Detention Mafia - Page 3

On June 02 2014 04:59 Amiko wrote:
@Slam:

Haru wants to lynch
"everyone on sloosh's 'death list'"

If you look at slOosh's death list, would you list each player Haru wants to lynch?

On June 02 2014 06:35 sqrtofneg1 wrote:

It was funny that sloosh wanted gobbles pressured, even though gobbles was his teammate. I think that an M_Z lynch is justifiable.

As for Haru's post, I'm in agreement with it. I think we should lynch MZ.

On June 02 2014 09:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
if alakaslam doesn't die he's scum.

On June 02 2014 16:15 Amiko wrote:
Bedtime for me pretty soon.



+ Show Spoiler +

It's not a terrible point, but I don't think it is compelling.

There's a couple reasons, but to me the easiest to explain is that something which "confirms him as town unless he's lying" really isn't any confirmation at all.
I mean, by this standard, if you tell me that you are town, that confirms you as town (unless you are lying).

Anyway, Slam isn't my top town but I feel like you could do better if you tried.

I feel the best defense for M_Z (which he didn't offer) is this:
If M_Z and slOosh are both scum, it means that M_Z is roleblocker. When M_Z and slOosh were the lynch candidates, you would think scum would prefer to lynch slOosh (goon) over M_Z (roleblocker). Instead, slOosh made a post which was (apparently) compelling and started to move people toward M_Z over slOosh.

I don't find that to be sufficient.

##Vote: Meapak_Ziphh

We still have a day I think, so for the living please don't be lazy and talk about each other.
Sheeping me isn't particularly helpful since M_Z is the major wagon anyway; if you think M_Z isn't the lynch or someone else is better, we should talk about it sooner rather than later.

On June 03 2014 09:17 Palmar wrote:
Do I have to care?