EPT
World Cup Mini Mafia - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 15:14 Vivax wrote: If you're town now is your chance to muse with me about possible scum, all you have to do is give me an imaginary townread. If you're town then that is the correct play, and not constantly try to get people to vote for me with motivational posts with no arguments behind them whatsoever. You are the possible scum. I can't imagine it being anybody else. I've presented my arguments several times, which part didn't click that I need to repeat? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 15:21 Vivax wrote: The part where I answered to and picked apart your case. This did not occur lol. I'll start on the point that I think is the most obvious, if you are a townie then you would've realized mderg was innocent. Especially since you were so highly suspicious of Cav. At most only 1 of them could've been mafia, and I think the case was horrible for both. But you turned a blind eye to everything that was presented and pushed hard for his townie lynch. If you can defend this adequately, I'll re-exam you. Until then I'm not going to be swayed by a panicking mafia | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 15:31 Vivax wrote: By that logic everyone on mderg must have been mafia. Really you're so bad. Everyone else wasn't actively debating with me about it. You were arguing with me specifically, about mderg's vote not making sense. It made perfect sense. I can't guarantee anybody else read our exchange, but I know you did, and I know your reasons for voting mderg were horrible, scum reasons. I await your flip, scum | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 15:38 Vivax wrote: Again, for the whole thread to see and compare with your current reads: My current 3 scum reads are Vivax, HaruRH, Rainbows, doesn't this support what I've been saying more than it detracts? lol | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
mderg (6): Tehpoofter, HaruRH, kushm4sta, IAmRobik, Vivax, IAmRobik, Rainbows or do you seriously think I'm going to believe that 2 or less scum are in this list | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 15:50 Vivax wrote: This is bullshit cause you expected me to accept your arguments for him being town or else I'm scum, and if your arguments should be able to convince me, then they should also be able to convince anyone else. You're trying to put it as if your arguments for him being town were tailored just to be used against my push. It doesn't work that way. If your arguments aren't convincing for all guys on the mderg wagon, it doesn't mean that I'm scum for being one of them just cause you were talking to me and not to the others. If you have good arguments for a guy being town, and let's say 3 guys don't believe into them, why do you only pick one of them to be scummy for it? After all, they should be good arguments for everyone reading them without an agenda, but they evidently weren't. You're dodging my question. I'd like you to explain to me what happened from your end of things. If you disagree with any of the statements, tell me which one 1. My arguments was that mderg and cav couldn't both be scum, because of what happened at the end of day 1, with mderg nearly switching his vote to get cav killed. 2. You pushed cav on day 2, heavily implying he's mafia. (not everybody else did this to the degree you did in my opinion. 3. You then pushed mderg. 4. I explained that both mderg and cav couldn't be mafia. We then had an exchange pointing out the explanation for mdergs last second vote switch. So from my point of view, you pushed votes on 2 people, 1 of which you knew had to be confirmed town. How do you explain that? At what point did you stop thinking cav was mafia, and mderg was instead the mafia? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 16:03 Vivax wrote: I already linked you to my response to your case, that's where I have shown why I disagreed with your argument for mderg and Cav both being town. no no no, not them both being town, but at least one was town. Do you disagree that it was clearly presented that at least one was town | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 16:13 ExO_ wrote: no no no, not them both being town, but at least one was town. Do you disagree that it was clearly presented that at least one was town On July 03 2014 16:20 ExO_ wrote: If you don't disagree that at least one had to be town (indicated by the day 1 antics) then at what point did you decide cav was innocent and mderg scum? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 03 2014 18:16 HaruRH wrote: ??? I don't understand your questions at all. ONLY at your point of view is there is at least 1 town in between mderg and cav. So who is confirmed town? Nobody is confirmed town here. Cav's claim reeks of 'you still cant kill me dumb town'. I don't think town, or even cop in this case, would think this way? How can that bolded an honest opinion? On day 1, mderg switched his vote to cav, just barely after time was called. mderg nearly killed cav on day 1 with his lynch vote, it he had posted seconds earlier it would have killed cav. Both cannot be mafia together, because then a mafia would've passed on the final vote to kill a mafia on day 1. How else can you interpret that? I'm at a complete loss as to how you would not understand this. Since both cannot be mafia, at most one can be mafia. So how can you possibly accuse cav of being mafia, and then vote mderg accusing him of being mafia? this is exactly what vivax did on day 2. Accused cav of mafia, and then voted and accused mderg of mafia, ignore the evidence I presented that proved it was impossible to think both. What about that do you not understand? Please explain to me how you thought both could be mafia, because on day 2 it was obvious that at most only 1 out of those 2 was mafia, if any at all. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
*Both cannot be mafia together, because then a mafia would've submitted the final vote to kill a mafia on day 1 | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
##Vote: HaruRH Switching this now, so the 3 mafia can't be the first to 3 to create a tie. Town should switch to Harurh, since we can't see to get the votes out for vivax. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On July 04 2014 07:43 Rainbows wrote: Confidence and conviction isn't always town. It's hard to say, its a gut read. Think about it. Im town, if exo is town he possesses the same info as me. He draws completrly different conclusions. Something is wrong, because occams razor suggests that either he has different info orbdifferent goals. This is why its hard to play town. because you cant always tell ifbsomeone genuinely thought of somethijg differently or they are scum. I 100% agree that we are separate teams. I am town you are mafia Are poofter and OO both claiming medic? | ||
| ||
