit. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 05 2014 21:55 Eden1892 wrote: his reaction to getting "caught" (if that's how we're going to define this) is about as prideless as can be he got caught by marv so he gave up. You cant lose a game you don't play mentality | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 05 2014 21:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'd like to think I'm just honest about how I play. This game I've played like shit. That doesn't mean I'm shit, that just means I'm having a terrible game. Well you are being honest here regardless of your alignment. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 04 2014 16:09 kushm4sta wrote: ##vote gg On August 05 2014 17:16 Tehpoofter wrote: ##Vote Gooblyzilla wtf are you supposed to call this guy? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On August 05 2014 22:35 justanothertownie wrote: You remember Vivax doing shit but not me? Like what? vivax was much more active early d1, as was haru | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||
